| Literature DB >> 28324429 |
Abstract
The explosive global spreading of multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) has provoked an urgent need to discover novel anti-TB agents. Enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase from Mtb is a well-known and thoroughly studied target for anti-tuberculosis therapy. In the present analysis, virtual screening techniques performed from Drug bank database by utilizing INH-NAD adduct as query for the discovery of potent anti-TB agents. About 100 molecules sharing similar scaffold with INH-NAD adduct were analyzed for their binding effectiveness. The initial screening based on number of rotatable bonds gave 42 hit molecules. Subsequently, physiochemical properties such as toxicity, solubility, drug-likeness and drug score were analyzed for the filtered set of compounds. Final data reduction was performed by means of molecular docking and normal mode docking analysis. The result indicates that DB04362, adenosine diphosphate 5-(beta-ethyl)-4-methyl-thiazole-2-carboxylic acid could be a promising lead compound and be effective in treating sensitive as well as drug-resistant strains of Mtb. We believe that this novel scaffolds might be the good starting point for lead compounds and certainly aid the experimental designing of anti-tuberculosis drug in a short time.Entities:
Keywords: Bioavailability; INH-NAD adduct; Molecular docking; Normal mode analysis; Virtual screening
Year: 2013 PMID: 28324429 PMCID: PMC4026456 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-013-0146-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Number of rotatable bonds obtained from the Molinspiration program
| S. no. | Compound ID | Number of rotatable bonds | S. no. | Compound ID | Number of rotatable bonds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DB00157 | 11 | 22 | DB01860 | 8 |
| 2 | DB01907 | 11 | 23 | DB03909 | 8 |
| 3 | DB03797 | 11 | 24 | DB02661 | 6 |
| 4 | DB02498 | 11 | 25 | DB04366 | 6 |
| 5 | DB01893 | 9 | 26 | DB04362 | 10 |
| 6 | DB04497 | 11 | 27 | DB02930 | 8 |
| 7 | DB02059 | 9 | 28 | DB03070 | 11 |
| 8 | DB01842 | 8 | 29 | DB01812 | 6 |
| 9 | DB04099 | 11 | 30 | DB03230 | 7 |
| 10 | DB03431 | 6 | 31 | DB02902 | 8 |
| 11 | DB02363 | 8 | 32 | DB02527 | 1 |
| 12 | DB03363 | 11 | 33 | DB03732 | 11 |
| 13 | DB03969 | 11 | 34 | DB00131 | 4 |
| 14 | DB03478 | 11 | 35 | DB04395 | 8 |
| 15 | DB03020 | 11 | 36 | DB02098 | 6 |
| 16 | DB00171 | 8 | 37 | DB02483 | 9 |
| 17 | DB03893 | 11 | 38 | DB03708 | 6 |
| 18 | DB01660 | 8 | 39 | DB04418 | 9 |
| 19 | DB04554 | 6 | 40 | DB03222 | 8 |
| 20 | DB01774 | 9 | 41 | DB02694 | 9 |
| 21 | DB04071 | 11 | 42 | DB07205 | 8 |
Fig. 1INH-NAD adduct bound with enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase. The figure was rendered using the program LIGPLOT
Binding free energy analysis of lead compounds
| S. no. | Compound | Binding free energy with native | Binding free energy with mutant |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INH-NAD | −43.70 | −48.27 |
| 2 | DB04362 | −55.61 | −57.27 |
| 3 | DB02483 | −38.69 | −56.31 |
| 4 | DB03893 | −45.89 | −54.34 |
| 5 | DB04497 | −24.28 | −54.03 |
| 6 | DB03732 | −43.04 | −53.45 |
| 7 | DB03478 | −38.92 | −53.43 |
| 8 | DB00157 | −56.11 | −53.35 |
| 9 | DB02498 | −46.73 | −51.31 |
| 10 | DB04418 | −54.80 | −50.58 |
Fig. 2Docked complex of INH-NAD adduct with native (a) and mutant (b) type enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase
Fig. 3Docked complex of DB04362 with native (a) and mutant (b) type enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase
Physicochemical Properties of lead compounds
| S. no. | Compound | Toxicity risks | Osiris calculations | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mutagenic | Tumorigenic | Irritant | Reproductive effective | Log S | DL | DS | ||
| 1 | INH-NAD | – | – | – | – | −5.75 | −16.27 | 0.17 |
| 2 | DB04362 | – | – | – | – | −2.11 | −12.8 | 0.3 |
| 3 | DB02483 | – | – | – | – | −3.1 | −13.3 | 0.3 |
| 4 | DB04497 | – | – | – | – | −2.43 | −15.54 | 0.28 |
| 5 | DB03732 | – | – | – | – | −2.44 | −13.48 | 0.27 |
| 6 | DB03478 | – | – | – | – | −3.32 | −15.52 | 0.29 |
| 7 | DB00157 | – | – | – | – | −4 | −15.43 | 0.25 |
| 8 | DB02498 | – | – | – | – | −3.67 | −13.78 | 0.25 |
Fig. 4Comparison of free energies of binding for the INH-NAD adduct with native (black) and mutant (red) structures using normal mode analysis