Since loss of function mutations of PINK1 lead to early onset Parkinson's disease, there has been growing interest in the discovery of small molecules that amplify the kinase activity of PINK1. We herein report the design, synthesis, serum stability, and hydrolysis of four kinetin riboside ProTides. These ProTides, along with kinetin riboside, activated PINK1 in cells independent of mitochondrial depolarization. This highlights the potential of modified nucleosides and their phosphate prodrugs as treatments for neurodegenerative diseases.
Since loss of function mutations of PINK1 lead to early onset Parkinson's disease, there has been growing interest in the discovery of small molecules that amplify the kinase activity of PINK1. We herein report the design, synthesis, serum stability, and hydrolysis of four kinetin riboside ProTides. These ProTides, along with kinetin riboside, activated PINK1 in cells independent of mitochondrial depolarization. This highlights the potential of modified nucleosides and their phosphate prodrugs as treatments for neurodegenerative diseases.
Parkinson’s
disease (PD)
is the second most common neurodegenerative disease in the world.[1] It affects around 130 000 people in the
U.K. and over 1 million people in the U.S.[1] Considering that current PD therapies and medical interventions
are limited only to addressing the symptoms of this disease[2] coupled with a general rise in lifespan, the
rate of PD incidence in the future is likely to increase significantly.
This highlights the need for new and specific PD treatments. As part
of our efforts into discovering novel PD therapeutics, we focused
on PINK1 (PTEN-induced kinase 1), a protein kinase mutated in somepatients with early onset PD.[3]n class="Gene">PINK1
is a mitochondrial n class="Chemical">serine/threonine protein kinase that possesses
a unique N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence, a transmembrane
domain, and three insertional loops within its catalytic kinase domain.[4] Following inner mitochondrial membrane depolarization,
it becomes stabilized on the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) where
it phosphorylates the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin at serine 65 (Ser65)
on its N-terminal ubiquitin-like domain. Such phosphorylation activates
Parkin, which is also mutated in early onset PD,[5] leading to the ubiquitylation of a series of its substrates
on the OMM that act as a signal for the degradation of mitochondria
by autophagy (mitophagy).[6]
Inn class="Disease">PD,
the majority of PINK1 mutations are located within its kinase
domain and consequently affect its catalytic activity.[7,8] This confirms that the kinase activity of PINK1 is critical to the
prevention of neurodegeneration. This notion has been verified in
Drosophila models of PINK1 in which kinase-inactive versions of PINK1
failed to rescue neurodegeneration compared to the wild-type gene.[9] Hence, the activation of PINK1 emerged as a useful
strategy to induce and maintain neuroprotective effects, an approach
that would be useful in treating PD.
To date, reported efforts
into the discovery of small molecules
that activate n class="Gene">PINK1 led to the identification of n class="Chemical">N6-furfuryladenine, tern class="Chemical">med kinetin (1, Figure ),[10] which is undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of
familial dysautonomia and the prevention from skin photodamage.[11] In cells, pronounced activation of PINK1 by
kinetin was only observed following co-incubation with the mitochondria-depolarizing
agent CCCP (carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazine),[5] which in itself activates PINK1 in cells.[12] Studies into the mechanism by which PINK1 is
activated by kinetin revealed that kinetin was converted intracellularly
in four consecutive metabolic steps to the active metabolite kinetin
riboside (KR) triphosphate 4, which acts as a PINK1ATP-neosubstrate
(Figure ).[10]
Figure 1
Chemical structure of kinetin (1) and its
metabolism
in cells to generate the active substrate kinetin riboside triphosphate
(4).
Chemical structure of n class="Chemical">kinetin (1) and its
metabolism
in cells to generate the active substrate kinetin riboside triphosphate
(4).
