Ali S Al-Qahtani1. 1. Department of Ear, Nose, Throat and Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. dralient@yahoo.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is an effective surgical procedure to treat saccal and postsaccal stenosis or nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The use of silicone tube after endoscopic DCR is still controversial. A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the success rate between the use of silicone stent and no use of silicone stent in endoscopic DCR. METHODS: A prospective randomized study was conducted at Aseer Central Hospital and Abha Private Hospital, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, on all patients undergoing endoscopic DCR between July 1, 2006 and 30 June 30, 2010. Patients were allocated randomly for endoscopic DCR with or without stent. The data collection included age, sex, diagnosis, method, and duration of surgery. Patients were followed up postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, and then every 3 months for 1 year. RESULTS: During the period of the study a total of 173 cases of postsaccal stenosis underwent endoscopic DCR (67 male and 106 female subjects). The mean age was 51.8 years (range, 18-72 years). A stent was used in 92 patients (53.2%) and not used in 81 patients (46.8%). With silicone tubing the success rate was 96%, and without silicone tubing it was 91%, an overall success rate of 94%. The odds ratio of failure without a silicone tube was 3.25 but confidence interval was from 0.84 to 12.60 and the difference between these two groups was statistically not significant (p = 0.117). CONCLUSION: In this study, there was no statistically significant advantage of using endoscopic DCR with stent over the endoscopic DCR without stent.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is an effective surgical procedure to treat saccal and postsaccal stenosis or nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The use of silicone tube after endoscopic DCR is still controversial. A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the success rate between the use of silicone stent and no use of silicone stent in endoscopic DCR. METHODS: A prospective randomized study was conducted at Aseer Central Hospital and Abha Private Hospital, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, on all patients undergoing endoscopic DCR between July 1, 2006 and 30 June 30, 2010. Patients were allocated randomly for endoscopic DCR with or without stent. The data collection included age, sex, diagnosis, method, and duration of surgery. Patients were followed up postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, and then every 3 months for 1 year. RESULTS: During the period of the study a total of 173 cases of postsaccal stenosis underwent endoscopic DCR (67 male and 106 female subjects). The mean age was 51.8 years (range, 18-72 years). A stent was used in 92 patients (53.2%) and not used in 81 patients (46.8%). With silicone tubing the success rate was 96%, and without silicone tubing it was 91%, an overall success rate of 94%. The odds ratio of failure without a silicone tube was 3.25 but confidence interval was from 0.84 to 12.60 and the difference between these two groups was statistically not significant (p = 0.117). CONCLUSION: In this study, there was no statistically significant advantage of using endoscopic DCR with stent over the endoscopic DCR without stent.
Authors: Sara Abu-Ghanem; Ran Ben-Cnaan; Igal Leibovitch; Gilad Horowitz; Gadi Fishman; Dan M Fliss; Avraham Abergel Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: F Longari; P Dehgani Mobaraki; A L Ricci; R Lapenna; C Cagini; G Ricci Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: E Emanuelli; F Pagella; G Dané; A Pusateri; G Giourgos; P Carena; E Antoniazzi; P Verdecchia; E Matti Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.124