Literature DB >> 28322245

Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes correlate with improved survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Dongxian Jiang1, Yalan Liu1, Hao Wang2, Haixing Wang1, Qi Song1, Akesu Sujie1, Jie Huang1, Yifan Xu1, Haiying Zeng1, Lijie Tan2, Yingyong Hou1,3, Chen Xu1.   

Abstract

We undertook a study of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in a large and relatively homogeneous group of patients with completely resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of 235 ESCC tumours were evaluated for density of TILs in intratumoural (iTIL) and stromal compartments (sTIL). Foxp3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells in tumoural and stromal areas were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Of the 235 tumours, high sTIL (>10%), and iTIL (>10%) were observed in 101 (43.0%) and 98 (41.7%), respectively. The median follow-up period was 36.0 months (95% CI 29.929-42.071). Univariate analysis revealed that sTIL (>10%), iTIL (>20%), vessels involvement, lymph node metastasis, and clinical stage were significantly associated with postoperative outcome. In multivariate analysis, high sTIL (HR: 0.664, P = 0.019 for Disease free survival; HR: 0.608, P = 0.005 for Overall survival) was identified as independent better prognostic factor. Further analysis, sTIL was identified as independently prognostic factor in Stage III-IVa disease, which was not found in Stage I-II disease. Our study demonstrated that sTIL was associated with better ESCC patients' survival, especially in Stage III-IVa disease. Assessment of sTIL could be useful to discriminate biological behavior for ESCC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28322245      PMCID: PMC5359661          DOI: 10.1038/srep44823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Esophageal carcinoma (EC) is one of the most prevalent life threatening malignancies1, which ranks as the eighth most frequently diagnosed cancer, and the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide23. China alone accounts for more than 70% of global EC, and 95% is esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), with an estimated 478,000 new cases and 375,000 new deaths in 201545. As the survival of ESCC remains poor, prognostic markers are required to discriminate the different biologic behavior of ESCC in order to make the following clinical strategies. Since Virchow first described the association of lymphocyte infiltration with solid tumours in 18636, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are increasingly involved in determining the progression and aggressiveness of tumour. TILs are composed of various lymphocytes with diverse activities. The most common lymphocytes are CD8+, CD4+, and Foxp3+ T cells. Of them, CD8+ T cells play a critical role in antitumour immunity by releasing perforins and granzymes, which may contribute to tumour cell death7. CD4+ T cells release immunoregulatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF that may induce cytolytic T cell responses in tumours. Foxp3+ T cells have the ability to suppress or regulate cell-mediate immunity8. After infiltrating solid tumours, Foxp3+ T cells can inhibit the activity of cytotoxic T cells through cell-to-cell contact. Emerging evidence suggests that the amount of T lymphocyte infiltration of primary tumours consistently predicts favorable outcomes in a number of tumour types, including breast cancer9, head and neck cancer10, non-small cell lung cancer11, colorectal cancer12 and gastric cancer13. However, tumour progression, which may occur in the presence of substantial lymphocytic infiltration, suggests that T cells are not capable of providing effective immune responses to control tumour growth in some types of cancer14. What’s more, regarding the infiltration of CD4+, CD8+, Foxp3+ T cells, there are also conflicting results. For example, some studies showed an association between increased numbers of CD8+ T cells and longer survival101516, while others showed an association with shorter survival1718. A few initial studies examined prognostic implications of TILs found in ESCC. Schumacher et al. suggested the presence of TILs was associated with improved survival in a cohort of ESCC patients (n = 33)19. Yoshioka et al. found TILs were not associated with improved long-term survival, however20. Therefore, the prognostic value of TILs in ESCC remains to be established and the composition of TILs density in ESCC are yet to be assessed. We undertook a study of TILs in a large and relatively homogeneous group of patients with completely resected ESCC to better determine correlations with clinical prognostic variables and to evaluate the overall impact of specific TILs populations on patient outcomes.

