Literature DB >> 28321534

Factors influencing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy outcome.

Kazuhiro Nomura1,2, Kazuya Arakawa3,4, Mitsuru Sugawara4, Hiroshi Hidaka3, Jun Suzuki3,4, Yukio Katori3.   

Abstract

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a widely accepted treatment option for epiphora and dacryocystitis. To elucidate the cause of treatment failure after surgery, we analyzed patients' characteristics and perioperative background in association with poor outcome. We analyzed 165 patients with 213 sides who had endoscopic DCR. The influence of age, duration of symptoms, occlusion site and stent insertion were analyzed. Symptoms were completely cured in 85.0% (181/213) sides. Higher age (≥65 years) and proximal obstruction were associated with a poor prognosis while stent insertion and duration of symptoms were not. Higher age and proximal obstruction site were associated with a poor prognosis. Patients with a long history can be treated as per normal. The stent is not necessarily inserted in cases where the obstruction occurs distal to the lacrimal sac.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dacryocystitis; Dacryocystorhinostomy; Endoscope; Epiphora; Outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28321534     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4541-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  17 in total

1.  Bicanalicular Silicone Stents in Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Tessa Fayers; Peter J Dolman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ali S Al-Qahtani
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.467

3.  Evaluation of symptoms and QOL with calcium alginate versus chitin-coated gauze for middle meatus packing after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Tetsushi Okushi; Mamoru Yoshikawa; Nobuyoshi Otori; Yoshinori Matsuwaki; Daiya Asaka; Tsugihisa Nakayama; Tadamitsu Morimoto; Hiroshi Moriyama
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 1.863

Review 4.  The benefit of silicone stents in primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Sarode; D A Bari; A C Cain; M I Syed; A T Williams
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  M McDonogh; J H Meiring
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 6.  Mucosal and lacrimal flaps for endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Green; R Gohil; P Ross
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Kelvin K L Chong; Frank H P Lai; Mary Ho; Abbie Luk; Ben W Wong; Alvin Young
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study.

Authors:  F Longari; P Dehgani Mobaraki; A L Ricci; R Lapenna; C Cagini; G Ricci
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults.

Authors:  Samuel C Leong; Caroline J Macewen; Paul S White
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.467

10.  The surgical outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy according to the obstruction levels of lacrimal drainage system.

Authors:  Ji Chul Choi; Hong-Ryul Jin; Young Eun Moon; Min-Sang Kim; Jae Kwang Oh; Hyun Ah Kim; Mi-Young Choi; Woo Sub Shim
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.372

View more
  2 in total

1.  Multifactorial assessment is essential to maximize the likelihood of good outcomes after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Reply to commentary to: factors influencing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy outcome.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Nomura; Kazuya Arakawa; Mitsuru Sugawara; Hiroshi Hidaka; Jun Suzuki; Yukio Katori
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.