| Literature DB >> 28324455 |
M L Racchi1, A Bove2, A Turchi2, G Bashir3, M Battaglia4, A Camussi2.
Abstract
Molecular typing of 377 female date palm trees belonging to 18 Libyan cultivars and representing common genotypes in the central Libyan oasis of Al Jufrah was performed using 16 highly polymorphic microsatellite or SSR loci. A total of 110 alleles with an average of 6.88 alleles per locus were scored indicating the high level of polymorphism existing among the cultivars thus allowing their genetic fingerprinting. Moreover 28 alleles out of 110 were fixed. All the cultivars were characterized by negative values of the Fixation Index (F) due to an excess of heterozygotes with respect to HW equilibrium. The pattern of genetic diversity among cultivars was estimated by codominant genetic distances and presented by principal coordinates analysis (PCoA). The observed pattern evidences the genetic diversity existing among cultivars that allow distinguishing them easily. The average dissimilarity internal to each cultivar ranged from 0 to 21. Seven cultivars showed value zero indicating no genetic difference within cultivar in agreement with their Fixation Index (F = 1). A varietal identification key was also built using multiloci genotyping with only three microsatellite loci that identified 23 alleles in total. The possibility to attribute the unknown male plant to a cultivar was also considered and male parentage analysis was performed. Fifty-five male plants out of 63 were assigned to a definite cultivar with high confidence level. The positive result obtained in identifying males confirmed the suitability of SSR for clone fingerprinting and cultivar identification, thus opening new prospects for date palm breeding.Entities:
Keywords: Cultivars; Date palm; Genetic diversity; Identification; SSR
Year: 2013 PMID: 28324455 PMCID: PMC3909576 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-013-0116-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Fig. 1Al Jufrah area in Libya
Fig. 2Distribution of cultivar samples among the localities of Al Jufrah oasis
Primer sequences of microsatellite loci used for genotyping of Libyan date palm cultivars
| Source | Locus code | Primer sequences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Billotte et al. ( | mPdCIR10 | F:ACCCCGGACGTGAGGTG | R:CGTCGATCTCCTCCTTTGTCTC |
| mPdCIR15 | F:AGCTGGCTCCTCCCTTCTTA | R:GCTCGGTTGGACTTGTTCT | |
| mPdCIR25 | F:CAAATCTTTGCCGTGAG | R:GGTGTGGAGTAATCATGTAGTAG | |
| mPdCIR32 | F:CAAGACCCAAGGCTAAC | R:GGAGGTGGCTTTGTAGTAT | |
| mPdCIR70 | F:CCATTTATCATTCCCTCTCTTG | R:CTTGGTAGCTGCGTTTCTTG | |
| mPdCIR78 | F:CCCCTCATTAGGATTCTAC | R:GCACGAGAAGGCTTATAGT | |
| mPdCIR85 | F:TGGATTTCCATTGTGAG | R:CCCGAAGAGACGCTATT | |
| mPdCIR93 | F:GAGAGAGGGTGGTGTTATT | R:TTCATCCAGAACCACAGTA | |
| Akkak et al. ( | PDCAT1 | F:CTGAAATCTCTGTTCAAATCC | R:AGTTTGGATCTATTTGTGAGTTATTTTCTTT |
| PDCAT2 | F:GGCCTTCTCTTCCCTAATGGG | R:AGTTTCTTGCCCCTGTTCTTTC | |
| PDCAT6 | F:AATCAGGGAAACCACAGCCA | R:GTTTAAAGCCTTCTCAAGATAGCCTCAG | |