Results

Study patients

A total of 235 patients were included in the study. The median age at the time of surgery was 62 years (range, 37–83 years) and was predominately male (83.8%). Of all patients, 57.0% were non-smokers and 42.6% were smokers. On the basis of the AJCC Staging Manual (seventh edition), 4 (1.7%) cases were histologically graded as well differentiated, 133 (56.6%) cases moderately differentiated, and 98 (41.7%) poorly differentiated. Vessel and nerve invasion (once present with no matter of the quantification) were identified in 46 (19.6%) and 69 (29.4%) tumours, respectively. Lymph node metastasis was identified in 124 (52.8%) patients. Among these patients, 136 (57.9%) patients had AJCC pathologic stage I–II disease, and 99 (42.1%) stage III-IVa disease, which were located in the upper esophagus (5.1%), middle esophagus (47.7%) or lower esophagus (43.4%) (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinicopathological factors and association with TILs in ESCC.

 No.sTIL (>10%)P valueiTIL (>10%)P value
LowHighLowHigh
Sex   0.634  0.761
 Female382315 2315 
 Male19711186 11483 
Age   0.472  0.904
 <60975839 5740 
 ≥601397762 8058 
Differentiation   0.377  0.023
 well431 31 
 moderate1337162 8746 
 poor986038 4751 
Vessel invasion   0.798  0.545
 No18910782 11277 
 Yes462719 2521 
Nerve invasion   0.498  0.518
 No1669769 9967 
 Yes693732 3831 
Lymph node metastasis   0.475  0.383
 No1116645 6843 
 Yes1246856 6955 
Site   0.026  0.210
 Upper1248 48 
 Middle1127339 6745 
 Lower1025250 5943 
Stage   0.699  0.646
 I–II1367957 8155 
 III–IVa995544 5643 
Smoking   0.624  0.570
 No1347856 8054 
 Yes1005545 5644 

sTIL, stromal infiltrating lymphocytes; iTIL, intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes.

The relationship of TILs and clinicopathological characteristics

Representative TILs staining is shown in Fig. 1. Of the 235 tumours, high sTIL (>10%), iTIL (>10%) and iTIL (>20%) were observed in 101 (43.0%), 98 (41.7%), and 23 (9.8%) respectively. The relationship of patient and tumour characteristics to TILs involvement is presented in Table 1. High sTIL (>10%) density was associated with tumour site (P = 0.026), and high iTIL (>10%) was observed in tumours with poorer differentiation (P = 0.024). No statistically significant correlation was observed with sex, age, vessel and nerve involvement, lymph node metastasis, clinical stage, or smoking behavior (Table 1).
Figure 1

Representative views of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and CD8 expression in ESCC.

Examples of low sTIL (A) and high sTIL (B) in stromal compartments (magnification 10×), low iTIL (C) and high iTIL (D) in intraepithelial compartments (magnification 40×), CD8+ low sTIL (E) and CD8+ high sTIL (F) in stromal compartments (magnification 10×), CD8+ low iTIL (G) and CD8+ high iTIL (H) in intraepithelial compartments (magnification 40×). White and black arrows indicate tumoural and stromal area respectively.

The median number of CD4+ sTIL and iTIL was 2% and 1%, respectively. The median number of CD8+ sTIL and iTIL was 5%, the median number of Foxp3+ sTIL and iTIL also was 5%. Among high sTIL (>10%) cases, 16 (15.8%) were high CD4+ sTIL (>10%), 58 (57.4%) were high CD8+ sTIL (>10%), and 3 (3.0%) were high Foxp3+ sTIL (>10%). Among high iTIL (>10%) cases, no cases were comprised of high CD4+ iTIL (>10%), 58 (59.2%) were high CD8+ iTIL (>10%), and 5 (5.1%) were high Foxp3+ iTIL (>10%). Both sTIL and iTIL were statistically associated with CD8+ cells (P < 0.05).

Prognostic significance of TILs

The median follow-up period was 36.0 months (95% CI 29.929–42.071). There were 142 (60.4%) instances of tumour progression documented. Median DFS was 24.0 months. A total of 139 patients (59.1%) died of ESCC during the follow up, and median OS was 32.0 months. To clarify whether TILs could have a prognostic value, univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed in all cases. Our univariate analysis revealed that sTIL (>10%), iTIL (>20%), vessel involvement, lymph node metastasis and clinical stage were significantly associated with postoperative outcome as described in Table 2.
Table 2

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of patient and tumour factors with DFS and OS.