Given that the cellular
activation of synthetic nucleobases and
their nucleoside derivatives may be of limited efficiency as compared
to natural nucleobases and nucleosides, we explored the direct use
of the KR monophosphate intermediate (3) as an activator
of PINK1. Using this metabolite, 3, instead of kinetin
to activate PINK1 in cells would bypass two important activation steps,
glycosylation and the first phosphorylation step, that kinetin must
undergo consecutively. This suggests that KR monophosphate would be
a more potent activator of PINK1 than kinetin. As nucleoside monophosphates
often have poor in vivo stability and inefficient cellular uptake,
we employed the ProTide prodrug technology[13] to deliver KR monophosphate into cells. This prodrug technology
has inspired the discovery of two FDA-approved (antiviral) nucleotide
monophosphate and monophosphonate drugs with many more undergoing
clinical trials.[14]The synthesis
of n class="Chemical">KR ProTides started by making n class="Chemical">kinetin riboside
in a single step from 6-chloropurine riboside (10) as
reported (Figure ).[15] This involved refluxing 6-chloropurine riboside
with furfurylamine in ethanol in the presence of triethylamine. The
pure product was subsequently coupled[16] with the appropriate phosphorochloridate (6–9) in the presence of BuMgCl
or NMI as a base to afford the desired KR ProTides (11–14).
Figure 2
Synthesis of kinetin riboside and its ProTides.
Reagents and conditions:
(i) POCl3, TEA, Et2O, −78 °C; (ii) l-alanine ester hydrochloride, TEA, DCM, −78 °C;
(iii) furfurylamine, TEA, EtOH, N2, 77 °C, (iv) BuMgCl or NMI, DCM, N2, rt.
Synthesis of papan class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">kinetin riboside anpan>d its n class="Chemical">ProTides.
Reagents and conditions:
(i) n class="Chemical">POCl3, TEA, Et2O, −78 °C; (ii) l-alanine ester hydrochloride, TEA, DCM, −78 °C;
(iii) furfurylamine, TEA, EtOH, N2, 77 °C, (iv) BuMgCl or NMI, DCM, N2, rt.
In the design of these ProTides,
the amino acid of the ProTides
was fixed as l-alanine, since this historically[17] has given the optimum biological activity and
is processed well by enzymes during the metabolism of the ProTides
in vivo. A small selection of ester motifs was used in this study
[methyl (Me), isopropyl (Pr), tert-butyl (Bu), and benzyl
(Bn)] to probe the influence of these moieties on the ProTides’
biological activity.Since these n class="Chemical">ProTides are prodrugs aimed
at delivering KR monophosphate,
we initially explored the hydrolysis of the phosphate masking groups
to release the naked KR monophosphate. The intracellular metabolism[18] of ProTides is known to be triggered by esterase
enzymes, such as cathepsin A,[19] which cleave
off the ester motif (Figure ). The generated carboxylate group (15) undergoes
a nucleophilic attack on the phosphate group resulting in the loss
of the phenyl group and the formation of an unstable five-membered
heterocyclic ring (16). A water molecule subsequently
attacks the phosphate group to open this ring and generate metabolite 17. Finally, a phosphoramidase-type enzyme, e.g., Hint-1,[20−22] hydrolyzes the P–N bond of metabolite 17 leading
to the release of the KR monophosphate.
Figure 3
Postulated mechanism
of in vivo metabolism of ProTides to release
nucleoside analogue monophosphates.
Postulated papan class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">mechanpan>ism
of in vivo pan> class="Chemical">metabolism of ProTides to release
n class="Chemical">nucleoside analogue monophosphates.
To probe the hydrolysis of n class="Chemical">KR ProTides to release n class="Chemical">KR monophosphate,
we followed the hydrolysis of the KRProTide 14 by 31P NMR in the presence of recombinant cathepsin A (Figure A).[16] We chose KRProTide 14 as it has an l-alanine isopropyl moiety akin to the two ProTides approved for use
in the clinics, e.g., sofosbuvir and tenofovir alafenamide, which
both bear the samel-alanine isopropyl ester moiety.[17] Before the addition of the enzyme, ProTide 14 (in acetone-d6) showed two
peaks (δP 3.58 and 3.88) corresponding to its two
diastereoisomers. After ∼15 min incubation with cathepsin A
in Trizma buffer, two peaks at δP 3.7 and 4.1 appeared,
which correspond to the parent ProTide diastereoisomers under the
acetone-d6/Trizma buffer. After ∼2
h, a new peak at δP 6.81 started appearing. This
corresponds to metabolite 17 in agreement with previous
reports.[16] Following 12 h, almost all of
ProTide 14 was converted to metabolite 17 and after 48 h incubation a new peak, δP −0.11,
appeared, a typical 31P NMR shift of nucleoside monophosphates.
