Literature DB >> 28323911

Monogenic Diabetes Accounts for 6.3% of Cases Referred to 15 Italian Pediatric Diabetes Centers During 2007 to 2012.

Maurizio Delvecchio1, Enza Mozzillo2, Giuseppina Salzano3, Dario Iafusco4, Giulio Frontino5, Patrizia I Patera6, Ivana Rabbone7, Valentino Cherubini8, Valeria Grasso9, Nadia Tinto10, Sabrina Giglio11, Giovanna Contreas12, Rosa Di Paola13, Alessandro Salina14, Vittoria Cauvin15, Stefano Tumini16, Giuseppe d'Annunzio14, Lorenzo Iughetti17, Vilma Mantovani18, Giulio Maltoni19, Sonia Toni20, Marco Marigliano12, Fabrizio Barbetti9,21.   

Abstract

Context: An etiologic diagnosis of diabetes can affect the therapeutic strategy and prognosis of chronic complications. Objective: The aim of the present study was to establish the relative percentage of different diabetes subtypes in patients attending Italian pediatric diabetes centers and the influence of an etiologic diagnosis on therapy. Design, Setting, and Patients: This was a retrospective study. The clinical records of 3781 consecutive patients (age, 0 to 18 years) referred to 15 pediatric diabetes clinics with a diagnosis of diabetes or impaired fasting glucose from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2012 were examined. The clinical characteristics of the patients at their first referral to the centers, type 1 diabetes-related autoantibodies, molecular genetics records, and C-peptide measurements, if requested for the etiologic diagnosis, were acquired. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was to assess the percentage of each diabetes subtype in our sample.
Results: Type 1 diabetes represented the main cause (92.4%) of diabetes in this group of patients, followed by monogenic diabetes, which accounted for 6.3% of cases [maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY), 5.5%; neonatal diabetes mellitus, 0.6%, genetic syndromes, 0.2%]. A genetic diagnosis prompted the transfer from insulin to sulphonylureas in 12 patients bearing mutations in the HNF1A or KCNJ11 genes. Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed in 1% of the patients. Conclusions: Monogenic diabetes is highly prevalent in patients referred to Italian pediatric diabetes centers. A genetic diagnosis guided the therapeutic decisions, allowed the formulation of a prognosis regarding chronic diabetic complications for a relevant number of patients (i.e.,GCK/MODY), and helped to provide genetic counseling.
Copyright © 2017 Endocrine Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28323911     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2016-2490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  28 in total

1.  Insulin: still a miracle after all these years.

Authors:  Fabrizio Barbetti; Simeon I Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Genetics of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Maria J Redondo; Andrea K Steck; Alberto Pugliese
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.866

3.  Copy Number Variation in GCK in Patients With Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young.

Authors:  Amanda J Berberich; Céline Huot; Henian Cao; Adam D McIntyre; John F Robinson; Jian Wang; Robert A Hegele
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Beta cell function and insulin sensitivity in obese youth with maturity onset diabetes of youth mutations vs type 2 diabetes in TODAY: Longitudinal observations and glycemic failure.

Authors:  Silva Arslanian; Laure El Ghormli; Morey H Haymond; Christine L Chan; Steven D Chernausek; Rachelle G Gandica; Rose Gubitosi-Klug; Lynne L Levitsky; Maggie Siska; Steven M Willi
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.866

Review 5.  Not quite type 1 or type 2, what now? Review of monogenic, mitochondrial, and syndromic diabetes.

Authors:  Roseanne O Yeung; Fady Hannah-Shmouni; Karen Niederhoffer; Mark A Walker
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 6.  How Recent Advances in Genomics Improve Precision Diagnosis and Personalized Care of Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young.

Authors:  Martine Vaxillaire; Philippe Froguel; Amélie Bonnefond
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 7.  Clinical Spectrum Associated with Wolfram Syndrome Type 1 and Type 2: A Review on Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.

Authors:  Maurizio Delvecchio; Matteo Iacoviello; Antonino Pantaleo; Nicoletta Resta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Etiologic distribution and clinical characteristics of pediatric diabetes in 276 children and adolescents with diabetes at a single academic center.

Authors:  Ja Hye Kim; Yena Lee; Yunha Choi; Gu-Hwan Kim; Han-Wook Yoo; Jin-Ho Choi
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 9.  Monogenic Diabetes: From Genetic Insights to Population-Based Precision in Care. Reflections From a Diabetes Care Editors' Expert Forum.

Authors:  Matthew C Riddle; Louis H Philipson; Stephen S Rich; Annelie Carlsson; Paul W Franks; Siri Atma W Greeley; John J Nolan; Ewan R Pearson; Philip S Zeitler; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Detection of Diabetes Status and Type in Youth Using Electronic Health Records: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.

Authors:  Brian J Wells; Kristin M Lenoir; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Jean M Lawrence; Dana Dabelea; Catherine Pihoker; Sharon Saydah; Ramon Casanova; Christine Turley; Angela D Liese; Debra Standiford; Michael G Kahn; Richard Hamman; Jasmin Divers
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.