 P valueDFSP valueOS
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Univariate analysis
sTIL (>10%)0.0830.743 (0.531–1.040)0.0370.697 (0.496–0.979)
iTIL (>10%)0.5081.119 (0.802–1.561)0.6161.090 (0.777–1.530)
iTIL (>20%)0.0500.508 (0.259–0.999)0.0420.477 (0.234–0.974)
sCD4 (>10%)0.7410.897 (0.472–1.707)0.4900.788 (0.401–1.549)
sCD8 (>10%)0.7910.953 (0.667–1.361)0.5690.900 (0.626–1.294)
iCD8 (>10%)0.7060.929 (0.634–1.361)0.5850.896 (0.603–1.330)
sFoxp3 (>10%)0.6410.717 (0.177–2.900)0.6041.447 (0.358–5.854)
iFoxp3 (>10%)0.4780.603 (0.149–2.437)0.2390.307 (0.043–2.194)
Sex0.9910.999 (0.799–1.249)0.9011.015 (0.808–1.274)
Age0.9270.985 (0.705–1.375)0.9670.993 (0.709–1.390)
Grade0.1061.300 (0.946–1.788)0.1421.273 (0.922–1.757)
Vessel invasion0.0021.793 (1.235–2.605)<0.0011.996 (1.371–2.906)
Nerve invasion0.4011.164 (0.817–1.659)0.2261.248 (0.872–1.785)
Lymph node metastasis<0.0013.128 (2.178–4.494)<0.0013.476 (2.404–5.026)
Stage<0.0013.274 (2.330–4.600)<0.0013.580 (2.536–5.053)
Site0.0420.758 (0.580–0.990)0.0660.775 (0.590–1.017)
Smoking0.3691.164 (0.836–1.619)0.1781.257 (0.901–1.754)
Multivariate analysis
sTIL (>10%)0.0190.664 (0.473–0.934)0.0050.608 (0.431–0.857)
iTIL (>20%)0.0950.561 (0.284–1.106)0.0870.534 (0.260–1.095)
Vessel invovlement0.5061.142 (0.773–1.687)0.3271.217 (0.822–1.803)
Lymph node metastasis0.0101.950 (1.169–3.252)0.0042.118 (1.265–3.545)
Stage0.0042.040 (1.256–3.312)0.0022.119 (1.303–3.446)

DFS, disease free survival. OS, disease specific overall survival. HR, hazard ratio. CI, confidence interval. sTIL, stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iTIL, intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD4, CD4+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD8, CD8+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iCD8, CD8+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sFoxp3, Foxp3+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iFoxp3, Foxp3+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes.

In the multivariate analysis, high sTIL (HR: 0.664, P = 0.019 for DFS; HR: 0.608, P = 0.005 for OS) was identified as independent better prognostic factor, and lymph node metastasis (HR: 1.950, P = 0.010 for DFS; HR: 2.118, P = 0.004 for OS) and clinical stage (HR: 2.040, P = 0.004 for DFS; HR: 2.119, P = 0.002 for OS) were identified as independent worse prognostic factors as shown in Table 2. Representative Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to these factors are shown in Fig. 2. Among 101 patients with high sTIL (>10%), a significantly better prognosis was observed, with a median DFS and OS of 29.0 and 42.0 months compared to 24.0 and 30.0 months for 134 patients with low sTIL (≤10%) (P = 0.076 and 0.033).
Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves of DFS and OS revealing prognostic significance of TILs in ESCC.

Among 235 patients, a significantly better prognosis was observed in patients with high sTIL (>10%) (P = 0.076 and 0.033) (A and B). In patients with Stage I-II ESCC, sTIL (>10%) was not associated with DFS (P = 0.307) and OS (P = 0.182) (C and D). In patients with Stage III-IVa disease, sTIL (>10%) was associated with improved DFS (P = 0.023) and OS (P = 0.005) (E and F).