Indeed, negative ion electrospray ionization mass spec analysis of
the sample showed that this new peak had a mass of 426.1 g/mol, which
matches the mass of KR monophosphate 3 (MW = 427.31 g/mol)
(Supporting Information Figure S1). Although
in this sample, there was no phosphoramidase-type enzyme, e.g., Hint-1,
that cleaves the P–N bond of intermediate 17 to
generate the monophosphate species, it appears that the P–N
bond of metabolite 17 was unstable under the assay condition
after >48 h of incubation. Together, the data indicated that incubation
of a KR ProTide with cathepsin A triggered its hydrolysis to the major
metabolite 17 with a trace of KR monophosphate.
Figure 4
Metabolism
and serum stability of KR ProTides. (A) 31P NMR of cathepsin
A mediated in vitro degradation of KR ProTide 14. (B)
Docking of metabolite 17 into the crystal
structure of Hint-1 to predict the cleavage of the P–N bond.
(C) Stability of KR ProTide 14 in human serum over 12
h as monitored by 31P NMR.
n class="Chemical">Metabolism
and serum stability of KR ProTides. (A) 31P NMR of cathepsin
A n class="Chemical">mediated in vitro degradation of KRProTide 14. (B)
Docking of metabolite 17 into the crystal
structure of Hint-1 to predict the cleavage of the P–N bond.
(C) Stability of KRProTide 14 in human serum over 12
h as monitored by 31P NMR.
To verify whether the n class="Chemical">kinetin riboside amidate 17 would
be a good substrate for the carboxypeptidase n class="Gene">Hint-1, which cleaves
the P–N bonds of n class="Chemical">phosphoramidates,[20−22] we performed
in silico docking of metabolite 17 into the cocrystal
structure of Hint-1 with AMP (Figure B). Analysis of the different predicted poses indicated
that the KR nucleobase was stabilized by hydrophobic interactions
with two phenylalanine residues (F19 and F41) and isoleucine (I44).
Critically, the phosphate moiety was placed where the phosphate group
of AMP was located while the phosphoramidate motif was positioned
in a pocket that included the key amino acid residues required for
the Hint-1 catalytic activity (serine 107, histidines 112 and 114).
Such position suggests that metabolite 17 is likely to
be processed by Hint-1 to release KR monophosphate, in agreement with
previous conclusions.[16]
Subsequently,
we examined the stability of KR ProTides in human
and mouse serum in situ. For this, we incubated KRProTide 14 in human (Figure C) or mouse serum (Supporting Information Figure S2) at 37 °C and followed the sample by 31P
NMR. At t = 0, two close 31P NMR signals
δP 4.0 and 4.5 ppm corresponding to the two diastereoisomers
of KRProTide 14 were present. The time-course 31P NMR revealed that no new peaks appeared that may correspond to
new metabolites. Indeed, following ∼11 h incubation in human
and mouse serum there were no changes in the 31P NMR signals
that correspond to the KR ProTide indicating its stability in these
environments. Additionally, we studied the stability of KR ProTides
in acid environment. For this, we incubated ProTide 14 in acidic buffer, pH 1, and monitored it by 31P NMR over
12 h. The data showed that the ProTide was completely stable in this
acidic environment, pH 1, since the phospho peaks corresponding to
ProTide 14 persisted throughout the 12 h period studied
(Supporting Information Figure S3).Once the hydrolysis and stability of KR ProTides were established,
we then investigated their ability to activate n class="Gene">PINK1 in cells. Briefly,
HEK293 Flp-In TRex HEK293 cells stably expressing wild-type PINK1
were co-transfected with untagged wild type Parkin. Upon activation,
PINK1 directly phosphorylates Parkin at Ser65,[23] and this phosphorylation site was used as a readout for
the activity of PINK1 in cells. Initially, the cells were treated
with 50 μM kinetin, KR, or KR ProTides (11–14) for 24 h (Figure ).
Figure 5
Activation of PINK1 by KR ProTides in cells. Flp-In TRex HEK293
cells stably expressing PINK1 were transfected with wild-type Parkin.
Cells were transfected with 50 μM KR ProTides 11–14, kinetin, or kinetin riboside for 24 h. Cells
were then lysed and probed with anti-phospho Ser65 Parkin (pS65 Parkin),
total parkin, PINK1, and vinculin antibodies. *NS: nonspecific band.
