| Literature DB >> 28316073 |
Mengye Li1, Sandeep S Hothi1, Samantha C Salvage1,2, Kamalan Jeevaratnam3, Andrew A Grace2, Christopher L-H Huang1,2.
Abstract
Recent papers have attributed arrhythmic substrate in murine RyR2-P2328S hearts to reduced action potential (AP) conduction velocities (CV), reflecting acute functional inhibition and/or reduced expression of sodium channels. We explored for acute effects of direct exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac)-mediated ryanodine receptor-2 (RyR2) activation on arrhythmic substrate and CV. Monophasic action potential (MAP) recordings demonstrated that initial steady (8 Hz) extrinsic pacing elicited ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 0 of 18 Langendorff-perfused wild-type mouse ventricles before pharmacological intervention. The Epac activator 8-CPT (8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-2'-O-methyladenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate) (VT in 1 of 7 hearts), and the RyR2 blocker dantrolene, either alone (0 of 11) or with 8-CPT (0 of 9) did not then increase VT incidence (P>.05). Both progressively increased pacing rates and programmed extrasystolic (S2) stimuli similarly produced no VT in untreated hearts (n=20 and n=9 respectively). 8-CPT challenge then increased VT incidences (5 of 7 and 4 of 8 hearts respectively; P<.05). However, dantrolene, whether alone (0 of 10 and 1 of 13) or combined with 8-CPT (0 of 10 and 0 of 13) did not increase VT incidence relative to those observed in untreated hearts (P>.05). 8-CPT but not dantrolene, whether alone or combined with 8-CPT, correspondingly increased AP latencies (1.14±0.04 (n=7), 1.04±0.03 (n=10), 1.09±0.05 (n=8) relative to respective control values). In contrast, AP durations, conditions for 2:1 conduction block and ventricular effective refractory periods remained unchanged throughout. We thus demonstrate for the first time that acute RyR2 activation reversibly induces VT in specific association with reduced CV.Entities:
Keywords: Ca2+ homeostasis; Epac; cardiac arrhythmias; conduction velocity; ryanodine receptors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28316073 PMCID: PMC5488224 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.12751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol ISSN: 0305-1870 Impact factor: 2.557
Figure 1Steady (8 Hz) pacing simulating resting heart rate. (A) 8 Hz steady state protocol used to pace the heart at resting heart rate. Vertical markers below each monophasic action potential (MAP) trace marks the timing of successive pacing stimuli. (B) Typical MAP traces recorded from the left ventricle of wild‐type (WT) mice hearts perfused with either (i) control solution alone, (ii) 8‐CPT, (iii) dantrolene, or (iv) dantrolene with 8‐CPT
Figure 2Hearts paced with the incremental pacing protocol to investigate effect of progressively increasing steady HRs. (A) An incremental pacing protocol was applied, with each stimulus train composed of 100 stimulations, starting at a basic cycle length (BCL) of 154 ms. The BCL was decreased by 5 ms for each new set of stimulus trains. Each run of the incremental pacing protocol consisted of multiple repeats of stimulus trains. The BCL decreased until it was shorter than the ventricular refractory period. This appeared as the point of onset of sustained 2:1 block (1 AP fired for every 2 stimuli), always observed in hearts perfused with control solution, dantrolene alone, or dantrolene with 8‐CPT. (B) Example of 2:1 block in a control heart. (C) In contrast, protocols performed in hearts treated with 8‐CPT may culminate in (i) 2:1 block or (ii) arrhythmia in the form of ventricular tachycardia (VT). The occurrence of each action potential is marked with an arrow below the stimulus time marking
Figure 3Hearts paced with the S1S2 programmed electrical stimulation (S1S2 PES) protocol to simulate the occurrence of extrasystolic beats within regular pacing. (A) The S1S2 PES protocol was composed of repeats of stimulus trains. Each stimulus is marked out by a vertical marker. Each train consisted of eight S1 stimuli ((A) narrow marker or (B) filled triangles indicating the first and last S1 stimulus in each train; BCL=125 ms), followed by an extrasystolic (S2) stimulus (wide marker in (A) and open triangle in (B)). The interval between the S2 and the preceding S1 stimulus (S1S2 interval) was shortened by 1 ms with each repetition of the S1 stimulus train. The longest S1S2 interval was 124 ms. The S1S2 PES protocol was used to study the effects of progressively shortening S1S2 stimulus intervals on the generation of arrhythmia in hearts perfused with and without drugs. Typical results compared for hearts perfused with (i) control solution, (ii) 8‐CPT, (iii) dantrolene, and (iv) with dantrolene combined with 8‐CPT treatment, showing either extrasysolic action potentials (clear arrows), refractoriness, or an episode of VT. : S1 stimuli; : S2 stimuli; : MAP in response to S2 stimulus
Incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) observed with S1S2 PES and incremental pacing protocols
| Control | 8‐CPT | Dantrolene | Dantrolene with 8‐CPT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of hearts showing incremental pacing induced VT | 0 | 5 | 0 (n=10) | 0 |
| No. of hearts showing S2‐induced VT | 0 | 4 | 1 (n=13) | 0 |
Indicates where there is a significant increase in occurrence of VT in the presence of 8‐CPT in comparison to control solution alone (P<.05).
Indicates where there is a significant reduction in the occurrence of VT in the presence of dantrolene compared to 8‐CPT alone (P<.05).
Action potential (AP) parameters following pharmacological treatment normalised to control values in the same heart
| Activation parameter | 8‐CPT | Dantrolene | Dantrolene + 8‐CPT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latency | 1.14±0.04 (n=7) | 1.04±0.03 (n=10) | 1.09±0.05 (n=8) |
| Recovery parameter | |||
| APD90 | 1.09±0.10 (n=5) | 1.11±0.07 (n=8) | 1.23±0.12 (n=6) |
| BCL at onset of 2:1 block | 0.92±0.05 (n=4) | 0.96±0.02 (n=5) | 0.93±0.08 (n=5) |
| VERP | 1.10±0.11 (n=7) | 0.99±0.13 (n=7) | 0.95±0.13 (n=6) |
APD, action potential duration. BCL, basic cycle length; VERP, ventricular effective refractory period.
Indicates where there is a significant increase in the ratio of AP conduction latency following treatment with 8‐CPT compared prior to treatment in the control condition, as shown by an increase in ratio of latency post‐treatment vs pre‐treatment (P<.01; n=7).