| Literature DB >> 28322245 |
Dongxian Jiang1, Yalan Liu1, Hao Wang2, Haixing Wang1, Qi Song1, Akesu Sujie1, Jie Huang1, Yifan Xu1, Haiying Zeng1, Lijie Tan2, Yingyong Hou1,3, Chen Xu1.
Abstract
We undertook a study of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in a large and relatively homogeneous group of patients with completely resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of 235 ESCC tumours were evaluated for density of TILs in intratumoural (iTIL) and stromal compartments (sTIL). Foxp3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells in tumoural and stromal areas were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Of the 235 tumours, high sTIL (>10%), and iTIL (>10%) were observed in 101 (43.0%) and 98 (41.7%), respectively. The median follow-up period was 36.0 months (95% CI 29.929-42.071). Univariate analysis revealed that sTIL (>10%), iTIL (>20%), vessels involvement, lymph node metastasis, and clinical stage were significantly associated with postoperative outcome. In multivariate analysis, high sTIL (HR: 0.664, P = 0.019 for Disease free survival; HR: 0.608, P = 0.005 for Overall survival) was identified as independent better prognostic factor. Further analysis, sTIL was identified as independently prognostic factor in Stage III-IVa disease, which was not found in Stage I-II disease. Our study demonstrated that sTIL was associated with better ESCC patients' survival, especially in Stage III-IVa disease. Assessment of sTIL could be useful to discriminate biological behavior for ESCC patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28322245 PMCID: PMC5359661 DOI: 10.1038/srep44823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinicopathological factors and association with TILs in ESCC.
| No. | sTIL (>10%) | iTIL (>10%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | Low | High | ||||
| Sex | 0.634 | 0.761 | |||||
| Female | 38 | 23 | 15 | 23 | 15 | ||
| Male | 197 | 111 | 86 | 114 | 83 | ||
| Age | 0.472 | 0.904 | |||||
| <60 | 97 | 58 | 39 | 57 | 40 | ||
| ≥60 | 139 | 77 | 62 | 80 | 58 | ||
| Differentiation | 0.377 | 0.023 | |||||
| well | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||
| moderate | 133 | 71 | 62 | 87 | 46 | ||
| poor | 98 | 60 | 38 | 47 | 51 | ||
| Vessel invasion | 0.798 | 0.545 | |||||
| No | 189 | 107 | 82 | 112 | 77 | ||
| Yes | 46 | 27 | 19 | 25 | 21 | ||
| Nerve invasion | 0.498 | 0.518 | |||||
| No | 166 | 97 | 69 | 99 | 67 | ||
| Yes | 69 | 37 | 32 | 38 | 31 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.475 | 0.383 | |||||
| No | 111 | 66 | 45 | 68 | 43 | ||
| Yes | 124 | 68 | 56 | 69 | 55 | ||
| Site | 0.026 | 0.210 | |||||
| Upper | 12 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 | ||
| Middle | 112 | 73 | 39 | 67 | 45 | ||
| Lower | 102 | 52 | 50 | 59 | 43 | ||
| Stage | 0.699 | 0.646 | |||||
| I–II | 136 | 79 | 57 | 81 | 55 | ||
| III–IVa | 99 | 55 | 44 | 56 | 43 | ||
| Smoking | 0.624 | 0.570 | |||||
| No | 134 | 78 | 56 | 80 | 54 | ||
| Yes | 100 | 55 | 45 | 56 | 44 | ||
sTIL, stromal infiltrating lymphocytes; iTIL, intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes.
Figure 1Representative views of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and CD8 expression in ESCC.
Examples of low sTIL (A) and high sTIL (B) in stromal compartments (magnification 10×), low iTIL (C) and high iTIL (D) in intraepithelial compartments (magnification 40×), CD8+ low sTIL (E) and CD8+ high sTIL (F) in stromal compartments (magnification 10×), CD8+ low iTIL (G) and CD8+ high iTIL (H) in intraepithelial compartments (magnification 40×). White and black arrows indicate tumoural and stromal area respectively.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of patient and tumour factors with DFS and OS.