Activation of n class="Gene">PINK1 by KR ProTides in cells. Flp-In TRex HEK293
cells stably expressing PINK1 were transfected with wild-type Parkin.
Cells were transfected with 50 μM KR ProTides 11–14, kinetin, or kinetin riboside for 24 h. Cells
were then lysed and probed with anti-phospho Ser65 Parkin (pS65 Parkin),
total parkin, PINK1, and vinculin antibodies. *NS: nonspecific band.
Interestingly three out of the
four KR ProTides showed activation
of PINK1, as judged by Parkin Ser65 phosphorylation in the absence
of CCCP treatment. KR ProTide 13 exhibited the most significant
activation followed by ProTides 14 and 11. Notably, KR also showed significant activation of PINK1 while treatment
with kinetin did not lead to noticeable PINK1 activation in the absence
of CCCP.The activation of n class="Gene">PINK1 by KR ProTides indicates that
the ProTides
were metabolized to release KR monophosphate, which was then further
phosphorylated to the active triphosphate counterpart to act as a
PINK1ATP-neosubstrate. This possibility is supported by the lack
of PINK1 activation with KR ProTide 12, which has the Bu ester motif that is known to be poorly metabolized
in vivo by esterases as compared to ProTides with Me, Pr, and Bn esters.[13] In
fact, in vitro cathepsin A hydrolysis of KR ProTide 12 was very slow after a 12 h incubation with the esterase enzyme cathepsin
A as ∼50% of the parent ProTide remained intact (Supporting Information Figure S4) in contrast
to ProTide 14, which was rapidly hydrolyzed (Figure ). The fact that
KR showed comparable PINK1 activation to KR ProTides suggests that
the first phosphorylation step by which KR is converted into its monophosphate
species, and which is bypassed by the ProTides, is not the rate limiting
step but is its activation. This is seen with other therapeutic nucleosides
such as lamivudine and zidovudine for which the first phosphorylation
step is not the rate-limiting in their activation but the second or
the third phosphorylation steps.[24]
Since the activation of PINK1 by KR and its ProTides was determined
after a 24 h incubation (Figure ), we next determined the time-dependent activation
of PINK1 in cells by the most potent KR ProTide activator of PINK1, 13. Under similar conditions, we treated cells with ProTide 13 for 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h (Figure ). The data show that KR ProTide 13 activated PINK1 in a time-dependent manner with the most prominent
activation observed after a 24 h treatment. The activation, however,
was not as significant as achieved with CCCP, and no phosphorylation
of Parkin was detected in cells expressing the Parkin S65A mutant
as expected.
Figure 6
Time-dependent activation of PINK1 by KR ProTide 13 in cells. Flp-In TRex HEK293 cells stably expressing PINK1
were
transfected with wild-type or S65A Parkin. Experiment was performed
as in Figure .
Tin class="Chemical">me-dependent activation of PINK1 by KR ProTide 13 in cells. Flp-In TRex HEK293 cells stably expressing PINK1
were
transfected with wild-type or n class="Mutation">S65A Parkin. Experiment was performed
as in Figure .
In conclusion, we herein described
the first application of the
powerful ProTide phosphate prodrug technology to elaborate nucleoside-based
molecules that activate PINK1 in cells. Of the four KR ProTides synthesized
and studied in this work, three KR ProTides showed activation of the
kinase activity of PINK1 with KR ProTide 13 exhibiting
the highest potency. Uniquely, this activation was independent of
CCCP, a mitochondrial depolarizing agent, which has been used previously[10] in identifying kinetin as an activator of PINK1.
In view of the ability of these KR ProTides to activate PINK1, it
may be promising to optimize these further as potential neuroprotective
agents for PD. Such endeavor is supported by the favorable human and
mouse serum stability profiles of these ProTides in addition to their
encouraging stability in acidic environments. Notably, our approach
of using the ProTide technology in developing protein kinase activators
has the potential to be expanded to the discovery of ATP-neosubstrates
for other protein kinases beyond PINK1 and neurodegeneration.
