Literature DB >> 26863502

Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks: Does Varying Local Anesthetic Delivery Method (Automatic Repeated Bolus Doses Versus Continuous Basal Infusion) Influence Cutaneous Analgesia and Quadriceps Femoris Strength? A Randomized, Double-Masked, Controlled, Split-Body Volunteer Study.

Amanda M Monahan1, Jacklynn F Sztain, Bahareh Khatibi, Timothy J Furnish, Pia Jæger, Daniel I Sessler, Edward J Mascha, Jing You, Cindy H Wen, Ken A Nakanote, Brian M Ilfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains unknown whether continuous or scheduled intermittent bolus local anesthetic administration is preferable for adductor canal perineural catheters. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that scheduled bolus administration is superior or noninferior to a continuous infusion on cutaneous knee sensation in volunteers.
METHODS: Bilateral adductor canal catheters were inserted in 24 volunteers followed by ropivacaine 0.2% administration for 8 hours. One limb of each subject was assigned randomly to a continuous infusion (8 mL/h) or automated hourly boluses (8 mL/bolus), with the alternate treatment in the contralateral limb. The primary end point was the tolerance to electrical current applied through cutaneous electrodes in the distribution of the anterior branch of the medial femoral cutaneous nerve after 8 hours (noninferiority delta: -10 mA). Secondary end points included tolerance of electrical current and quadriceps femoris maximum voluntary isometric contraction strength at baseline, hourly for 14 hours, and again after 22 hours.
RESULTS: The 2 administration techniques provided equivalent cutaneous analgesia at 8 hours because noninferiority was found in both directions, with estimated difference on tolerance to cutaneous current of -0.6 mA (95% confidence interval, -5.4 to 4.3). Equivalence also was found on all but 2 secondary time points.
CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found to support the hypothesis that changing the local anesthetic administration technique (continuous basal versus hourly bolus) when using an adductor canal perineural catheter at 8 mL/h decreases cutaneous sensation in the distribution of the anterior branch of the medial femoral cutaneous nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26863502     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

1.  Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane Nerve Blocks: Does Varying Local Anesthetic Delivery Method-Automatic Repeated Bolus Versus Continuous Basal Infusion-Influence the Extent of Sensation to Cold?: A Randomized, Triple-Masked, Crossover Study in Volunteers.

Authors:  Bahareh Khatibi; Engy T Said; Jacklynn F Sztain; Amanda M Monahan; Rodney A Gabriel; Timothy J Furnish; Johnathan T Tran; Michael C Donohue; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Adductor canal blocks for postoperative pain treatment in adults undergoing knee surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Schnabel; Sylvia U Reichl; Stephanie Weibel; Peter K Zahn; Peter Kranke; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Christine H Meyer-Frießem
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-26

3.  Early Postoperative Pain Control and Inflammation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Comparison of Continuous Adductor Canal Block versus Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block Combined with Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Yang; Jun Dong; Wei Xiong; Fusen Huang
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Comparison of two different volumes of 0.5%, ropivacaine used in ultrasound-guided adductor canal block after knee arthroplasty: A randomized, blinded, controlled noninferiority trial.

Authors:  Nishith Govil; Mukesh Tripathi; Tarun Goyal; Bharat B Bhardwaj; Vamshi Krishna; Arghya K Choudhury
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-09-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.