Yu Kawazoe1, Kyohei Miyamoto2, Takeshi Morimoto3, Tomonori Yamamoto4, Akihiro Fuke5, Atsunori Hashimoto6, Hiroyuki Koami7, Satoru Beppu8, Yoichi Katayama9, Makoto Itoh10, Yoshinori Ohta11, Hitoshi Yamamura12. 1. Division of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate school of Medicine, Sendai, Japan. 2. Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan. 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan. 4. Department of Trauma and Critical Care Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 5. Emergency and Urgent Medical Care Center, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan. 6. Emergency and Critical Care Center, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan. 7. Advanced Emergency Care Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan. 8. Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan. 9. Department of Emergency Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan. 10. Department of Anesthesiology, Yamaguchi Grand Medical Center, Hofu, Japan. 11. Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan. 12. Department of Disaster and Critical Care Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Abstract
Importance: Dexmedetomidine provides sedation for patients undergoing ventilation; however, its effects on mortality and ventilator-free days have not been well studied among patients with sepsis. Objectives: To examine whether a sedation strategy with dexmedetomidine can improve clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis undergoing ventilation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted at 8 intensive care units in Japan from February 2013 until January 2016 among 201 consecutive adult patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either sedation with dexmedetomidine (n = 100) or sedation without dexmedetomidine (control group; n = 101). Other agents used in both groups were fentanyl, propofol, and midazolam. Main Outcomes and Measures: The co-primary outcomes were mortality and ventilator-free days (over a 28-day duration). Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8), sedation control, occurrence of delirium and coma, intensive care unit stay duration, renal function, inflammation, and nutrition state were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results: Of the 203 screened patients, 201 were randomized. The mean age was 69 years (SD, 14 years); 63% were male. Mortality at 28 days was not significantly different in the dexmedetomidine group vs the control group (19 patients [22.8%] vs 28 patients [30.8%]; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.38-1.22; P = .20). Ventilator-free days over 28 days were not significantly different between groups (dexmedetomidine group: median, 20 [interquartile range, 5-24] days; control group: median, 18 [interquartile range, 0.5-23] days; P = .20). The dexmedetomidine group had a significantly higher rate of well-controlled sedation during mechanical ventilation (range, 17%-58% vs 20%-39%; P = .01); other outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Adverse events occurred in 8 (8%) and 3 (3%) patients in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the use of dexmedetomidine compared with no dexmedetomidine did not result in statistically significant improvement in mortality or ventilator-free days. However, the study may have been underpowered for mortality, and additional research may be needed to evaluate this further. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01760967.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Dexmedetomidine provides sedation for patients undergoing ventilation; however, its effects on mortality and ventilator-free days have not been well studied among patients with sepsis. Objectives: To examine whether a sedation strategy with dexmedetomidine can improve clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis undergoing ventilation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted at 8 intensive care units in Japan from February 2013 until January 2016 among 201 consecutive adult patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either sedation with dexmedetomidine (n = 100) or sedation without dexmedetomidine (control group; n = 101). Other agents used in both groups were fentanyl, propofol, and midazolam. Main Outcomes and Measures: The co-primary outcomes were mortality and ventilator-free days (over a 28-day duration). Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8), sedation control, occurrence of delirium and coma, intensive care unit stay duration, renal function, inflammation, and nutrition state were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results: Of the 203 screened patients, 201 were randomized. The mean age was 69 years (SD, 14 years); 63% were male. Mortality at 28 days was not significantly different in the dexmedetomidine group vs the control group (19 patients [22.8%] vs 28 patients [30.8%]; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.38-1.22; P = .20). Ventilator-free days over 28 days were not significantly different between groups (dexmedetomidine group: median, 20 [interquartile range, 5-24] days; control group: median, 18 [interquartile range, 0.5-23] days; P = .20). The dexmedetomidine group had a significantly higher rate of well-controlled sedation during mechanical ventilation (range, 17%-58% vs 20%-39%; P = .01); other outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Adverse events occurred in 8 (8%) and 3 (3%) patients in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the use of dexmedetomidine compared with no dexmedetomidine did not result in statistically significant improvement in mortality or ventilator-free days. However, the study may have been underpowered for mortality, and additional research may be needed to evaluate this further. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01760967.
Authors: Eduard E Vasilevskis; E Wesley Ely; Theodore Speroff; Brenda T Pun; Leanne Boehm; Robert S Dittus Journal: Chest Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Stephan M Jakob; Esko Ruokonen; R Michael Grounds; Toni Sarapohja; Chris Garratt; Stuart J Pocock; J Raymond Bratty; Jukka Takala Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: E Wesley Ely; Ayumi Shintani; Brenda Truman; Theodore Speroff; Sharon M Gordon; Frank E Harrell; Sharon K Inouye; Gordon R Bernard; Robert S Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-04-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J L Vincent; A de Mendonça; F Cantraine; R Moreno; J Takala; P M Suter; C L Sprung; F Colardyn; S Blecher Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Timothy D Girard; John P Kress; Barry D Fuchs; Jason W W Thomason; William D Schweickert; Brenda T Pun; Darren B Taichman; Jan G Dunn; Anne S Pohlman; Paul A Kinniry; James C Jackson; Angelo E Canonico; Richard W Light; Ayumi K Shintani; Jennifer L Thompson; Sharon M Gordon; Jesse B Hall; Robert S Dittus; Gordon R Bernard; E Wesley Ely Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-01-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Juliana Barr; Gilles L Fraser; Kathleen Puntillo; E Wesley Ely; Céline Gélinas; Joseph F Dasta; Judy E Davidson; John W Devlin; John P Kress; Aaron M Joffe; Douglas B Coursin; Daniel L Herr; Avery Tung; Bryce R H Robinson; Dorrie K Fontaine; Michael A Ramsay; Richard R Riker; Curtis N Sessler; Brenda Pun; Yoanna Skrobik; Roman Jaeschke Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Christopher G Hughes; Christina S Boncyk; Deborah J Culley; Lee A Fleisher; Jacqueline M Leung; David L McDonagh; Tong J Gan; Matthew D McEvoy; Timothy E Miller Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Joanna L Stollings; Jennifer L Thompson; Benjamin A Ferrell; Mika Scheinin; Grant R Wilkinson; Christopher G Hughes; Ayumi K Shintani; E Wesley Ely; Timothy D Girard; Pratik P Pandharipande; Mayur B Patel Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Ajit P Limaye; Renee D Stapleton; Lili Peng; Scott R Gunn; Louise E Kimball; Robert Hyzy; Matthew C Exline; D Clark Files; Peter E Morris; Stephen K Frankel; Mark E Mikkelsen; Duncan Hite; Kyle B Enfield; Jay Steingrub; James O'Brien; Polly E Parsons; Joseph Cuschieri; Richard G Wunderink; David L Hotchkin; Ying Q Chen; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Michael Boeckh Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael Hessler; Philip-Helge Arnemann; Laura Seidel; Tim Kampmeier; Sebastian Rehberg; Christian Ertmer Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Wesley H Self; Dandan Liu; Nicholas Strayer; Stephan Russ; Michael J Ward; Nathan I Shapiro; Todd W Rice; Matthew W Semler Journal: Chest Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 9.410