Experimental Section
General Information
n class="Chemical">Dichloromethane, n class="Chemical">diethyl ether,
n class="Chemical">methanol, and toluene were dried in-house using a Pure Solv-MD solvent
purification system. All the other solvents were used as received
from commercial suppliers. All of the other reagents used in the synthesis
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich except l-alanine isopropylester. All reactions were carried out under an argon atmosphere. Reactions
were monitored with analytical TLC on silica gel 60-F254 precoated
aluminum plates and visualized under UV (254 nm) and/or with 31P NMR spectra. Column chromatography was performed on silica
gel (35–70 μM). NMR data were recorded on a Bruker AV300,
AVIII300, AV400, AVIII400, or DRX500 spectrometer in the deuterated
solvents indicated, and the spectra were calibrated on residual solvent
peaks. Chemical shifts (δ) are quoted in ppm, and J values are quoted in Hz. In reporting spectral data, the following
abbreviations were used: s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q
(quartet), dd (doublet of doublets), and m (multiplet). HPLC was carried
out on a DIONEX summit P580 quaternary low pressure gradient pump
with a built-in vacuum degasser using a Summit UVD 170s UV/vis multichannel
detector. Solvents were used as HPLC grade. Chromeleon software was
used to visualize and process the obtained chromatograms. Analytical
separations used a flow rate of 1 mL/min, semipreparative used a flow
rate of 3 mL/min, and preparative used a flow rate of 20 mL/min. All
tested compounds had a purity of ≥95% as shown by HPLC or elemental
analysis (see Supporting Information).
Kinetin Riboside (2)[15]
n class="Chemical">Furfurylamine (0.54 mL, 6.2 mmol) and Et3N were
added dropwise to a suspension of 6-chloropurine riboside 10 (600 mg, 2.1 mmol) in n class="Chemical">EtOH (30 mL). This was refluxed for 18 h at
60 °C. The resulting yellow solution was evaporated under reduced
pressure to yield the crude mixture as a cream paste. This was washed
with Et2O (3 × 25 mL) and filtered to give the product
as a white crystalline solid (679 mg, 93%). 1H NMR (400
MHz, MeOD) δ 8.26 (2H, s, H-2/H-8), 7.43 (1H, dd, J = 1.9, 0.9 Hz, CH2ArO-H), 6.34 (1H,
dd, J = 3.2, 1.8 Hz, CH2ArO-H), 6.31 (1H, dd, J = 3.2, 0.9 Hz, CH2ArO-H), 5.95 (1H, d, J = 6.4 Hz,
1′-H), 4.80 (2H, s, NH2CH2), 4.74 (1H, dd, J = 6.4, 5.1 Hz, 2′-H),
4.31 (1H, dd, J = 5.1, 2.5 Hz, 3′H), 4.16
(1H, q, J = 2.5 Hz, 4′-H), 3.81 (2H, ddd, J = 57.3, 12.6, 2.6 Hz, 5′-H2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) 152.0 (C-8/C-2), 151.6 (CH2ArO-C), 149.6, 147.8 (ArN-C), 142.0 (CH2ArO-CH), 140.3 (C-8/C-2), 119.9 (ArN-C), 110.0 (CH2ArO-CH), 106.9
(CH2ArO-CH), 89.9 (1′-C), 86.8
(4′-C), 74.0 (2′-C), 71.3 (3′-C), 62.1 (5′-C),
36.7 (NHCH2). MS-ESI (m/z): C15H17N5O5 [M + Na]+ 370.1.
n class="Chemical">l-Alanine
n class="Chemical">methyl n class="Chemical">ester hydrochloride (400 mg, 2.9 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous
CH2Cl2 (20 mL) under an inert atmosphere. Following
this, phenyl phosphorodichloridate (0.53 mL, 2.9 mmol) was added
dropwise over 15 min. Et3N (0.77 mL, 5.8 mmol) was then
added at −78 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 30 min.
The solution was then allowed to warm to room temperature over 2 h.
Solvent was then removed under reduced pressure and the remaining
white precipitate suspended in anhydrous Et2O (50 mL).