Survival analyses based on clinical stage

In patients with Stage III-IVa disease, sTIL (>10%) was associated with improved DFS (P = 0.023) and OS (P = 0.005) (Fig. 2). Among 44 patients with high sTIL (>10%), a significantly better prognosis was observed, with a median DFS and OS of 20.0 and 26.0 months compared to 13.0 and 21.0 months for 55 patients with low sTIL (≤10%). Upon univariate analysis, sTIL, iTIL (>20%), sCD8 (>10%) and site were associated with DFS and OS, and on multivariate analysis, sTIL and site were identified as independently prognostic factor (Table 3).
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of patient and tumour factors with DFS and OS in Stage III-IVa patients.

 P valueDFSP valueOS
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Univariate analysis
sTIL (>10%)0.0310.615 (0.395–0.957)0.0070.544 (0.349–0.850)
iTIL (>10%)0.6200.895 (0.577–1.389)0.5570.875 (0.561–1.366)
iTIL (>20%)0.0460.309 (0.097–0.980)0.0610.331 (0.104–1.052)
sCD4 (>10%)0.5210.787 (0.379–1.635)0.3990.730 (0.351–1.518)
sCD8 (>10%)0.0780.654 (0.408–1.048)0.0360.599 (0.371–0.968)
iCD8 (>10%)0.3290.780 (0.474–1.284)0.3140.767 (0.458–1.285)
sFoxp3 (>10%)0.1820.260 (0.036–1.878)0.1600.241 (0.033–1.749)
Sex0.3360.710 (0.354–1.425)0.4490.868 (0.600–1.254)
Age0.4091.202 (0.777–1.859)0.3401.238 (0.799–1.919)
Grade0.9220.980 (0.658–1.461)0.8040.950 (0.633–1.426)
Vessel invasion0.5961.128 (0.723–1.760)0.3661.230 (0.786–1.925)
Nerve invasion0.3221.249 (0.804–1.939)0.2451.300 (0.836–2.021)
Lymph node metastasis0.1010.521 (0.239–1.137)0.2080.606 (0.278–1.321)
Site0.0110.620 (0.429–0.896)0.0130.622 (0.427–0.905)
Smoking0.2950.792 (0.513–1.224)0.2960.791 (0.510–1.228)
Multivariate analysis    
sTIL (>10%)0.0810.671 (0.428–1.051)0.0320.535 (0.303–0.947)
iTIL (>20%)0.0560.322 (0.101–1.028)0.0710.341 (0.106–1.095)
sCD8 (>10%)  0.7851.091 (0.584–2.040)
Site0.038 0.032 
 Middle0.2330.557 (0.213–1.457)0.1440.479 (0.178–1.285)
 Lower0.0360.359 (0.138–0.934)0.0220.311 (0.114–0.848)

DFS, disease free survival. OS, disease specific overall survival. HR, hazard ratio. CI, confidence interval. sTIL, stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iTIL, intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD4, CD4+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD8, CD8+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iCD8, CD8+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sFoxp3, Foxp3+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iFoxp3, Foxp3+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes.

In patients with Stage I-II ESCC, sTIL (>10%) was not associated with DFS (P = 0.307) and OS (P = 0.182) (Fig. 2). Upon univariate and multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis and site were associated with DFS and OS (Table 4).
Table 4

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of patient and tumour factors with DFS and OS in Stage I-II patients.

