Literature DB >> 22986837

Prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiao-Peng Xia1, Hong-Lin Chen, Hong-Bin Cheng.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Systematic review of published prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after spine surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of ASD in patients after cervical and lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD is a common complication after spine surgery in long-term follow-up. A large body of literature has been reported on the topic, but no meta-analysis of the epidemiological data on ASD has been published
METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE until March 2012 published in English language that reported the prevalence of ASD after spine surgery. We determined the ASD rates by calculating proportions and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study and then pooled the data to derive a pooled proportion and 95% CI.
RESULTS: A total of 94 studies with 34,716 patients from 19 countries were included. The occurrence of radiograph ASD ranged from 4.8% to 92.2%, and the pooled prevalence was 29.3% (95% CI, 22.7%-35.8%) by the random-effects model. The occurrence of symptoms ASD ranged from 0.0% to 30.3%, and the pooled prevalence was 7.4% (95% CI, 6.4%-8.5%). In cervical position, the occurrence of radiograph ASD and symptoms ASD was 32.8% (95% CI, 17.8%-47.9%) and 6.3% (95% CI, 4.8%-7.8%); in lumbar position, the occurrence of radiograph ASD and symptoms ASD was 26.6% (95% CI, 21.3%-31.9%) and 8.5% (95% CI, 6.4%-10.7%). In the 0.5- to 2- or less, more than 2- to 5- or less, and more than 5- to 20- or less year diagnosis time, the radiograph ASD prevalence was 21.8% (16.0%-27.6%), 33.6% (21.8%-45.4%), and 37.4% (10.7%-64.1%), respectively; and the symptoms ASD prevalence was 6.5% (4.8%-8.1%), 12.1% (8.2%-16.0%), and 3.2% (2.5%-4.0%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Spine surgery is associated with significant risk of ASD. These figures may be useful in the estimation of the burden of the ASD after spine surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22986837     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318273a2ea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  59 in total

Review 1.  Stem cell therapy for intervertebral disc regeneration: obstacles and solutions.

Authors:  Daisuke Sakai; Gunnar B J Andersson
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Clinical and radiological evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up: a prospective study of 384 patients.

Authors:  T Dufour; J Beaurain; J Huppert; P Dam-Hieu; P Bernard; J P Steib
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Lumbar disc replacement surgery-successes and obstacles to widespread adoption.

Authors:  Stephan N Salzmann; Nicolas Plais; Jennifer Shue; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

4.  [Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion of vertebral fractures in paraplegic patients].

Authors:  L Homagk; J Henneberger; G O Hofmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Complications and Rates of Subsequent Lumbar Surgery Following Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty and Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Claire D Eliasberg; Michael P Kelly; Remi M Ajiboye; Nelson F SooHoo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Yantao Zhao; Jiaguang Tang; Dongfeng Ren; Jidong Guo; Huadong Wang; Li Li; Shuxun Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  The role of stem cell therapies in degenerative lumbar spine disease: a review.

Authors:  David Oehme; Tony Goldschlager; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Peter Ghosh; Graham Jenkin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Aberrant intervertebral motion in patients with treatment-resistant nonspecific low back pain: a retrospective cohort study and control comparison.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Fiona Mellor; Alan Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Extracellular matrix production by nucleus pulposus and bone marrow stem cells in response to altered oxygen and glucose microenvironments.

Authors:  Syeda M Naqvi; Conor T Buckley
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Prevalence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical decompressive surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fenyong Shou; Zhe Li; Huan Wang; Chongnan Yan; Qi Liu; Chi Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.