This was filtered and the filtrate evaporated under reduced pressure,
yielding the crude product as a light brown oil. Purification via
flash column chromatography gave the pure product as a colorless oil
(729 mg, 91%) (eluent 7:3 EtOAC/hexane). 31P NMR (120 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 7.94, 7.62; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 7.45–7.33 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.31–7.21 (3H, m, Ar-H), 4.62–4.52
(1H, m, N-H), 4.26–4.14 (1H, m, CHCH3), 3.79, 3.77 (2H, 2 s, OCH3), 1.51 (3H, dd, J = 7.1, 4.1 Hz, CHCH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ
173.4 (COCH3), 150.1 (Ar-COP), 130.3, 126.4, 121.0 (Ar-CH), 53.3 (OCH3), 51.1 (CHCH3), 20.9 (CHCH3).
n class="Chemical">KR 2 (200 mg, 0.60 mmol) was
suspended in anhydrous THF (15 mL) under an inert atmosphere. To this, BuMgCl (0.09 mL, 0.68 mmol) was then added dropwise
over 15 min. The resulting solution was stirred for 10 min, and following
this, 6 (241 mg, 0.86 mmol) in anhydrous THF (1.5 mL)
was then added dropwise over 10 min. The mixture was left to stir
for 18 h. MeOH (2 mL) was then added to quench the reaction before
solvent was removed under reduced pressure to leave the crude product
as a pale yellow oil. This was purified via flash column chromatography
and then preparative TLC to yield the final product as a wn class="Disease">hite solid
(34 mg, 10%) (eluent 3:97 to 5:95 MeOH/CH2Cl2). 31P NMR (120 MHz, MeOD) δ 3.84, 3.69; 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 8.27 (1H, s, ArN-CH), 8.23, 8.20 (1H, 2 s, ArN-CH), 7.43 (1H, m, CH2ArO-H), 7.30 (2H, t, J =
7.9 Hz, Ph-H), 7.22–7.12 (3H, m, Ph-H), 6.34 (1H, dd, J = 3.4, 1.8 Hz, CH2ArO-H), 6.32 (1H, d, J =
2.8 Hz, CH2ArO-H), 6.04 (1H, t, J = 5.0 Hz, 1′-H), 4.80 (2H, br s, NHCH2), 4.70–4.60 (1H, m, 2′H), 4.46–4.30
(3H, m, 3′H/5′H2), 4.29–4.23 (1H,
m, 4′-H), 3.95–3.77 (2H, 2 m, CHCH3), 3.61 (3H, s, OCH3), 1.30–1.27
(3H, m, CHCH3); 13C NMR (100
MHz, MeOD) δ 175.5 (COOCH3), 154.0
(ArN-CH), 153.4 (ArO-C), 152.1 (Ph-C), 150.3 (ArN-C), 143.4 (ArO-CH), 140.7 (ArN-CH), 130.7, 126.2, 121.9 (Ph-CH), 120.9 (ArN-C), 111.4, 108.2 (ArO-CH), 90.0 (1′-C), 84.4 (4′-C), 75.4 (2′-C),
71.6 (3′-C), 67.3 (5′-C), 52.7 (OCH3), 51.4 (CHCH3), 38.4 (NHCH2), 20.3 (CHCH3). HRMS-ESI (m/z): calcd for C25H29N6O9NaP [M + Na]+ 611.1631, found 611.1633. Found: C 51.2, H 5.3, N 14.2. Calcd
for C25H29N6O9P: C 51.0,
H 4.97, N 14.3%.
Procedure was
adapted from n class="Chemical">Mehellou
et al.[16] n class="Chemical">ProTide 14 (5.0 mg)
was dissolved in acetone-d6 (0.15 mL),
followed by addition of Trizma buffer (0.30 mL, pH 7.4). After recording
a control 31P NMR spectrum containing ProTide in acetone-d6 and buffer, defrosted cathepsin A (0.1 mg
dissolved in 0.15 mL of Trizma buffer) was added to the mixture. A 31P NMR was then run immediately after the addition and then
at even time intervals over 11 h. The sample was then analyzed by 31P NMR after 24 and 48 h. All 31P NMR spectra recorded
at 22 °C (±1).
Serum Stability
Procedure was adapted
from Slusarczyk
et al.[25] n class="Chemical">ProTide 14 (5.0 mg)
was dissolved in n class="Chemical">DMSO-d6 (0.10 mL) and
D2O (0.15 mL). All 31P NMR spectra were recorded
at 37 °C. Two control spectra were recorded, one
containing ProTide 14 (5.0 mg) in DMSO-d6 (0.10 mL) and D2O (0.15 mL) and the other
containing defrosted human serum (0.3 mL), DMSO-d6 (0.10 mL), and D2O (0.15 mL). Following this,
a previously defrosted serum (human or mouse) (0.30 mL) was added
to the NMR tube and a spectrum immediately run. Spectra were recorded
at 30 min after the addition and then at even time intervals over
11 h.
