Literature DB >> 31577145

Low Reorganization Energy for Electron Self-Exchange by a Formally Copper(III,II) Redox Couple.

Timothy J Zerk1, Caroline T Saouma2, James M Mayer3, William B Tolman1.   

Abstract

The rate constant for electron self-exchange (k11) between LCuOH and [LCuOH]- (L = bis-2,6-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carboximidopyridine) was determined using the Marcus cross relation. This work involved measurement of the rate of the cross-reaction between [Bu4N][LCuOH] and [Fc][BAr4F] (Fc+ = ferrocenium; BAr4F = tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate)) by stopped-flow methods at -88 °C in CH2Cl2 and measurement of the equilibrium constant for the redox process by UV-vis titrations under the same conditions. A value of k11 = 3 × 104 M-1 s-1 (-88 °C) led to estimation of a value 9 × 106 M-1 s-1 at 25 °C, which is among the highest values known for copper redox couples. Further Marcus analysis enabled determination of a low reorganization energy, λ = 0.95 ± 0.17 eV, attributed to minimal structural variation between the redox partners. In addition, the reaction entropy (ΔS°) associated with the LCuOH/[LCuOH]- self-exchange was determined from the temperature dependence of the redox potentials, and found to be dependent upon ionic strength. Comparisons to other Cu redox systems and potential new applications for the formally CuIII,II system are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31577145      PMCID: PMC7200075          DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0020-1669            Impact factor:   5.165


  36 in total

Review 1.  Reactivity of dioxygen-copper systems.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Lewis; William B Tolman
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Rapid C-H bond activation by a monocopper(III)-hydroxide complex.

Authors:  Patrick J Donoghue; Jacqui Tehranchi; Christopher J Cramer; Ritimukta Sarangi; Edward I Solomon; William B Tolman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Copper active sites in biology.

Authors:  Edward I Solomon; David E Heppner; Esther M Johnston; Jake W Ginsbach; Jordi Cirera; Munzarin Qayyum; Matthew T Kieber-Emmons; Christian H Kjaergaard; Ryan G Hadt; Li Tian
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  NMR study of structure and electron transfer mechanism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa azurin.

Authors:  C M Groeneveld; G W Canters
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Iron and Copper Active Sites in Zeolites and Their Correlation to Metalloenzymes.

Authors:  Benjamin E R Snyder; Max L Bols; Robert A Schoonheydt; Bert F Sels; Edward I Solomon
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 6.  Copper-Oxygen Complexes Revisited: Structures, Spectroscopy, and Reactivity.

Authors:  Courtney E Elwell; Nicole L Gagnon; Benjamin D Neisen; Debanjan Dhar; Andrew D Spaeth; Gereon M Yee; William B Tolman
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  The trivalent copper complex of a conjugated bis-dithiocarbazate Schiff base: stabilization of Cu in three different oxidation states.

Authors:  Mohammad Akbar Ali; Paul V Bernhardt; Mathilde A H Brax; Jason England; Anthony J Farlow; Graeme R Hanson; Lee Len Yeng; Aminul Huq Mirza; Karl Wieghardt
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  Copper Guanidinoquinoline Complexes as Entatic State Models of Electron-Transfer Proteins.

Authors:  Julia Stanek; Nina Sackers; Fabian Fink; Melanie Paul; Laurens Peters; Richard Grunzke; Alexander Hoffmann; Sonja Herres-Pawlis
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 5.236

9.  Mononuclear Cu-O2 complexes: geometries, spectroscopic properties, electronic structures, and reactivity.

Authors:  Christopher J Cramer; William B Tolman
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 22.384

10.  11% efficiency solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with copper(II/I) hole transport materials.

Authors:  Yiming Cao; Yasemin Saygili; Amita Ummadisingu; Joël Teuscher; Jingshan Luo; Norman Pellet; Fabrizio Giordano; Shaik Mohammed Zakeeruddin; Jacques-E Moser; Marina Freitag; Anders Hagfeldt; Michael Grätzel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Dye-sensitized solar cells strike back.

Authors:  Ana Belén Muñoz-García; Iacopo Benesperi; Gerrit Boschloo; Javier J Concepcion; Jared H Delcamp; Elizabeth A Gibson; Gerald J Meyer; Michele Pavone; Henrik Pettersson; Anders Hagfeldt; Marina Freitag
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Structural Characterization of the [CuOR]2+ Core.

Authors:  V Mahesh Krishnan; Dimitar Y Shopov; Caitlin J Bouchey; Wilson D Bailey; Riffat Parveen; Bess Vlaisavljevich; William B Tolman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Sulfur-Containing Analogues of the Reactive [CuOH]2+ Core.

Authors:  Wen Wu; Jacqui Tehranchi De Hont; Riffat Parveen; Bess Vlaisavljevich; William B Tolman
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Encapsulation of tricopper cluster in a synthetic cryptand enables facile redox processes from CuICuICuI to CuIICuIICuII states.

Authors:  Weiyao Zhang; Curtis E Moore; Shiyu Zhang
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 9.825

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.