Literature DB >> 283231

Elastomeric impression materials: effect of bulk on accuracy.

W B Eames, J C Sieweke, S W Wallace, L B Rogers.   

Abstract

Impression trays were fabricated providing 2, 4, and 6 mm spaces to determine the stability and accuracy of nine elastomeric impression materials on a simulated full crown preparation steel die. The interface space of 2 mm produced the most accurate impressions for all of the materials tested. All impression materials except one fell within the revised American Dental Association Specifications. The clinical-type tests, using castings on dies poured from these materials, corroborated the acceptance of those materials and techniques exhibiting the least dimensional change.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 283231     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90013-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of effect of tray space on the accuracy of condensation silicone, addition silicone and polyether impression materials: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Varun Kumar; Himanshu Aeran
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-06-04

2.  Drying time of tray adhesive for adequate tensile bond strength between polyvinylsiloxane impression and tray resin material.

Authors:  Myong-Hee Yi; Joon-Sung Shim; Keun-Woo Lee; Moon-Kyu Chung
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Modified Technique for Making Auto-polymerized Polymethylmethacrylate Resin Custom Tray.

Authors:  Ahila Singaravel Chidambaranathan; Ramesh Reddy; Suresh Rajendran; Muthu Kumar Balasubramaniam
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

4.  Accuracy of a separating foil impression using a novel polyolefin foil compared to a custom tray and a stock tray technique.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Pastoret; Gabriel Krastl; Julia Bühler; Roland Weiger; Nicola Ursula Zitzmann
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Clinical evaluation of final impressions from three-dimensional printed custom trays.

Authors:  Yuchun Sun; Hu Chen; Hong Li; Kehui Deng; Tian Zhao; Yong Wang; Yongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of the fit of cast gold crowns fabricated from the digital and the conventional impression techniques.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Yun; Young-Chan Jeon; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Different Types of Impression Trays and Impression Materials on the Accuracy of Open Tray Implant Impressions: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sonam Gupta; Aparna Ichalangod Narayan; Dhanasekar Balakrishnan
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-02-27

8.  Effect of multiple pouring on the accuracy of casts made using 3D-printed custom trays with different spacer thicknesses: A research study.

Authors:  Sara Tavakolizadeh; Mohammad Javad Razaghi; Pedram Pakravan; Majid Sedaghat Monfared; Elaheh Beyabanaki; Rahab Ghoveizi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2020

9.  Accuracy of different putty-wash impression techniques with various spacer thickness.

Authors:  Anshul Chugh; Aman Arora; Vijay Pratap Singh
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2012-02-24

10.  Effect of cervical relining of acrylic resin copings on the accuracy of stone dies obtained using a polyether impression material.

Authors:  André Tomazini Gomes de Sá; César Antunes de Freitas; Fátima Cristina de Sá; Wagner José Silva Ursi; Tânia Christina Simões; Márcia Furtado Antunes de Freitas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.