Acid Stability
Procedure was adapted from Slusarczyk
et al.[25] To n class="Chemical">ProTide 12 (5
mg) in n class="Chemical">methanol-d4 (0.25 mL) was added
acidic buffer, pH 1 (prepared from equal parts of 0.2 M HCl and 0.2
M KCl). The sample was then subjected to 31P NMR experiments
at 37 °C, and the spectra were recorded every 20 min over 12
h.
Docking Studies
PC Windows 7 with Intel Core i7-4790/3.6GHz
microprocessor, 16 GB RAM, and 64 bit operating system was used to
execute the computational studies. Docking was performed applying
the molecular modeling modules, namely, Omega2, FRED, and VIDA provided
by OpenEye Scientific Software (http://www.eyesopen.com). The three-dimensional crystal structure
of the cocrystallized AMP with the humanHINT1 was retrieved from
the Protein Data Bank (PDB code 1KPF),[26] and the
active site was subsequently identified on the basis of the bound
ligand. Multiple conformers for metabolite 17 were generated by Omega2
using the default settings.[27] FRED (fast
rigid exhaustive docking) implements a rigid docking approach to fit
these conformers into the predefined binding site and rank the poses
by scoring functions.[28,29] The VIDA module was then used
to visualize and inspect the docked poses within the receptor’s
active site and to identify the main interacting residues.
Cell Studies
Flp-In T-Rex n class="CellLine">HEK293 cells stably expressing
n class="Gene">PINK1-FLAG wild-type were generated previously.[23] Cells were maintained in n class="Chemical">DMEM (Dulbeco’s modified
Eagle medium) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovin serum, 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin,
plus 15 μg/mL blasticidin and 100 μg/mL hygromycin at
37 °C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. On day 0, cells were
seeded in DMEM. One day 1, cells were transiently transfected with
wild type or S65A Parkin using polyethylenimine (Polysciences) according
to the manufacturer’s instruction. One day 2, PINK1-FLAG overexpression
was induced by adding 0.1 μg/mL doxycycline in DMEM for 24 h
before treating cells with compounds or mitochondrial uncoupler, CCCP,
as indicated in the figure legends. All compounds were dissolved in
DMSO.
Sample Preparation and Immunoblotting
This was carried
out as we reported previously.[23]Lysis Buffer Used: 50 mM n class="Chemical">Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM n class="Chemical">EDTA, 1
mM n class="Chemical">EGTA, 1% (w/v) Triton, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM sodium
glycerophosphate, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate,
0.25 M sucrose, 0.1% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM benzamidine, 0.1
mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Antibodies
Used: Mouse monoclonal anti-PINK1 antibody (humanPINK1 residues
125–539) was raised by Dundee Cell Products, anti-vinculin
and anti-GAPDH antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology,
anti-Parkin phospho-serine 65 rabbit monoclonal antibody was raised
by Epitomics in collaboration with the Michael J. Fox Foundation for
Research, and anti-Parkin mouse monoclonal antibody was obtained from
Santa Cruz.
Authors: E R Dorsey; R Constantinescu; J P Thompson; K M Biglan; R G Holloway; K Kieburtz; F J Marshall; B M Ravina; G Schifitto; A Siderowf; C M Tanner Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-11-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Helen I Woodroof; Joe H Pogson; Mike Begley; Lewis C Cantley; Maria Deak; David G Campbell; Daan M F van Aalten; Alexander J Whitworth; Dario R Alessi; Miratul M K Muqit Journal: Open Biol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 6.411
Authors: Youcef Mehellou; Rocco Valente; Huw Mottram; Elisabeth Walsby; Kenneth I Mills; Jan Balzarini; Christopher McGuigan Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Martin S Davey; Roshni Malde; Rory C Mykura; Alfie T Baker; Taher E Taher; Cécile S Le Duff; Benjamin E Willcox; Youcef Mehellou Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 7.446