| P value | DFS | P value | OS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| sTIL (>10%) | 0.083 | 0.743 (0.531–1.040) | 0.037 | 0.697 (0.496–0.979) |
| iTIL (>10%) | 0.508 | 1.119 (0.802–1.561) | 0.616 | 1.090 (0.777–1.530) |
| iTIL (>20%) | 0.050 | 0.508 (0.259–0.999) | 0.042 | 0.477 (0.234–0.974) |
| sCD4 (>10%) | 0.741 | 0.897 (0.472–1.707) | 0.490 | 0.788 (0.401–1.549) |
| sCD8 (>10%) | 0.791 | 0.953 (0.667–1.361) | 0.569 | 0.900 (0.626–1.294) |
| iCD8 (>10%) | 0.706 | 0.929 (0.634–1.361) | 0.585 | 0.896 (0.603–1.330) |
| sFoxp3 (>10%) | 0.641 | 0.717 (0.177–2.900) | 0.604 | 1.447 (0.358–5.854) |
| iFoxp3 (>10%) | 0.478 | 0.603 (0.149–2.437) | 0.239 | 0.307 (0.043–2.194) |
| Sex | 0.991 | 0.999 (0.799–1.249) | 0.901 | 1.015 (0.808–1.274) |
| Age | 0.927 | 0.985 (0.705–1.375) | 0.967 | 0.993 (0.709–1.390) |
| Grade | 0.106 | 1.300 (0.946–1.788) | 0.142 | 1.273 (0.922–1.757) |
| Vessel invasion | 0.002 | 1.793 (1.235–2.605) | <0.001 | 1.996 (1.371–2.906) |
| Nerve invasion | 0.401 | 1.164 (0.817–1.659) | 0.226 | 1.248 (0.872–1.785) |
| Lymph node metastasis | <0.001 | 3.128 (2.178–4.494) | <0.001 | 3.476 (2.404–5.026) |
| Stage | <0.001 | 3.274 (2.330–4.600) | <0.001 | 3.580 (2.536–5.053) |
| Site | 0.042 | 0.758 (0.580–0.990) | 0.066 | 0.775 (0.590–1.017) |
| Smoking | 0.369 | 1.164 (0.836–1.619) | 0.178 | 1.257 (0.901–1.754) |
| sTIL (>10%) | 0.019 | 0.664 (0.473–0.934) | 0.005 | 0.608 (0.431–0.857) |
| iTIL (>20%) | 0.095 | 0.561 (0.284–1.106) | 0.087 | 0.534 (0.260–1.095) |
| Vessel invovlement | 0.506 | 1.142 (0.773–1.687) | 0.327 | 1.217 (0.822–1.803) |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.010 | 1.950 (1.169–3.252) | 0.004 | 2.118 (1.265–3.545) |
| Stage | 0.004 | 2.040 (1.256–3.312) | 0.002 | 2.119 (1.303–3.446) |
DFS, disease free survival. OS, disease specific overall survival. HR, hazard ratio. CI, confidence interval. sTIL, stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iTIL, intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD4, CD4+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD8, CD8+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iCD8, CD8+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sFoxp3, Foxp3+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iFoxp3, Foxp3+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier curves of DFS and OS revealing prognostic significance of TILs in ESCC.
Among 235 patients, a significantly better prognosis was observed in patients with high sTIL (>10%) (P = 0.076 and 0.033) (A and B). In patients with Stage I-II ESCC, sTIL (>10%) was not associated with DFS (P = 0.307) and OS (P = 0.182) (C and D). In patients with Stage III-IVa disease, sTIL (>10%) was associated with improved DFS (P = 0.023) and OS (P = 0.005) (E and F).
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of patient and tumour factors with DFS and OS in Stage III-IVa patients.
| P value | DFS | P value | OS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| sTIL (>10%) | 0.031 | 0.615 (0.395–0.957) | 0.007 | 0.544 (0.349–0.850) |
| iTIL (>10%) | 0.620 | 0.895 (0.577–1.389) | 0.557 | 0.875 (0.561–1.366) |
| iTIL (>20%) | 0.046 | 0.309 (0.097–0.980) | 0.061 | 0.331 (0.104–1.052) |
| sCD4 (>10%) | 0.521 | 0.787 (0.379–1.635) | 0.399 | 0.730 (0.351–1.518) |
| sCD8 (>10%) | 0.078 | 0.654 (0.408–1.048) | 0.036 | 0.599 (0.371–0.968) |
| iCD8 (>10%) | 0.329 | 0.780 (0.474–1.284) | 0.314 | 0.767 (0.458–1.285) |
| sFoxp3 (>10%) | 0.182 | 0.260 (0.036–1.878) | 0.160 | 0.241 (0.033–1.749) |
| Sex | 0.336 | 0.710 (0.354–1.425) | 0.449 | 0.868 (0.600–1.254) |
| Age | 0.409 | 1.202 (0.777–1.859) | 0.340 | 1.238 (0.799–1.919) |
