| Literature DB >> 28324533 |
S Gopalakrishnan1, V Srinivas2, G Alekhya2, B Prakash2.
Abstract
The physiological and molecular responses of six strains of Streptomyces sp. (CAI-13, CAI-85, CAI-93, CAI-140, CAI-155 and KAI-180), with their proven potential for plant growth-promotion (PGP) in rice were studied to understand the mechanisms causing the beneficial effects. In this investigation, those six strains were evaluated for their PGP capabilities in chickpea in the 2012-13 and 2013-14 post-rainy seasons. All of the Streptomyces sp. strains exhibited enhanced nodule number, nodule weight, root weight and shoot weight at 30 days after sowing (DAS) and pod number, pod weight, leaf area, leaf weight and stem weight at 60 DAS in both seasons over the un-inoculated control. At chickpea crop maturity, the Streptomyces strains had enhanced stover yield, grain yield, total dry matter, pod weight, seed number and seed weight in both seasons over the un-inoculated control. In the rhizosphere, at crop maturity, the Streptomyces strains also significantly enhanced soil biological and mineral nutrient traits including microbial biomass carbon, dehydrogenase activity, total nitrogen, available phosphorous and organic carbon in both seasons over the un-inoculated control. Of the six strains of Streptomyces sp., CAI-85, CAI-93 and KAI-180 were found superior to CAI-155, CAI-140 and CAI-13, in terms of their effects on root and shoot development, nodule formation and crop productivity. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs had revealed the success in colonization of the chickpea roots by all six strains. This investigation further confirms the broad-spectrum of PGP activities by the selected Streptomyces sp.Entities:
Keywords: Field demonstration; Plant growth promotion; Scanning electron microscopy; Streptomyces sp.
Year: 2015 PMID: 28324533 PMCID: PMC4569639 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-015-0283-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Effect of the six Streptomyces sp. on agronomic performance of chickpea under field conditions––at 30 and 60 days after sowing
| Isolate | 30 Days after sowing | 60 Days after sowing | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nodule number (plant−1) | Nodule weight (mg plant−1) | Root weight (mg plant−1) | Shoot weight (g plant−1) | Plant height (cm) | Stem weight (g plant−1) | Leaf area (cm−2 plant−1) | Leaf weight (g plant−1) | Pod number (plant−1) | ||||||||||
| Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | |
| CAI-85 | 14 | 62 | 42 | 280 | 187 | 191 | 2.02 | 2.27 | 52 | 50 | 5.24 | 4.78 | 714 | 836 | 4.52 | 4.64 | 71 | 76 |
| CAI-93 | 16 | 65 | 34 | 266 | 181 | 175 | 1.84 | 1.98 | 53 | 49 | 4.85 | 3.96 | 896 | 672 | 5.71 | 3.95 | 84 | 64 |
| CAI-13 | 22 | 50 | 55 | 223 | 180 | 171 | 1.61 | 1.76 | 50 | 48 | 4.59 | 3.98 | 705 | 720 | 5.28 | 3.78 | 63 | 59 |
| CAI-140 | 20 | 60 | 81 | 228 | 183 | 181 | 1.49 | 1.93 | 51 | 48 | 3.90 | 4.22 | 709 | 743 | 4.82 | 3.94 | 71 | 73 |
| CAI-155 | 22 | 52 | 63 | 229 | 173 | 169 | 1.56 | 1.94 | 51 | 48 | 3.40 | 3.96 | 690 | 712 | 4.43 | 4.15 | 54 | 69 |
| KAI-180 | 22 | 50 | 33 | 247 | 179 | 190 | 1.51 | 1.87 | 55 | 50 | 5.63 | 4.05 | 851 | 717 | 6.99 | 4.05 | 84 | 59 |
| Control | 12 | 49 | 29 | 221 | 171 | 168 | 1.35 | 1.72 | 50 | 47 | 3.36 | 3.88 | 670 | 632 | 4.29 | 3.71 | 43 | 59 |
| Mean | 18 | 56 | 48 | 242 | 179 | 178 | 1.63 | 1.92 | 52 | 49 | 4.43 | 4.12 | 748 | 719 | 5.15 | 4.03 | 67 | 66 |
| SE± | 1.5** | 0.9*** | 3.1*** | 9.4** | 2.8* | 4.6** | 0.070*** | 0.066** | 0.3*** | 0.5** | 0.021*** | 0.178* | 11.1*** | 16.2*** | 0.108*** | 0.157* | 2.8*** | 2.5*** |
| LSD (5 %) | 4.7 | 2.8 | 9.4 | 28.9 | 8.5 | 14.1 | 0.217 | 0.204 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 0.065 | 0.549 | 34.1 | 49.9 | 0.333 | 0.484 | 8.5 | 7.8 |
| CV % | 14 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
