Literature DB >> 28324164

Novel intraoperative use of the "Tensipresser" to assess factors predictive of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Manabu Mikamori1,2, Kunihito Gotoh3,4, Hidenori Takahashi1, Hirofumi Akita1, Akira Tomokuni1, Shogo Kobayashi1, Masayuki Ohue1, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara1, Masahiko Yano1, Osamu Ishikawa1, Masato Sakon1.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a challenging complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). 'Soft pancreas' is reported as a risk factor for PF; however, palpation by the surgeon is not an objective method of evaluating pancreatic texture. We conducted this study to investigate whether a texture analyzer called a "Tensipresser" can be used to quantify pancreatic tissue hardness and predict the development of postoperative PF.
METHODS: We assessed pancreatic texture in 85 patients who underwent PD. After surgeons assessed the texture of the pancreas subjectively, the physical properties were measured on the pancreatic margin intraoperatively, by the two-bite method using the "Tensipresser". The incidence and severity of PF were based on the definitions of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula.
RESULTS: Symptomatic PF (grade B and C) developed in 16% of the patients. Patients were divided into two groups based on the Tensipresser measurement: those with a soft and fragile pancreas with hardness < 2070 gw/cm2 and cohesiveness < 0.65 (SF group); and all other patients (non-SF group). In the univariate and multivariate analysis, a small pancreatic duct diameter (<4 mm), no conduction of preoperative chemoradiation therapy, and inclusion in the SF group were significant predictors of PF.
CONCLUSION: The Tensipresser can evaluate pancreatic texture objectively, helping to define intraoperatively, those at risk of the development of PF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Soft pancreas

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28324164     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-017-1509-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  32 in total

1.  Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; David C Chang; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; JoAnn Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Christopher J Sonnenday; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael R Marohn; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Objective and subjective hardness of a test item used for evaluating food mixing ability.

Authors:  N M Salleh; K Fueki; N R Garrett; T Ohyama
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Risk factors, predictors and prevention of pancreatic fistula formation after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Takehiro Okabayashi; Michiya Kobayashi; Isao Nishimori; Takeki Sugimoto; Saburo Onishi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2007-11-30

5.  Pancreaticodigestive anastomosis and the postoperative management strategies to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Masaki Ohmuraya; Masahiko Hirota; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Are there preoperative factors related to a "soft pancreas" and are they predictive of pancreatic fistulas after pancreatic resection?

Authors:  Riccardo Casadei; Claudio Ricci; Giovanni Taffurelli; Marielda D'Ambra; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Carlo Ingaldi; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Quality evaluation of rice crackers based on physicochemical measurements.

Authors:  Sumiko Nakamura; Dai Suzuki; Ryota Kitadume; Ken'ichi Ohtsubo
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 2.043

9.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection.

Authors:  N Sato; K Yamaguchi; K Chijiiwa; M Tanaka
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Self-assembling peptide hydrogel SPG-178 as a pancreatic fistula-preventing agent.

Authors:  Manabu Mikamori; Kunihito Gotoh; Shogo Kobayashi; Koji Uesugi; Yoshifumi Iwagami; Daisaku Yamada; Yoshito Tomimaru; Hirofumi Akita; Takehiro Noda; Yuichiro Doki; Hidetoshi Eguchi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.