Literature DB >> 28320635

Safety and efficacy of multipotent adult progenitor cells in acute ischaemic stroke (MASTERS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

David C Hess1, Lawrence R Wechsler2, Wayne M Clark3, Sean I Savitz4, Gary A Ford5, David Chiu6, Dileep R Yavagal7, Ken Uchino8, David S Liebeskind9, Alexander P Auchus10, Souvik Sen11, Cathy A Sila12, Jeffrey D Vest13, Robert W Mays14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multipotent adult progenitor cells are a bone marrow-derived, allogeneic, cell therapy product that modulates the immune system, and represents a promising therapy for acute stroke. We aimed to identify the highest, well-tolerated, and safest single dose of multipotent adult progenitor cells, and if they were efficacious as a treatment for stroke recovery.
METHODS: We did a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial of intravenous multipotent adult progenitor cells in 33 centres in the UK and the USA. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence and interactive voice and web response system to assign patients aged 18-83 years with moderately severe acute ischaemic stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 8-20 to treatment with intravenous multipotent adult progenitor cells (400 million or 1200 million cells) or placebo between 24 h and 48 h after symptom onset. Patients were ineligible if there was a change in NIHSS of four or more points during at least a 6 h period between screening and randomisation, had brainstem or lacunar infarct, a substantial comorbid disease, an inability to undergo an MRI scan, or had a history of splenectomy. In group 1, patients were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive 400 million cells or placebo and assessed for safety through 7 days. In group 2, patients were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive 1200 million cells or placebo and assessed for safety through the first 7 days. In group 3, patients were enrolled, randomly assigned, and stratified by baseline NIHSS score to receive 1200 million cells or placebo in a 1:1 ratio within 24-48 h. Patients, investigators, and clinicians were masked to treatment assignment. The primary safety outcome was dose-limiting toxicity effects. The primary efficacy endpoint was global stroke recovery, which combines dichotomised results from the modified Rankin scale, change in NIHSS score from baseline, and Barthel index at day 90. Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT) including all patients in groups 2 and 3 who received the investigational agent or placebo. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01436487.
FINDINGS: The study was done between Oct 24, 2011, and Dec 7, 2015. After safety assessments in eight patients in group 1, 129 patients were randomly assigned (67 to receive multipotent adult progenitor cells and 62 to receive placebo) in groups 2 and 3 (1200 million cells). The ITT populations consisted of 65 patients who received multipotent adult progenitor cells and 61 patients who received placebo. There were no dose-limiting toxicity events in either group. There were no infusional or allergic reactions and no difference in treatment-emergent adverse events between the groups (64 [99%] of 65 patients in the multipotent adult progenitor cell group vs 59 [97%] of 61 in the placebo group). There was no difference between the multipotent adult progenitor cell group and placebo groups in global stroke recovery at day 90 (odds ratio 1·08 [95% CI 0·55-2·09], p=0·83).
INTERPRETATION: Administration of multipotent adult progenitor cells was safe and well tolerated in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Although no significant improvement was observed at 90 days in neurological outcomes with multipotent adult progenitor cells treatment, further clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of the intervention in an earlier time window after stroke (<36 h) are planned. FUNDING: Athersys Inc.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28320635     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30046-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  108 in total

Review 1.  Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Clinical Challenges and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Jacques Galipeau; Luc Sensébé
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 2.  New Directions in Treatments Targeting Stroke Recovery.

Authors:  David J Lin; Seth P Finklestein; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Next-generation stem cells - ushering in a new era of cell-based therapies.

Authors:  Erin A Kimbrel; Robert Lanza
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  Cell Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: How to Turn a Promising Preclinical Research into a Successful Clinical Story.

Authors:  Gabrielle Mangin; Nathalie Kubis
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 5.  Stem cells technology: a powerful tool behind new brain treatments.

Authors:  Lucienne N Duru; Zhenzhen Quan; Talal Jamil Qazi; Hong Qing
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 6.  Promoting Brain Repair and Regeneration After Stroke: a Plea for Cell-Based Therapies.

Authors:  Ania Dabrowski; Thomas J Robinson; Ryan J Felling
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Translating concepts of neural repair after stroke: Structural and functional targets for recovery.

Authors:  Robert W Regenhardt; Hajime Takase; Eng H Lo; David J Lin
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 8.  Promoting neuroregeneration after perinatal arterial ischemic stroke: neurotrophic factors and mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Nienke Wagenaar; Caroline G M de Theije; Linda S de Vries; Floris Groenendaal; Manon J N L Benders; Cora H A Nijboer
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 9.  Stem Cell-Based Immunomodulation After Stroke: Effects on Brain Repair Processes.

Authors:  Marieke C S Boshuizen; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Giorgio Battista Boncoraglio; Michela Ranieri; Anna Bersano; Eugenio A Parati; Cinzia Del Giovane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.