| PDCAT8 | F:GCTTAAGTGGTTAGTTGCCAA | R:GTTTGGCAGAAGTATTGAAAAGTTGA | |
| PDCAT11 | F:TTAGTAGACTCCCCACCGTCC | R:TGTTTCATGGTGCTGGAGAATGAA | |
| PDCAT14 | F:TGTTGCCATTCACATGCTGCG | R:TTTGGACTAGTCCCTCCCTCCC | |
| PDCAT17 | F:TGCTGCAAATCTAGGTCACGAG | R:TTTACCCCTCGGCCAAATGTAA | |
| PDCAT18 | F:CAGCGGAGGGTGGGCCTCGTT | R:TCTCCATCTCCCTTTTTCTTCTGCTACTC | |
Summary of microsatellite allele data revealed by 16 microsatellites loci in 377 female trees belonging to 18 Libyan date palm cultivars
| SSR locus | Allelic range (bp) | Total alleles | Number of genotypes |
|
| Number of fixed alleles | Fixed alleles | Cultivarsa with the fixed allele |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mPdCIR 10 | 138–176 | 6 | 13 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 1 | 154 | A, Be, D, Hal, O, S, Tag, Tam |
| mPdCIR 15 | 142–157 | 5 | 15 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 2 | 142 | Tag |
| 157 | Z | |||||||
| mPdCIR 25 | 219–257 | 6 | 17 | 0.90 | 0.76 | 1 | 249 | Be |
| mPdCIR 32 | 306–321 | 5 | 13 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 2 | 316 | S, Z |
| 309 | Tal | |||||||
| mPdCIR 70 | 205–227 | 9 | 32 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 1 | 213 | D |
| mPdCIR 78 | 126–173 | 11 | 36 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 2 | 136 | Tag |
| 153 | S | |||||||
| mPdCIR 85 | 175–199 | 8 | 39 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 2 | 175 | O |
| 181 | Hal | |||||||
| mPdCIR 93 | 181–197 | 7 | 17 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 1 | 197 | O |
| PDCAT 1 | 103–123 | 4 | 10 | 0.23 | 0.63 | 4 | 103 | Tam, Z |
| 105 | Bes, S | |||||||
| 119 | A, D, Hal, S | |||||||
| 123 | Tal | |||||||
| PDCAT 2 | 186–209 | 7 | 20 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 2 | 186 206 | Z |
| Bes | ||||||||
| PDCAT 6 | 142–172 | 7 | 17 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 2 | 150 | Z |
| 158 | O | |||||||
| PDCAT 8 | 222–258 | 6 | 14 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 2 | 246 | S |
| 252 | Tal | |||||||
| PDCAT 11 | 154–177 | 6 | 20 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 2 | 154 | Z |
| 159 | S | |||||||
| PDCAT 14 | 141–163 | 9 | 20 | 0.42 | 0.63 | 1 | 155 | D, Hal, O, Tag, Tal, Tam |
| PDCAT 17 | 131–157 | 6 | 14 | 0.45 | 0.63 | 3 | 141 | S |
| 147 | A, D, K, N, O | |||||||
| 157 | Tal | |||||||
| PDCAT 18 | 123–149 | 8 | 29 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 110 | 28 | ||||||
Hobs observed heterozygosity by locus, Hexp expected heterozygosity at the HW equilibrium
aA Abel, Ba Bamour, Ber Berni, Bes Bestian, D Deglet, Hal Halima, Ham Hamria, K Kathari, N Noyat Meka, O Omglaib, S Saiedi, Sa Saila, So Sokeri, Tag Tagiat, Tal Talis, Tam Tameg, Tas Tasferit, Z Zebur
Fig. 3Microsatellite allele frequency distribution revealed by 16 microsatellites loci in the five localities of Al Jufrah oasis
Genetic diversity indices for the 18 Libyan date palm cultivars
| Cultivar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abel | 23 | 1.938 | 1.767 | 0.747 | 0.379 | 0.387 | −0.973 | 75.00 |