Y1 year 1 (2012–13), Y2 year 2 (2013–14), SE standard error, LSD least significant differences, CV coefficients of variation
* Statistically significant at 0.05; ** Statistically significant at 0.05; *** Statistically significant at 0.001
Effect of the six Streptomyces sp. on agronomic performance and yield potential of chickpea under field conditions—at harvest
| Isolates | Stover yield (t ha−1) | Grain yield (t ha−1) | Total dry matter (t ha−1) | 1000 seed (weight g) | Pod weight (g plant−1) | Seed number (plant−1) | Seed weight (g plant−1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | |
| CAI-85 | 1.64 | 1.81 | 1.86 | 2.10 | 3.50 | 3.91 | 222 | 196 | 18.3 | 22.7 | 56 | 84 | 15.3 | 16.4 |
| CAI-93 | 1.30 | 1.76 | 1.76 | 1.81 | 3.06 | 3.57 | 221 | 198 | 18.1 | 19.5 | 58 | 73 | 15.3 | 15.7 |
| CAI-13 | 1.94 | 1.80 | 1.76 | 1.79 | 3.69 | 3.58 | 222 | 198 | 18.4 | 21.3 | 65 | 80 | 15.3 | 16.3 |
| CAI-140 | 1.48 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 2.06 | 3.24 | 3.86 | 223 | 205 | 17.7 | 21.3 | 57 | 76 | 15.5 | 15.6 |
| CAI-155 | 1.58 | 1.74 | 1.75 | 1.81 | 3.33 | 3.55 | 223 | 197 | 17.9 | 22.2 | 58 | 87 | 15.5 | 17.1 |
| KAI-180 | 1.40 | 2.10 | 1.76 | 1.87 | 3.16 | 3.97 | 223 | 196 | 17.6 | 25.7 | 61 | 100 | 15.5 | 19.6 |
| Control | 1.11 | 1.68 | 1.68 | 1.67 | 2.79 | 3.34 | 220 | 195 | 17.4 | 17.0 | 54 | 66 | 15.0 | 13.3 |
| Mean | 1.49 | 1.81 | 1.77 | 1.87 | 3.26 | 3.68 | 222 | 198 | 17.9 | 21.4 | 58 | 81 | 15.4 | 16.3 |
| SE± | 0.049*** | 0.068* | 0.011*** | 0.068** | 0.047*** | 0.092** | 0.4*** | 1.2*** | 0.18** | 1.18** | 1.2** | 3.2*** | 0.08** | 0.68** |
| LSD (5 %) | 0.200 | 0.206 | 0.033 | 0.210 | 0.146 | 0.284 | 1.2 | 3.6 | 0.57 | 3.66 | 3.7 | 9.9 | 0.25 | 2.10 |
| CV % | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
Y1 year 1 (2012–13), Y2 year 2 (2013–14), SE standard error, LSD least significant differences, CV coefficients of variation
* Statistically significant at 0.05; ** Statistically significant at 0.05; *** Statistically significant at 0.001
Effect of the six Streptomyces sp. on rhizosphere soil microbial biomass carbon, dehydrogenase, total N, available P and organic carbon activities of chickpea under field conditions—at harvest
| Isolates | Microbial biomass carbon (µg g−1 soil) | Dehydrogenase activity (µg TPF g−1 soil 24 h−1) | Total N (ppm) | Available P (ppm) | Organic carbon (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | |
| CAI-85 | 1,042 | 576 | 58.0 | 58.7 | 701 | 738 | 11.0 | 7.5 | 0.51 | 0.56 |
| CAI-93 | 1,183 | 856 | 59.9 | 62.2 | 643 | 751 | 10.6 | 7.6 | 0.49 | 0.56 |
| CAI-13 | 1,128 | 774 | 60.4 | 63.0 | 683 | 739 | 11.3 | 9.5 | 0.50 | 0.56 |
| CAI-140 | 958 | 630 | 61.6 | 76.0 | 683 | 746 | 12.2 | 10.4 | 0.49 | 0.56 |
| CAI-155 | 987 | 574 | 70.3 | 60.0 | 704 | 762 | 20.8 | 7.8 | 0.48 | 0.64 |
| KAI-180 | 1097 | 822 | 63.1 | 86.7 | 637 | 755 | 19.3 | 8.8 | 0.49 | 0.60 |
| Control | 877 | 551 | 55.4 | 55.7 | 632 | 735 | 10.1 | 6.9 | 0.47 | 0.55 |
| Mean | 1039 | 683 | 61.2 | 66.1 | 669 | 746 | 13.6 | 8.3 | 0.49 | 0.57 |
| SE± | 20.7*** | 24.8*** | 2.13* | 3.19** | 11.8* | 4.8* | 0.18*** | 0.53* | 0.004** | 0.008** |
| LSD (5 %) | 71.7 | 84.8 | 7.38 | 11.04 | 41.0 | 16.5 | 0.62 | 1.83 | 0.013 | 0.026 |
| CV % | 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 2 |
Y1 year 1 (2012–13), Y2 year 2 (2013–14), SE standard error, LSD least significant differences, CV coefficients of variation
* Statistically significant at 0.05; ** Statistically significant at 0.05; *** Statistically significant at 0.001
Fig. 1Scanning electron microscopy photographs of the six Streptomyces sp. showing colonization on the roots of chickpea. Representative SEM images of control and treated chickpea roots. a Normal surface of chickpea roots without any microbial treatment, b–g chickpea roots colonized by PGP Streptomyces strains CAI-13, CAI-85, CAI-93, CAI-140, CAI-155 and KAI-180 respectively