 P valueDFSP valueOS
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Univariate analysis
sTIL (>10%)0.3150.766 (0.455–1.289)0.1890.700 (0.412–1.191)
iTIL (>10%)0.3791.258 (0.754–2.097)0.4881.225 (0.726–2.067)
iTIL (>20%)0.6240.810 (0.348–1.883)0.4600.707 (0.282–1.772)
sCD4 (>10%)0.4000.546 (0.133–2.235)0.1920.268 (0.037–1.938)
sCD8 (>10%)0.5541.180 (0.683–2.037)0.7301.103 (0.631–1.929)
iCD8 (>10%)0.8980.962 (0.529–1.750)0.8170.930 (0.501–1.724)
sFoxp3 (>10%)0.5821.742 (0.241–12.590)0.6041.689 (0.233–12.220)
iFoxp3 (>10%)0.9811.018 (0.248–4.173)0.5360.535 (0.074–3.871)
Sex0.4660.895 (0.663–1.207)0.3690.871 (0.645–1.177)
Age0.7291.099 (0.646–1.868)0.5921.160 (0.674–1.994)
Grade0.0641.600 (0.974–2.631)0.1241.487 (0.897–2.465)
Vessel invasion0.6811.194 (0.513–2.777)0.5441.300 (0.558–3.031)
Nerve invasion0.0380.435 (0.197–0.956)0.0740.487 (0.221–1.074)
Lymph node metastasis<0.0012.689 (1.600–4.518)<0.0012.970 (1.757–5.021)
Site0.0340.646 (0.431–0.968)0.0490.660 (0.436–0.998)
Smoking0.6171.142 (0.678–1.922)0.4371.232 (0.728–2.085)
Multivariate analysis
Nerve involvement0.1680.568 (0.255–1.268)  
Lymph node metastasis0.0012.382 (1.403–4.044)<0.0012.856 (1.685–4.839)
Site0.010 0.010 
 Middle0.2741.927 (0.595–6.237)0.2501.997 (0.615–6.484)
 Lower0.7220.799 (0.232–2.749)0.7490.816 (0.236–2.823)

DFS, disease free survival. OS, disease specific overall survival. HR, hazard ratio. CI, confidence interval. sTIL, stromal infiltrating lymphocytes; iTIL, intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD4, CD4+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD8, CD8+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes; iCD8, CD8+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sFoxp3, Foxp3+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes; iFoxp3, Foxp3+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes.

