| Literature DB >> 28322306 |
Jinshun Xu1,2, Shuai Yuan1,3, Jilai Tian4, Kyle A Martin5, Jinhua Song6, Chenglong Li6,7, Zhigang Wang2, Jiayuh Lin4, Ting Si1,3, Ronald X Xu1,3.
Abstract
LLL12 exhibits high specificity for inhibiting STAT3 phosphorylation and dimerization, and inducing apoptosis to constitutively activated STAT3 cancer cells without cytotoxicity to normal cells with dormant STAT3. However, clinical deployment of LLL12 in cancer treatment is hindered by its low bioavailability and hypoxia-induced resistance. To overcome these limitations, we encapsulate both oxygen and LLL12 in stimuli responsive microdroplets (SRMs) by a gas-driven coaxial flow focusing (CFF) process for ultrasound mediated treatment of hypoxic cancer cells. Our benchtop experiments demonstrate that the CFF process is able to produce SRMs with uniform size distribution, large oxygen loading capacity, high LLL12 encapsulation efficiency, well protection of bioactivity, and steadily long shelf time. The in vitro therapeutic studies in pancreatic cancer cells (PANC-1 and CAPAN-1) demonstrate the immediate release of oxygen and LLL12 in exposure to therapeutic ultrasound pulses as well as the improved anticancer effects under hypoxic conditions. The findings suggest that the proposed oxygen and LLL12 loaded SRMs provide a promising drug delivery strategy for more effective treatment of hypoxic cancer cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28322306 PMCID: PMC5359616 DOI: 10.1038/srep44908
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Chemical structure of LLL12; (b) Schematic illustration of the gas-driven CFF setup.
Figure 2(a) Droplet diameter as a function of Qi for Pf = 9 kPa, Qo = 50 ml/h; (b) Droplet diameter as a function of Pf for Qi = 3 ml/h, Qo = 50 ml/h; (c,d) Microscopic image and size distribution of oxygen and LLL12 loaded microdroplets (OLMs); (e,f) Microscopic image and size distribution of LLL12 loaded microdroplets (LMs); (g,h) Size change over time for OLMs at 4 °Cand 37 °C respectively; (i,j) Size change over time for LMs at 4 °Cand 37 °C respectively. Error bars in data represent S.D. (n = 3).
Figure 3(a) Encapsulation efficiency (EE) and loading capacity (LC) of LLL12 in OLMs and LMs, respectively; (c,d) Release of LLL12 from LMs and OLMs respectively with and without ultrasound exposure. Arrows indicate the time points for ultrasound mediation; (e) Oxygen release from OLMs before and after ultrasound exposure at the time-point of 3 min (arrow); (f) Bioavailabilities of LLL12 in microsome solution with and without SRM encapsulation. P > 0.05, *P < 0.05 with others. Error bars in all data represent S.D. (n = 3).
Figure 4Cancer cell colony formations after different treatments at normoxic and hypoxic conditions. (a) PANC-1 colony photograph microscopy after treatment two weeks among different groups; (b,c) Analysis comparison of PANC-1 colony numbers counted 2 weeks post treatment in 21% and 1% oxygen, respectively; (d,e) Analysis comparison of CAPAN-1 colony numbers counted 2 weeks post treatment in 21% and 1% oxygen, respectively. P > 0.05, ***P < 0.001 versus other groups. Error bars in all data represent S.D. (n = 3).