| Grade | 0.922 | 0.980 (0.658–1.461) | 0.804 | 0.950 (0.633–1.426) |
| Vessel invasion | 0.596 | 1.128 (0.723–1.760) | 0.366 | 1.230 (0.786–1.925) |
| Nerve invasion | 0.322 | 1.249 (0.804–1.939) | 0.245 | 1.300 (0.836–2.021) |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.101 | 0.521 (0.239–1.137) | 0.208 | 0.606 (0.278–1.321) |
| Site | 0.011 | 0.620 (0.429–0.896) | 0.013 | 0.622 (0.427–0.905) |
| Smoking | 0.295 | 0.792 (0.513–1.224) | 0.296 | 0.791 (0.510–1.228) |
| sTIL (>10%) | 0.081 | 0.671 (0.428–1.051) | 0.032 | 0.535 (0.303–0.947) |
| iTIL (>20%) | 0.056 | 0.322 (0.101–1.028) | 0.071 | 0.341 (0.106–1.095) |
| sCD8 (>10%) | 0.785 | 1.091 (0.584–2.040) | ||
| Site | 0.038 | 0.032 | ||
| Middle | 0.233 | 0.557 (0.213–1.457) | 0.144 | 0.479 (0.178–1.285) |
| Lower | 0.036 | 0.359 (0.138–0.934) | 0.022 | 0.311 (0.114–0.848) |
DFS, disease free survival. OS, disease specific overall survival. HR, hazard ratio. CI, confidence interval. sTIL, stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iTIL, intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD4, CD4+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD8, CD8+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iCD8, CD8+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sFoxp3, Foxp3+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. iFoxp3, Foxp3+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of patient and tumour factors with DFS and OS in Stage I-II patients.
| P value | DFS | P value | OS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| sTIL (>10%) | 0.315 | 0.766 (0.455–1.289) | 0.189 | 0.700 (0.412–1.191) |
| iTIL (>10%) | 0.379 | 1.258 (0.754–2.097) | 0.488 | 1.225 (0.726–2.067) |
| iTIL (>20%) | 0.624 | 0.810 (0.348–1.883) | 0.460 | 0.707 (0.282–1.772) |
| sCD4 (>10%) | 0.400 | 0.546 (0.133–2.235) | 0.192 | 0.268 (0.037–1.938) |
| sCD8 (>10%) | 0.554 | 1.180 (0.683–2.037) | 0.730 | 1.103 (0.631–1.929) |
| iCD8 (>10%) | 0.898 | 0.962 (0.529–1.750) | 0.817 | 0.930 (0.501–1.724) |
| sFoxp3 (>10%) | 0.582 | 1.742 (0.241–12.590) | 0.604 | 1.689 (0.233–12.220) |
| iFoxp3 (>10%) | 0.981 | 1.018 (0.248–4.173) | 0.536 | 0.535 (0.074–3.871) |
| Sex | 0.466 | 0.895 (0.663–1.207) | 0.369 | 0.871 (0.645–1.177) |
| Age | 0.729 | 1.099 (0.646–1.868) | 0.592 | 1.160 (0.674–1.994) |
| Grade | 0.064 | 1.600 (0.974–2.631) | 0.124 | 1.487 (0.897–2.465) |
| Vessel invasion | 0.681 | 1.194 (0.513–2.777) | 0.544 | 1.300 (0.558–3.031) |
| Nerve invasion | 0.038 | 0.435 (0.197–0.956) | 0.074 | 0.487 (0.221–1.074) |
| Lymph node metastasis | <0.001 | 2.689 (1.600–4.518) | <0.001 | 2.970 (1.757–5.021) |
| Site | 0.034 | 0.646 (0.431–0.968) | 0.049 | 0.660 (0.436–0.998) |
| Smoking | 0.617 | 1.142 (0.678–1.922) | 0.437 | 1.232 (0.728–2.085) |
| Nerve involvement | 0.168 | 0.568 (0.255–1.268) | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.001 | 2.382 (1.403–4.044) | <0.001 | 2.856 (1.685–4.839) |
| Site | 0.010 | 0.010 | ||
| Middle | 0.274 | 1.927 (0.595–6.237) | 0.250 | 1.997 (0.615–6.484) |
| Lower | 0.722 | 0.799 (0.232–2.749) | 0.749 | 0.816 (0.236–2.823) |
DFS, disease free survival. OS, disease specific overall survival. HR, hazard ratio. CI, confidence interval. sTIL, stromal infiltrating lymphocytes; iTIL, intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD4, CD4+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes. sCD8, CD8+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes; iCD8, CD8+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. sFoxp3, Foxp3+ stromal infiltrating lymphocytes; iFoxp3, Foxp3+ intratumoural infiltrating lymphocytes.