Discussion

The aim of our study was to examine the prognostic relevance of TILs involvement in patients with ESCC. We found sTIL appears to have a superior prognostic impact when compared with iTIL, which is previously reported in other tumours2122. In this study, we confirmed that sTIL constitutes a robust and independent prognostic marker in ESCC, with increasing sTIL predictive of a significantly lower risk of recurrence or metastasis, and overall mortality. At a median follow-up of 36.0 months, sTIL was associated with OS, with an estimated HR of 0.697 (P = 0.037). Importantly, the prognostic significance of sTIL was independent of known prognostic factors, and in our population of I-II stage and III-IVa stage diseases, it improved outcome prediction even more significantly when clinical stage was taken into account. Given the increasing evidence of the importance of TILs in influencing prognosis of patients with tumours, the International TILS Working Group recently published a guideline to standardize TILs evaluation23. The working group states that evaluating sTIL as a continuous variable will allow for more accurate statistical analysis, but in practice, most pathologists will not report specific values. Simplicity is needed for a pathological methodology to be accepted widely. Typically, TILs are reported to the nearest 10–15%23. And some studies recommended TILs should be defined as >50% TILs24. Our work suggests that evaluating sTIL as a noncontinuous variable can be considered. In the study, we used a cutoff value of 10% to define low and high TILs. Statistical analyses could not be performed using a cut-off of 50% as few patients had TILs percentages this high. At the median follow-up period of 36 months, OS analysis (log-rank) showed sTIL to be prognostically significant. This is consistent with work from Hida and Ohi25, who recently published a letter to the editor commenting that the methodology proposed by the TILs working group is too detailed for routine use. They proposed a simpler method whereby they quantified TILs as low, intermediate, or high using 10, 10 to 50% or more than 50%. In a series of 164 consecutive triple-negative breast cancer specimens, they showed that using such a three-grade scale for TILs quantification, they could stratify patients with respect to survival. It is well recognized that cytotoxic CD4+, CD8+ and Foxp3+ TIL constitute the most important effector mechanisms of anti-tumour immunity. However, some studies have found CD4+, CD8+ and Foxp3+ TIL not to be a better, more reproducible prognostic parameter. For example, in NSCLC, CD8+ TIL had ever been identified as better, poor, or no prognostic role2627. In esophageal cancer, Schumacher et al. observed CD8+ iTIL to correlate with improved survival19. In contrast, Zingg et al. did not find any independent associations between CD8+ TIL subsets and survival28. Tumours infiltrated with Foxp3+ T cells were reported to have a worse prognosis by some investigators2930, but others indicated that tumours with Foxp3+ T cells had better prognosis or non-prognosis role1631. It is true that the prognostic value of TIL subtyping continues to be debated. Therefore, whether these markers add value beyond general sTIL enumeration on H&E-stained slides has not been established. Indeed, the working group stated that outside the research setting, routine use of IHC to differentiate lymphocyte populations is not recommended24. In our study, associations of CD4+, CD8+ and Foxp3+ TIL and outcome were also observed, and did not reach statistical significance. We found the density of stromal and intratumoural CD8+ TIL was significantly higher than CD4+ and Foxp3+ TIL. We speculated CD8+ T lymphocytes has the potent of cytotoxic effects in ESCC. Further studies are needed to explore the prognostic significance of different subsets of TILs in ESCC. We have included cancer patients with all four stages (Stage I, II, II and IVa) in this study. More importantly, our study is the first report on the prognostic influence of TILs in both earlier (I+II) and later (III-IVa) stage ESCC. Some researches have found that the prognostic significance of biomarkers may differ in patients at varing points in the disease3233. Previous researches indicated that TILs analysis is a better predictor of patient survival at earlier stages of disease. For example, Ruffini and Horne et al. observed that TILs were associated with a significant survival advantage in Stage I NSCLC3435. However, In our study, the prognostic effect was not statistically different in earlier stage ESCC (DFS P = 0.307 and OS P = 0.182), as some researchers reported in early breast cancer14. Therefore, the impact of TILs on I+II stage ESCC remains to be established. As to Stage III-IVa ESCC, sTIL (>10%) was associated with improved DFS (P = 0.023) and OS (P = 0.005). In Stage III NSCLC, Feng and Lee at al. found that the TILs was independently associated with a favorable prognosis3637. It is generally known that the conventional factors are insufficient for understanding the biological nature of III-IVa disease. TIL, with the consideration of both tumour and host defense, may provide clinically informative prognostic biomarker. Although our findings require further validation, it supports the concept that immune modulation could be particularly beneficial in improving clinical outcome for Stage III-IVa ESCC. The patient prognosis after complete resection for Stage III-IVa ESCC remains a significant concern; the 5-year OS rates range from 10% to 30%. Our findings provided the impetus for identifying patients (low TILs) who are at high risk of recurrence and exploring novel therapeutic approaches for improving patient survival. High and low TILs ESCC may each reflect a distinct tumour cell biology that likely has markedly different susceptibility to immunotherapy. The experimental evidence supporting this notion awaits further investigation. In summary, to our knowledge, the study is the first investigation of the prognostic role of TILs in a large series of ESCC patients. Our study showed that high sTIL is an independent, favorable prognostic factor in patients with surgically resected ESCC, especially III-IVa patients. To develop immune targeting drugs in future, more knowledge regarding the heterogeneous functions, homing, and regulatory mechanisms of TILs is needed.

Materials and Methods

Patients and sample selection

In this retrospective study, 235 unselected ESCC patients who received curative resection without preoperative chemotherapy at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China, between 2007 and 2010 were included. Clinicopathological information of patients in this survey was collected from clinical records and pathology reports. The local Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital approved the protocol of this study, which was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Tissue microarray construction

Tissue microarrays (TMA) were constructed as previously described38. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides from tissue blocks had been reviewed for adequacy of the representative areas of interest with a high density of tumour cells. The corresponding regions were marked on archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks. The representative areas (2 mm wide and 6 mm long) were extracted, with at least three cores taken from different regions of the tumour, and then vertically planted into the recipient block one by one according to the corresponding location. The planting surface was aggregated on the aggregation instrument. An array was constructed with a maximum of 70 cores and a stomach core was used as an orientation marker.

