Literature DB >> 31422445

Circulatory effects of dexmedetomidine in early sepsis: a randomised controlled experimental study.

Zoi Aidoni1, Chryssa Pourzitaki2,3, Eleni Stamoula4, Katerina Kotzampassi5, Georgia Tsaousi1, George Kazakos6, Christophoros N Foroulis7, Charisios Skourtis1, Dimitrios G Vasilakos1, Vassilios Grosomanidis1.   

Abstract

We designed this experimental study with a view to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on cardiac performance and systemic and peripheral hemodynamics in healthy and early-stage endotoxemia swine models. Our study hypothesis was that DEX can ensure hemodynamic stability during the course of endotoxemia. Thirty-two male pigs (25-27 kg) were assigned into four groups: (1) no intervention (group A), (2) DEX 0.8 μg/kg was administered in non-septic animals (group B), (3) sepsis induced by intravenous Escherichia coli endotoxin (group C) and (4) DEX 0.8 μg/kg was administered in septic animals (group D). Hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate, mean blood pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery pressures, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance and cardiac output were continuously recorded. Central venous oxygen saturation was also measured in order to obtain a complete evaluation of cardiovascular response to sepsis. Heart rate was decreased, whilst mean arterial pressure decrease was alleviated after DEX administration in septic animals. In addition, central venous pressure was stable in animals with sepsis after DEX infusion. Sepsis dramatically elevated pulmonary function indicators but DEX succeeded in ameliorating this effect. The important decrease measured in central venous oxygen saturation in both sepsis groups reflected the decreased perfusion of tissues that takes place at the end of early sepsis. Our findings support the hypothesis that DEX has beneficial effects on heart rate and pulmonary artery pressure, whilst reduction in systemic blood pressure occurs at acceptable levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circulation; Dexmedetomidine; Hemodynamic; In vivo; Sepsis; Swine model

Year:  2019        PMID: 31422445     DOI: 10.1007/s00210-019-01713-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol        ISSN: 0028-1298            Impact factor:   3.000


  48 in total

1.  Preliminary UK experience of dexmedetomidine, a novel agent for postoperative sedation in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  R M Venn; C J Bradshaw; R Spencer; D Brealey; E Caudwell; C Naughton; A Vedio; M Singer; R Feneck; D Treacher; S M Willatts; R M Grounds
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Effects of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ke Peng; Fu-Hai Ji; Hua-Yue Liu; Juan Zhang; Qing-Cai Chen; Ya-Hui Jiang
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.393

3.  Acute cor pulmonale in acute respiratory distress syndrome submitted to protective ventilation: incidence, clinical implications, and prognosis.

Authors:  A Vieillard-Baron; J M Schmitt; R Augarde; J L Fellahi; S Prin; B Page; A Beauchet; F Jardin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Dexmedetomidine alleviates LPS-induced septic cardiomyopathy via the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in mice.

Authors:  Weilan Kong; Kai Kang; Yang Gao; Haitao Liu; Xianglin Meng; Songliu Yang; Kaijiang Yu; Mingyan Zhao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Results of a pilot study on the effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine on inflammatory responses and intraabdominal pressure in severe sepsis.

Authors:  Muhittin Tasdogan; Dilek Memis; Necdet Sut; Mahmut Yuksel
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 9.452

6.  Dexmedetomidine as a sedative and analgesic adjuvant in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Georgia G Tsaousi; Chryssa Pourzitaki; Simone Aloisio; Federico Bilotta
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Juliana Barr; Gilles L Fraser; Kathleen Puntillo; E Wesley Ely; Céline Gélinas; Joseph F Dasta; Judy E Davidson; John W Devlin; John P Kress; Aaron M Joffe; Douglas B Coursin; Daniel L Herr; Avery Tung; Bryce R H Robinson; Dorrie K Fontaine; Michael A Ramsay; Richard R Riker; Curtis N Sessler; Brenda Pun; Yoanna Skrobik; Roman Jaeschke
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Risk Factors for Dexmedetomidine-Associated Hemodynamic Instability in Noncardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Authors:  Calvin J Ice; Heather A Personett; Erin N Frazee; Ross A Dierkhising; Rahul Kashyap; Richard A Oeckler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock.

Authors:  Paul R Mouncey; Tiffany M Osborn; G Sarah Power; David A Harrison; M Zia Sadique; Richard D Grieve; Rahi Jahan; Sheila E Harvey; Derek Bell; Julian F Bion; Timothy J Coats; Mervyn Singer; J Duncan Young; Kathryn M Rowan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Can venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide differences reflect microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock?

Authors:  Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón; Mauricio Umaña; William F Bermúdez; Diego F Bautista-Rincón; Juan D Valencia; Humberto J Madriñán; Glenn Hernandez; Alejandro Bruhn; César Arango-Dávila; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.