Literature DB >> 28317122

An anthropomorphic abdominal phantom for deformable image registration accuracy validation in adaptive radiation therapy.

Yuliang Liao1, Linjing Wang2, Xiangdong Xu3, Haibin Chen1, Jiawei Chen1, Guoqian Zhang2, Huaiyu Lei2, Ruihao Wang2, Shuxu Zhang2, Xuejun Gu4, Xin Zhen1, Linghong Zhou1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To design and construct a three-dimensional (3D) anthropomorphic abdominal phantom for geometric accuracy and dose summation accuracy evaluations of deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms for adaptive radiation therapy (ART).
METHOD: Organ molds, including liver, kidney, spleen, stomach, vertebra, and two metastasis tumors, were 3D printed using contours from an ovarian cancer patient. The organ molds were molded with deformable gels made of different mixtures of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and the softener dioctyl terephthalate. Gels with different densities were obtained by a polynomial fitting curve that described the relation between the Hounsfield unit (HU) and PVC-softener blending ratio. The rigid vertebras were constructed by molding of white cement and cellulose pulp. The final abdominal phantom was assembled by arranging all the fabricated organs inside a hollow dummy according to their anatomies, and sealed by deformable gel with averaged HU of muscle and fat. Fiducial landmarks were embedded inside the phantom for spatial accuracy and dose accumulation accuracy studies. Two channels were excavated to facilitate ionization chamber insertion for dosimetric measurements. Phantom properties such as deformable gel elasticity and HU stability were studied. The dosimetric measurement accuracy in the phantom was performed, and the DIR accuracies of three DIR algorithms available in the open source DIR toolkit-DIRART were also validated.
RESULTS: The constructed deformable gel showed elastic behavior and was stable in HU values over times, proving to be a practical material for the deformable phantom. The constructed abdominal phantom consisted of realistic anatomies in terms of both anatomical shapes and densities when compared with its reference patient. The dosimetric measurements showed a good agreement with the calculated doses from the treatment planning system. Fiducial-based accuracy analysis conducted on the constructed phantom demonstrated the feasibility of applying the phantom for organ-wise DIR accuracy assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: We have designed and constructed an anthropomorphic abdominal deformable phantom with satisfactory elastic property, realistic organ density, and anatomy. This physical phantom can be used for routine validations of DIR geometric accuracy and dose accumulation accuracy in ART.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deformable gel; deformable image registration validation; phantom construction; three-dimensional deformable phantom

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28317122     DOI: 10.1002/mp.12229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Influence of tube potential on quantitative coronary plaque analyses by low radiation dose computed tomography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Chunhong Wang; Yuliang Liao; Haibin Chen; Xin Zhen; Jianhong Li; Yikai Xu; Linghong Zhou
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  An overview on 3D printing for abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Pietrabissa; Stefania Marconi; Erika Negrello; Valeria Mauri; Andrea Peri; Luigi Pugliese; Enrico Maria Marone; Ferdinando Auricchio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  3D-printed breast phantom for multi-purpose and multi-modality imaging.

Authors:  Yaoyao He; Yulin Liu; Brandon A Dyer; John M Boone; Shanshan Liu; Tiao Chen; Fenglian Zheng; Ye Zhu; Yong Sun; Yi Rong; Jianfeng Qiu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-01

4.  3D dosimetric validation of ultrasound-guided radiotherapy with a dynamically deformable abdominal phantom.

Authors:  Charles K Matrosic; Wesley Culberson; Andrew Shepard; Sydney Jupitz; Bryan Bednarz
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy - the need for guidance and QA tools.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Adeyemi Akintonde; Jamie McClelland; Richard Speight; Catharine H Clark
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Rigid and Deformable Image Registration for Radiation Therapy: A Self-Study Evaluation Guide for NRG Oncology Clinical Trial Participation.

Authors:  Yi Rong; Mihaela Rosu-Bubulac; Stanley H Benedict; Yunfeng Cui; Russell Ruo; Tanner Connell; Rojano Kashani; Kujtim Latifi; Quan Chen; Huaizhi Geng; Jason Sohn; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-03-02

7.  A Systematic Review on 3D-Printed Imaging and Dosimetry Phantoms in Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Rance Tino; Adam Yeo; Martin Leary; Milan Brandt; Tomas Kron
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-01

8.  Cone Beam CT-Based Daily Adaptive Planning or Defined-Filling Protocol for Neoadjuvant Gastric Cancer Radiation Therapy: A Comparison.

Authors:  Gustavo R Sarria; Hanna Schmitt; Lennart Jahnke; Daniel Bürgy; Frederik Wenz; Kerstin Siebenlist; Frank A Giordano; Anika Jahnke; Judit Boda-Heggemann
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-13

Review 9.  Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) Strategies and Technical Considerations: A State of the ART Review From NRG Oncology.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Percy Lee; Adam D Yock; Jeffrey R Olsen; Minsong Cao; Farzan Siddiqui; William Parker; Anthony Doemer; Yi Rong; Amar U Kishan; Stanley H Benedict; X Allen Li; Beth A Erickson; Jason W Sohn; Ying Xiao; Evan Wuthrick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 7.038

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.