Histologic evaluation of TIL

TILs were performed in H&E-stained FFPE sections, which were examined at ×10 and ×40 magnification fields using a conventional light microscope by two pathologists. Neither pathologist had any knowledge of the clinical information. Intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes (iTIL) was defined as the percentage of mononuclear cells within the epithelium of the invasive tumour cell nests. Stromal infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) was defined as the percentage of tumour stroma containing infiltrating lymphocytes (area occupied by mononuclear cells in tumor stroma/total stromal area). Here, in our study, more than 10% of either stromal or intratumoural TIL were defined as high TIL.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Three- to 5-μm thick ESCC tissues were consecutively cut, subsequently dewaxed and rehydrated through graded alcohols. Slides were immunohistochemically stained in Roche Ventana Benchmark XT automated slide stainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Roche, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Monoclonal and polyclonal anti-human antibodies were used for identification of CD4+ T cells (anti-CD4, 4B12, Dako), CD8+ T cells (anti-CD8, Ab4055, Abcam), and Foxp3+ T cells (anti-Foxp3, 236 A/E7, Abcam). Quantitative evaluation of CD4+, CD8+ and Foxp3+ T cells was performed in 10 most representative high-power fields (magnification 40×) per tissue section using a Leica DM2000 microscope (Leica Co, Germany). The number of cells with positive staining was counted manually in tumor areas and stromal areas. The results were carried out blindly to the clinical data.

Statistical analysis

The associations between TIL and clinicopathologic features were analyzed using the chi-square (χ2) test. Time-to-event outcomes were defined from date of initially curative resection to date of last follow-up, progression (disease free survival, DFS and disease specific overall survival, OS). Univariate analysis was based on the Cox proportional hazards regression model. A multivariate Cox forward stepwise regression model was used to detect independent predictors of survival. The survival curves were compared using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. All tests were two sided, and a P-value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistical significance. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Jiang, D. et al. Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes correlate with improved survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 7, 44823; doi: 10.1038/srep44823 (2017). Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  38 in total

1.  The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014.

Authors:  R Salgado; C Denkert; S Demaria; N Sirtaine; F Klauschen; G Pruneri; S Wienert; G Van den Eynden; F L Baehner; F Penault-Llorca; E A Perez; E A Thompson; W F Symmans; A L Richardson; J Brock; C Criscitiello; H Bailey; M Ignatiadis; G Floris; J Sparano; Z Kos; T Nielsen; D L Rimm; K H Allison; J S Reis-Filho; S Loibl; C Sotiriou; G Viale; S Badve; S Adams; K Willard-Gallo; S Loi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Stromal CD8+ T-cell Density—A Promising Supplement to TNM Staging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Tom Donnem; Sigurd M Hald; Erna-Elise Paulsen; Elin Richardsen; Samer Al-Saad; Thomas K Kilvaer; Odd Terje Brustugun; Aslaug Helland; Marius Lund-Iversen; Mette Poehl; Karen Ege Olsen; Henrik J Ditzel; Olfred Hansen; Khalid Al-Shibli; Yury Kiselev; Torkjel M Sandanger; Sigve Andersen; Francesco Pezzella; Roy M Bremnes; Lill-Tove Busund
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict response to chemotherapy in patients with advance non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Tiantuo Zhang; Jin Ye; Hongtao Li; Jing Huang; Xiaodong Li; Benquan Wu; Xubing Huang; Jinghui Hou
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  PD-L1 expression is a favorable prognostic factor in early stage non-small cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wendy A Cooper; Thang Tran; Ricardo E Vilain; Jason Madore; Christina I Selinger; Maija Kohonen-Corish; PoYee Yip; Bing Yu; Sandra A O'Toole; Brian C McCaughan; Jennifer H Yearley; Lisa G Horvath; Steven Kao; Michael Boyer; Richard A Scolyer
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Morphometric and morphologic evaluations in stage III non-small cell lung cancers. Prognostic significance of quantitative assessment of infiltrating lymphoid cells.

Authors:  T K Lee; R D Horner; J F Silverman; Y H Chen; C Jenny; C W Scarantino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Infiltration of CD8+ T cells in non-small cell lung cancer is associated with dedifferentiation of cancer cells, but not with prognosis.

Authors:  M Mori; H Ohtani; Y Naito; M Sagawa; M Sato; S Fujimura; H Nagura
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012.

