| Literature DB >> 28324419 |
M Dilipkumar1, M Rajasimman2, N Rajamohan3.
Abstract
In this work, inulinase was produced by solid state fermentation by Streptomyces sp. using copra waste as carbon source. The nutrients were screened by Plackett-Burman design. From the pareto chart it was found that the nutrients, namely, soya bean cake, MgSO4·7H2O and (NH4)2SO4 were found to be most significant nutrient components. Hence, these three components were selected for further optimization using central composite design (CCD) in response surface methodology (RSM). The optimum conditions were soya bean cake: 0.05711 g/gds, MgSO4·7H2O: 0.00063 g/gds and (NH4)2SO4: 0.00772 g/gds. Under these optimized conditions, the production of inulinase was found to be 131 U/gds. The constants in the Michaelis-Menten equation were evaluated and high R2 value implies the fitness of the model.Entities:
Keywords: Copra waste; Inulinase; Optimization; RSM; Streptomyces sp.
Year: 2013 PMID: 28324419 PMCID: PMC3824788 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-012-0112-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Nutrient screening using a Plackett–Burman design
| Nutrient code | Nutrient | Levels (g/10 gds) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low (−1) | High (+1) | ||
| A | Yeast extract | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| B | Beef extract | 0.05 | 0.15 |
| C | MnSO4·7H2O | 0.10 | 0.50 |
| D | K2HPO4 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| E | Soya bean cake | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| F | MgSO4·7H2O | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| G | NH4Cl | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| H | KCl | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| J | (NH4)2HPO4 | 0.05 | 0.30 |
| K | NH4NO3 | 0.05 | 0.10 |
| L | ZnSO4·7H2O | 0.10 | 0.50 |
| M | (NH4)2SO4 | 0.06 | 0.10 |
| N | Corn steep liquor | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| O | Peptone | 0.05 | 0.15 |
| P | Dextrose | 0.10 | 0.30 |
| Q | FeSO4·7H2O | 0.0005 | 0.002 |
| R | KH2PO4 | 0.10 | 0.60 |
| S | Urea | 0.10 | 0.30 |
Plackett–Burman experimental design matrix for screening of important variables for inulinase production using Streptomyces sp.
| Run no. | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | Inulinase (U/gds) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 35.32 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 38.43 |
| 3 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 21.32 |
| 4 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 53.00 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 61.45 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 45.30 |
| 7 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 28.45 |
| 8 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 40.65 |
| 9 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 31.62 |
| 10 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 32.64 |
| 11 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 81.72 |
| 12 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 42.33 |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 52.31 |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 33.49 |
| 15 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 62.51 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 74.84 |
| 17 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 33.43 |
| 18 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 47.23 |
| 19 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 82.54 |
| 20 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 45.89 |
Ranges of the independent variables used in RSM
| Variables | Levels (g/gds) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code | −1.68 | −1 | 0 | +1 | +1.68 | |
| Soya bean cake | X1 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
| MgSO4·7H2O | X2 | 0.0002 | 0.0004 | 0.0007 | 0.00095 | 0.0012 |
| (NH4)2SO4 | X3 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.01 |
Central composite design (CCD) of factors in coded levels with enzyme activity as response
| Run no. |
|
|
| Inulinase activity (U/gds) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Predicted | ||||
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 41.65 | 41.82 |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 50.66 | 48.51 |
| 3 | 1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 42.63 | 50.14 |
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 120.76 | 120.91 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −1.68 | 102.35 | 90.18 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 124.65 | 120.91 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 123.34 | 120.91 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 121.66 | 120.91 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 126.34 | 120.91 |
| 10 | −1.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 102.64 | 98.25 |
| 11 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 59.74 | 41.99 |
| 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 122.34 | 120.91 |
| 13 | 0.00 | −1.68 | 0.00 | 59.76 | 67.01 |
| 14 | 1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 69.23 | 68.66 |
| 15 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 48.75 | 33.62 |
| 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.68 | 39.78 | 59.65 |
| 17 | −1.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 51.34 | 61.77 |
| 18 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 45.74 | 48.95 |
| 19 | −1.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 72.86 | 76.87 |
| 20 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 88.34 | 82.10 |
Fig. 1Pareto chart showing the effect of media components on inulinase activity using Streptomyces sp. (A yeast extract; B beef extract; C MnSO4·7H2O; D K2HPO4; E-soya bean cake; F MgSO4·7H2O; G NH4Cl; H KCl; I (NH4)2HPO4; J NH4NO3; K ZnSO4·7H2O; L (NH4)2SO4; M corn steep liquor; N peptone; O dextrose; P FeSO4·7H2O; Q KH2PO4; R urea)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for response surface quadratic model for the production of inulinase
| Source | Coefficient factor | Sum of squares | DF |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 120.914 | 19,438.58 | 9 | 14.29 | 0.0001 |
|
| −8.30414 | 941.76 | 1 | 6.23 | 0.0316 |
|
| −7.48871 | 765.89 | 1 | 5.07 | 0.0481 |
|
| −9.07624 | 1,125.03 | 1 | 7.44 | 0.0212 |
| 13.7500 | 1,512.50 | 1 | 10.01 | 0.0101 | |
| 2.00000 | 32.00 | 1 | 0.21 | 0.6552 | |
| −3.00000 | 72.00 | 1 | 0.48 | 0.5057 | |
| −20.5071 | 6,060.51 | 1 | 40.10 | <0.0001 | |
| −23.5123 | 7,966.94 | 1 | 52.72 | <0.0001 | |
| −16.2644 | 3,812.23 | 1 | 25.23 | 0.0005 | |
| Residual | 1,511.17 | 10 | |||
| Lack of fit | 1,404.34 | 5 | 13.15 | 0.0067 | |
| Pure error | 106.83 | 5 | |||
| Cor total | 20,949.75 | 19 |
SD: 12.29; R2: 92.79 %; Mean: 79.75; Adj R2: 83.29 %; CV %: 15.41; Pred R2: 76.40 %; Adeq precision: 10.043
Fig. 23D plot showing the effect of soya bean cake and MgSO4·7H2O on inulinase activity
Fig. 33D plot showing the effect of soya bean cake and (NH4)2SO4 on inulinase activity
Fig. 43D plot showing the effect of MgSO4·7H2O and (NH4)2SO4 on inulinase activity
Comparison of inulinase production
| Substrate | Microorganisms | Inulinase activity (U/gds) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat bran | 107.64 | Selvakumar and Pandey | |
|
| 122.88 | ||
| Dry sugarcane bagasse |
| 391.9 | Mazutti et al. |
| Sugarcane bagasse |
| 250 | Mazutti et al. |
| Wheat bran and rice husk |
| 436.2 | Sheng et al. |
| Sugar cane bagasse |
| 396.6 | Bender et al. |
| Wheat bran and rise bran |
| 291.0 | Guo et al. |
| Pressmud | 89 | Dilipkumar et al. | |
| Copra waste | 131 | This work |