| Bamour | 7 | 2.813 | 2.121 | 0.653 | 0.491 | 0.530 | −0.329 | 100.00 |
| Berni | 21 | 2.625 | 1.733 | 0.622 | 0.348 | 0.356 | −0.790 | 87.50 |
| Bestian | 33 | 2.750 | 1.684 | 0.629 | 0.339 | 0.344 | −0.855 | 93.75 |
| Deglet | 25 | 1.688 | 1.630 | 0.625 | 0.314 | 0.320 | −0.992 | 62.50 |
| Halima | 15 | 1.750 | 1.750 | 0.750 | 0.375 | 0.388 | −1.000 | 75.00 |
| Hamria | 34 | 3.313 | 2.049 | 0.915 | 0.497 | 0.504 | −0.842 | 100.00 |
| Kathari | 34 | 2.500 | 1.861 | 0.807 | 0.425 | 0.432 | −0.897 | 93.75 |
| Noyat Meka | 9 | 2.563 | 1.755 | 0.576 | 0.365 | 0.387 | −0.578 | 93.75 |
| Omglaib | 12 | 1.563 | 1.563 | 0.563 | 0.281 | 0.293 | −1.000 | 56.25 |
| Saiedi | 21 | 1.813 | 1.813 | 0.813 | 0.406 | 0.416 | −1.000 | 81.25 |
| Saila | 11 | 1.625 | 1.625 | 0.625 | 0.313 | 0.327 | −1.000 | 62.50 |
| Sokeri | 19 | 5.125 | 3.630 | 0.708 | 0.656 | 0.674 | −0.079 | 100.00 |
| Tagiat | 39 | 1.813 | 1.813 | 0.813 | 0.406 | 0.412 | −1.000 | 81.25 |
| Talis | 25 | 1.625 | 1.625 | 0.625 | 0.313 | 0.319 | −1.000 | 62.50 |
| Tameg | 22 | 2.750 | 1.833 | 0.685 | 0.380 | 0.389 | −0.802 | 81.25 |
| Tasferit | 13 | 3.938 | 2.124 | 0.630 | 0.478 | 0.497 | −0.319 | 100.00 |
| Zebur | 14 | 1.625 | 1.625 | 0.625 | 0.313 | 0.324 | −1.000 | 62.50 |
| Mean | 20.9 | 2.434 | 1.889 | 0.689 | 0.393 | 0.406 | −0.803 | 81.60 |
| SE | 0.5 | 0.071 | 0.043 | 0.025 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.028 | 3.63 |
N sample size, Na number of alleles, Ne number of effective alleles, Hobs observed heterozygosity, Hexp expected heterozygosity at the HW equilibrium, UHe unbiased expected heterozygosity, F Fixation Index, P % percentage of polymorphic loci
Fig. 4Score plot of Libyan date palm cultivars on the first two principal coordinates from codominant genotypic distances (Smouse and Peakall 1999) of 16 microsatellite loci. The average dissimilarity for all pair-wise comparison internal to each variety is reported in bracket
Fig. 5Identification key of 18 Libyan palm date cultivars based on three microsatellites locus fingerprints
Assignments with positive scores of pair LOD value of parentage analysis performed on male plants sampled in Al Jufrah farms
| Collection site | Male code | Candidate cultivar | Pair LOD score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sokna | SMM-Q-04 | Kathari | 9.47 |
| SME-Q-03 | Tasferit | 0.13 | |
| SMT-Q-01 | Tasferit | 6.60 | |
| SMT-Q-02 | Sokeri | 1.26 | |
| SSA-Q-01 | Deglet | 9.87 | |
| SSA-Q-02 | Deglet | 1.77 | |
| SAK-Q-02 | Bestian | 6.97 | |
| SAK-Q-03 | Sokeri | 2.20 | |
| Hun | HSM-Q-02 | Bestian | 1.26 |
| HRG-Q-01 | Tagiat | 3.08 | |
| H6I-Q-02 | Deglet | 1.05 | |
| H6I-Q-03 | Tagiat | 5.73 | |
| H6E-Q-03 | Bamour | 1.33 | |
| H3F-Q-03 | Tameg | 1.26 | |
| H5H-Q-02 | Abel | 3.45 | |
| H5H-Q-03 | Hamria | 2.16 | |
| H3H-Q-02 | Bestian | 1.12 | |
| Waddan | WOE-Q-02 | Abel | 9.15 |
| WBH-Q-01 | Abel | 3.33 | |
| WBH-Q-02 | Sokeri | 1.75 | |
| WFZ-Q-03 | Tagiat | 9.90 | |
| WHS-Q-01 | Tagiat | 3.80 | |
| W4B-Q-03 | Hamria | 1.82 | |
| WBB-B | Tasferit | 1.60 |