Authors:  Melina Arnold; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Jacques Ferlay; David Forman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Infiltrating regulatory T cell numbers is not a factor to predict patient's survival in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; M Miyamoto; Y Cho; K Ishikawa; T Tsuchikawa; M Kadoya; L Li; R Mishra; K Ichinokawa; Y Shoji; Y Matsumura; T Shichinohe; S Hirano; T Shinohara; T Itoh; S Kondo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invasion is inhibited by Activin A in ACVRIB-positive cells.

Authors:  Holli A Loomans; Shanna A Arnold; Laura L Quast; Claudia D Andl
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  An alternative high output tissue microarray technique.

Authors:  Yuan Shi; Deming He; Yingyong Hou; Qin Hu; Chen Xu; Yalan Liu; Dongxian Jiang; Jieakesu Su; Haiying Zeng; Yunshan Tan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 2.644

View more
  22 in total

1.  Immune signature profiling identified predictive and prognostic factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Zhiliang Lu; Yun Che; Jingnan Wang; Shouguo Sun; Jianbing Huang; Shuangshuang Mao; Yuanyuan Lei; Zhaoli Chen; Jie He
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  Is there value of tumor stromal infiltrating lymphocytes for response assessment to chemoradiation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

Authors:  Xin Wang; Wang Jing; Steven H Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

3.  Pretreatment CT-Based Radiomics Signature as a Potential Imaging Biomarker for Predicting the Expression of PD-L1 and CD8+TILs in ESCC.

Authors:  Qiang Wen; Zhe Yang; Jian Zhu; Qingtao Qiu; Honghai Dai; Alei Feng; Ligang Xing
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Immune-based therapies in penile cancer.

Authors:  Vidhu B Joshi; Philippe E Spiess; Andrea Necchi; Curtis A Pettaway; Jad Chahoud
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 16.430

5.  Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in esophageal cancer: an updated meta-analysis of 30 studies with 5,122 patients.

Authors:  Yibo Gao; Wei Guo; Xiao Geng; Yidong Zhang; Guochao Zhang; Bin Qiu; Fengwei Tan; Qi Xue; Shugeng Gao; Jie He
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-07

6.  Analysis of tumor-infiltrating CD103 resident memory T-cell content in recurrent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jacqueline E Mann; Joshua D Smith; Andrew C Birkeland; Emily Bellile; Paul Swiecicki; Michelle Mierzwa; Steven B Chinn; Andrew G Shuman; Kelly M Malloy; Keith A Casper; Scott A McLean; Jeffery S Moyer; Gregory T Wolf; Carol R Bradford; Mark E Prince; Thomas E Carey; Jonathan B McHugh; Matthew E Spector; J Chad Brenner
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.968

7.  Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte Activation Gene-3 (LAG-3) Expression in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Yong-Dong Liu; Yi-Ling Luo; Bin-Liu Liu; Qi-Tao Huang; Fang Wang; Qian Zhong
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Leukaemia inhibitory factor is associated with treatment resistance in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Amy M Buckley; Niamh Lynam-Lennon; Susan A Kennedy; Margaret R Dunne; John J Aird; Emma K Foley; Niamh Clarke; Narayanasamy Ravi; Dermot O'Toole; John V Reynolds; Breandán N Kennedy; Jacintha O'Sullivan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-09-14

9.  Tumor-infiltrating plasma cells are the promising prognosis marker for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chengyun Yao; Hongliang Yu; Guoren Zhou; Jianhua Xu; Dayong Gu; Li Yin; Xia He; Hongping Xia
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.230

10.  Onodera's prognostic nutritional index correlates with tumor immune environment and survival in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma undergoing chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Ryoji Yoshida; Shunsuke Gohara; Junki Sakata; Yuichiro Matsuoka; Akiyuki Hirosue; Kenta Kawahara; Sho Kawaguchi; Yuka Nagao; Keisuke Yamana; Masashi Nagata; Daiki Fukuma; Ryo Toya; Ryuji Murakami; Akimitsu Hiraki; Masanori Shinohara; Hideki Nakayama
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.