The stretching frequency, ν(Cu-O), of the [CuOH]2+ core in the complexes LCuOH (L = N,N'-bis(2,6-diisopropyl-4-R-phenyl)pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide, R = H or NO2, or N,N'-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-1-methylpiperidine-2,6-dicarboxamide) was determined to be ∼630 cm-1 by resonance Raman spectroscopy and verified by isotopic labeling. In efforts to use Badger's rule to estimate the bond distance corresponding to ν(Cu-O), a modified version of the rule was developed through use of stretching frequencies normalized by dividing by the appropriate reduced masses. The modified version was found to yield excellent fits of normalized frequencies to bond distances for >250 data points from theory and experiment for a variety of M-X and X-X bond distances in the range ∼1.1-2.2 Å (root mean squared errors for the predicted bond distances of 0.03 Å). Using the resulting general equation, the Cu-O bond distance was predicted to be ∼1.80 Å for the reactive [CuOH]2+ core. Limitations of the equation and its use in predictions of distances in a variety of moieties for which structural information is not available were explored.
The stretching frequency, ν(Cu-O), of the [n class="Chemical">CuOH]2+ core in the complexes LCuOH (L = N,N'-bis(2,6-diisopropyl-4-R-phenyl)pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide, R = H or NO2, or N,N'-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-1-methylpiperidine-2,6-dicarboxamide) was determined to be ∼630 cm-1 by resonance Raman spectroscopy and verified by isotopic labeling. In efforts to use Badger's rule to estimate the bond distance corresponding to ν(Cu-O), a modified version of the rule was developed through use of stretching frequencies normalized by dividing by the appropriate reduced masses. The modified version was found to yield excellent fits of normalized frequencies to bond distances for >250 data points from theory and experiment for a variety of M-X and X-X bond distances in the range ∼1.1-2.2 Å (root mean squared errors for the predicted bond distances of 0.03 Å). Using the resulting general equation, the Cu-O bond distance was predicted to be ∼1.80 Å for the reactive [CuOH]2+ core. Limitations of the equation and its use in predictions of distances in a variety of moieties for which structural information is not available were explored.
Authors: Debanjan Dhar; Gereon M Yee; Andrew D Spaeth; David W Boyce; Hongtu Zhang; Büsra Dereli; Christopher J Cramer; William B Tolman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Edward I Solomon; David E Heppner; Esther M Johnston; Jake W Ginsbach; Jordi Cirera; Munzarin Qayyum; Matthew T Kieber-Emmons; Christian H Kjaergaard; Ryan G Hadt; Li Tian Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Christopher J Cramer; William B Tolman; Klaus H Theopold; Arnold L Rheingold Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-03-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David A Quist; Melanie A Ehudin; Andrew W Schaefer; Gregory L Schneider; Edward I Solomon; Kenneth D Karlin Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jesse B Gordon; Avery C Vilbert; Maxime A Siegler; Kyle M Lancaster; Pierre Moënne-Loccoz; David P Goldberg Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jan Paulo T Zaragoza; Timothy H Yosca; Maxime A Siegler; Pierre Moënne-Loccoz; Michael T Green; David P Goldberg Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Benjamin D Neisen; Nicole L Gagnon; Debanjan Dhar; Andrew D Spaeth; William B Tolman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Courtney E Elwell; Mukunda Mandal; Caitlin J Bouchey; Lawrence Que; Christopher J Cramer; William B Tolman Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Suzanne M Adam; Gayan B Wijeratne; Patrick J Rogler; Daniel E Diaz; David A Quist; Jeffrey J Liu; Kenneth D Karlin Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: V Mahesh Krishnan; Dimitar Y Shopov; Caitlin J Bouchey; Wilson D Bailey; Riffat Parveen; Bess Vlaisavljevich; William B Tolman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 15.419