| Literature DB >> 28317782 |
I Rodriguez-Ramiro1, C A Brearley2, S F A Bruggraber3, A Perfecto4, P Shewry5, S Fairweather-Tait4.
Abstract
Myo-inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6), is the main iron chelator in cereals and bread. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of three commercial baking processes (sourdough, conventional yeast and Chorleywood Bread Making Process (CBP)) on the IP6 content of wholemeal bread, its impact on iron uptake in Caco-2 cells and the predicted bioavailability of iron from these breads with added iron, simulating a mixed-meal. The sourdough process fully degraded IP6 whilst the CBP and conventional processes reduced it by 75% compared with wholemeal flour. The iron released in solution after a simulated digestion was 8-fold higher in sourdough bread than with others but no difference in cellular iron uptake was observed. Additionally, when iron was added to the different breads digestions only sourdough bread elicited a significant ferritin response in Caco-2 cells (4.8-fold compared to the other breads) suggesting that sourdough bread could contribute towards improved iron nutrition. CrownEntities:
Keywords: Caco-2 cells; Iron uptake; Myo-inositol hexakisphosphate; Simulated gastrointestinal digestion; Sourdough bread
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28317782 PMCID: PMC5380216 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.01.130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem ISSN: 0308-8146 Impact factor: 7.514
Amount, yield and iron obtained for each mill fractions from 20 kg of the Hereward wheat grain.
| Mill fraction | Amount (g) | Yield (%) | Cumulative yield (%) | Fe (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Break 1 | 2410 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 8.6 |
| Break 2 | 1567 | 7.8 | 19.9 | 9.0 |
| Break 3 | 384 | 1.9 | 21.8 | 21.3 |
| Reduction 1 | 9343 | 46.7 | 68.5 | 7.8 |
| Reduction 2 | 1302 | 6.5 | 75.0 | 15.3 |
| Reduction 3 | 309 | 1.5 | 76.6 | 23.7 |
| Bran flour | 198 | 1.0 | 77.6 | 63.4 |
| Offal flour | 383 | 1.9 | 79.4 | 68.5 |
| Bran | 1905 | 9.5 | 89.0 | 115.8 |
| Offal | 1729 | 8.6 | 97.6 | 125.3 |
Ingredients (g/kg) employed at the different stages of the three bread making processes.
| Bread process | Ingredients | g/kg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chorleywood | Wholemeal flour | 608.23 | |
| Water | 367.37 | ||
| Ascorbic Acid | 0.0625 | ||
| Salt | 9.0366 | ||
| Yeast | 12.164 | ||
| Bread fat | 3.1280 | ||
| Wholemeal flour | 630.25 | ||
| Stage 1 (day 1) | Water | 365.54 | |
| Yeast | 4.2016 | ||
| Conventional | Wholemeal flour | 435.99 | |
| Water | 241.71 | ||
| Stage 2 (day 2) | Yeasted 16 h sponge | 305.19 | |
| Salt | 8.7199 | ||
| Yeast | 6.2783 | ||
| Bread fat | 2.0927 | ||
| Wholemeal flour | 626.11 | ||
| Water @ 35 °C | 363.14 | ||
| Stage 1 (day 1) | Starter culture Lesaffre (LV1) | 3.5778 | |
| Salt | 7.1556 | ||
| Sourdough | Wholemeal flour | 519.03 | |
| Water | 313.49 | ||
| Stage 2 (day 2) | Sourdough sponge | 155.70 | |
| Salt | 7.9584 | ||
| Yeast | 1.0380 | ||
| Bread fat | 2.7681 | ||
Fig. 1Representative chromatograms (UV 290 nm detection) of the inositol phosphates (IP) of the flour and the different types of bread: (a) Internal standard for different IPs, the arrow denotes IP6, (b) Hereward wholegrain flour, (c) Conventional, (d) CBP and (e) Sourdough bread. (f) Percentage of IP6 in the different bread types relative to the Hereward flour used for bread making. Data represent means ± SEM (n = 4). Means without a common letter differs (P < 0.05).
Endogenous iron, myo-inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6) content and the molar ratio IP6:Fe of the three bread processes.
| Bread type | Endogenous iron mg/100 g (DW) | IP6 g/100 g (DW) | Molar ratio IP6:Fe |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sourdough | 3.2 ± 0.06 | ⩽1 | |
| Conventional | 3.0 ± 0.09 | 0.19 ± 0.06 | 5.36 ± 0.97 |
| Chorleywood | 2.5 ± 0.07 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 6.01 ± 0.35 |
Data represent means ± SEM (n = 3). DW, dry weight; n.d., non detected (<0.005 g IP6/100 g).
Fig. 2Bioaccessible and bioavailable endogenous iron in the different type of bread supplemented with ascorbic acid (AA) in a molar ratio 1:20 (Fe:AA). (a) Bioaccessible iron in the final gastrointestinal digestion. (b) Percentage of the precipitated and bioaccessible iron fractions in the different bread digestion. (c) Ferritin response in Caco-2 cells exposed to the different gastrointestinal bread digestion. Data represent means ± SEM (n = 6–8). Means without a common letter differs (P < 0.05).
Fig. 3Bioaccessible and bioavailable iron in a simulated mixed-diet adding 100 μM ferrous sulphate and ascorbic acid (AA) in a molar ratio 1:20 (Fe:AA) to the bread prior the gastrointestinal digestion. (a) Bioaccessible iron in the final gastrointestinal digestion. (b) Percentage of the precipitated and bioaccessible iron fractions in the different bread digestion. (c) Ferritin response in Caco-2 cells exposed to the different gastrointestinal bread digestion. Data represent means ± SEM (n = 6–8). Means without a common letter differs (P < 0.05).