Andrea Forschner1, Susann-Cathrin Olthof2, Brigitte Gückel2, Peter Martus3, Werner Vach4, Christian la Fougère5, Konstantin Nikolaou2, Ulrike Keim6, Thomas Kurt Eigentler6, Claus Garbe6, Christina Pfannenberg2. 1. Department of Dermatology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. andrea.forschner@med.uni-tuebingen.de. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany. 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biostatistics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany. 4. Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany. 6. Department of Dermatology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of 18F-FDG-PET/CT on clinical decision making and outcome in advanced melanoma patients planned for radical metastasectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A cohort of 333 patients with mainly stage III/IV melanoma having a PET/CT for clinical reasons was prospectively enrolled in our oncologic PET/CT registry between 2013 and 2015. Referring physicians completed questionnaires regarding their intended management for each patient before and after PET/CT. Management changes after PET/CT were classified as major and minor changes. A subgroup of 107 patients (stage I, N = 5; stage II, N = 3; stage III, N = 42; stage IV, N = 57) was planned for complete metastasectomy initially, based on conventional imaging. Management changes and outcome were evaluated by linkage with the information obtained from patients' medical records. RESULTS: In 28 of 107 patients (26%), the surgical treatment plan remained unchanged after PET/CT. In 24 patients (22%), minor changes were performed, such as enlargement or reduction of the surgical field. In 55 patients (51%, 95% CI 42%-61%) major changes of the intended treatment plan occurred; of those, 20 patients (19%) were classified to be tumor-free with PET/CT, 32 patients (30%) were found to have multiple previously unrecognized metastases and had to be treated by systemic therapy, three patients (3%) had to be changed to palliative radiotherapy or isolated extremity perfusion. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) in patients with complete metastasectomy (N = 52) was 90% and 79%, respectively. Systemically treated patients (N = 32) resulted in 1-year OS of 72% and 2-year OS of 61%. Eleven of 32 patients (34%) with systemic therapy experienced a complete response. Until December 2016, all 20 patients classified as tumor-free by PET/CT were alive. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the high impact of PET/CT on clinical management in patients with advanced melanoma planned for radical metastasectomy. PET/CT resulted in frequent management changes, preventing futile surgery in half of the patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of 18F-FDG-PET/CT on clinical decision making and outcome in advanced melanomapatients planned for radical metastasectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A cohort of 333 patients with mainly stage III/IV melanoma having a PET/CT for clinical reasons was prospectively enrolled in our oncologic PET/CT registry between 2013 and 2015. Referring physicians completed questionnaires regarding their intended management for each patient before and after PET/CT. Management changes after PET/CT were classified as major and minor changes. A subgroup of 107 patients (stage I, N = 5; stage II, N = 3; stage III, N = 42; stage IV, N = 57) was planned for complete metastasectomy initially, based on conventional imaging. Management changes and outcome were evaluated by linkage with the information obtained from patients' medical records. RESULTS: In 28 of 107 patients (26%), the surgical treatment plan remained unchanged after PET/CT. In 24 patients (22%), minor changes were performed, such as enlargement or reduction of the surgical field. In 55 patients (51%, 95% CI 42%-61%) major changes of the intended treatment plan occurred; of those, 20 patients (19%) were classified to be tumor-free with PET/CT, 32 patients (30%) were found to have multiple previously unrecognized metastases and had to be treated by systemic therapy, three patients (3%) had to be changed to palliative radiotherapy or isolated extremity perfusion. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) in patients with complete metastasectomy (N = 52) was 90% and 79%, respectively. Systemically treated patients (N = 32) resulted in 1-year OS of 72% and 2-year OS of 61%. Eleven of 32 patients (34%) with systemic therapy experienced a complete response. Until December 2016, all 20 patients classified as tumor-free by PET/CT were alive. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the high impact of PET/CT on clinical management in patients with advanced melanoma planned for radical metastasectomy. PET/CT resulted in frequent management changes, preventing futile surgery in half of the patients.
Authors: Caroline Robert; Georgina V Long; Benjamin Brady; Caroline Dutriaux; Michele Maio; Laurent Mortier; Jessica C Hassel; Piotr Rutkowski; Catriona McNeil; Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Kerry J Savage; Micaela M Hernberg; Celeste Lebbé; Julie Charles; Catalin Mihalcioiu; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Cornelia Mauch; Francesco Cognetti; Ana Arance; Henrik Schmidt; Dirk Schadendorf; Helen Gogas; Lotta Lundgren-Eriksson; Christine Horak; Brian Sharkey; Ian M Waxman; Victoria Atkinson; Paolo A Ascierto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Caroline Robert; Luc Thomas; Igor Bondarenko; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey Weber; Claus Garbe; Celeste Lebbe; Jean-François Baurain; Alessandro Testori; Jean-Jacques Grob; Neville Davidson; Jon Richards; Michele Maio; Axel Hauschild; Wilson H Miller; Pere Gascon; Michal Lotem; Kaan Harmankaya; Ramy Ibrahim; Stephen Francis; Tai-Tsang Chen; Rachel Humphrey; Axel Hoos; Jedd D Wolchok Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Annette Pflugfelder; Corinna Kochs; Andreas Blum; Marcus Capellaro; Christina Czeschik; Therese Dettenborn; Dorothee Dill; Edgar Dippel; Thomas Eigentler; Petra Feyer; Markus Follmann; Bernhard Frerich; Maria-Katharina Ganten; Jan Gärtner; Ralf Gutzmer; Jessica Hassel; Axel Hauschild; Peter Hohenberger; Jutta Hübner; Martin Kaatz; Ulrich R Kleeberg; Oliver Kölbl; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Albrecht Krause-Bergmann; Peter Kurschat; Ulrike Leiter; Hartmut Link; Carmen Loquai; Christoph Löser; Andreas Mackensen; Friedegund Meier; Peter Mohr; Matthias Möhrle; Dorothee Nashan; Sven Reske; Christian Rose; Christian Sander; Imke Satzger; Meinhard Schiller; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Gerhard Strittmatter; Cord Sunderkötter; Lothar Swoboda; Uwe Trefzer; Raymond Voltz; Dirk Vordermark; Michael Weichenthal; Andreas Werner; Simone Wesselmann; Ansgar J Weyergraf; Wolfgang Wick; Claus Garbe; Dirk Schadendorf Journal: J Dtsch Dermatol Ges Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.584
Authors: Andrea Forschner; Felizitas Eichner; Teresa Amaral; Ulrike Keim; Claus Garbe; Thomas Kurt Eigentler Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Yan Xing; Yulia Bronstein; Merrick I Ross; Robert L Askew; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard Royal; Janice N Cormier Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Susann-Cathrin Schüle; Thomas Kurt Eigentler; Claus Garbe; Christian la Fougère; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christina Pfannenberg Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Seza A Gulec; Mark B Faries; Chris C Lee; Daniel Kirgan; C Glass; Donald L Morton; Richard Essner Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Christina Pfannenberg; Brigitte Gueckel; Lisa Wang; Sergios Gatidis; Susann-Cathrin Olthof; Werner Vach; Matthias Reimold; Christian la Fougere; Konstantin Nikolaou; Peter Martus Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-09-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Steven P Rowe; Brandon Luber; Monique Makell; Patricia Brothers; JoAnn Santmyer; Megan D Schollenberger; Hannah Quinn; Daniel L Edelstein; Frederick S Jones; Karen B Bleich; William H Sharfman; Evan J Lipson Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2018-09-08 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Annie Wong; Jason Callahan; Marleen Keyaerts; Bart Neyns; Johanna Mangana; Susanne Aberle; Alan Herschtal; Sonia Fullerton; Donna Milne; Amir Iravani; Grant A McArthur; Rodney J Hicks Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 3.909
Authors: Ken Kudura; Florentia Dimitriou; Daniela Mihic-Probst; Urs J Muehlematter; Tim Kutzker; Lucas Basler; Robert Förster; Reinhard Dummer; Joanna Mangana; Lars Husmann; Irene A Burger; Michael Christoph Kreissl Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-05-15