Literature DB >> 28315018

Influence of pelvic volume on surgical outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

G Zur Hausen1, J Gröne1, D Kaufmann2, S M Niehues2, K Aschenbrenner1, A Stroux3, B Hamm2, M E Kreis1, Johannes C Lauscher4,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer is a potentially challenging operation due to limited space in the pelvis. CT pelvimetry allows to quantify pelvic space, so that its relationship with outcome after LAR may be assessed. Studies investigating this, however, yielded conflicting results. We hypothesized that a small pelvis is associated with a higher rate of incomplete mesorectal excision, anastomotic leakages, and increased rate of urinary dysfunction in patients operated for rectal cancer.
METHODS: In a single-center retrospective analysis, we studied 74 patients that underwent LAR for rectal cancer with primary anastomosis. Thin-layered multi-slice CT datasets were used for slice by slice depiction of the inner pelvic surface, and the inner pelvic volume was automatically compounded. The primary outcome was quality of total mesorectal excision (TME; Mercury grading); secondary outcomes were anastomotic leakage and urinary dysfunction with regard to pelvic dimensions. Univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed for the primary and the secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: Shorter obstetric conjugate diameters were associated with a higher probability of a worse TME quality (110.8 ± 10.2 vs. 105.0 ± 8.6 mm; OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.99; p = 0.038). Short interspinous distance showed a trend towards an increased risk for deteriorated TME quality (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.76-1.0; p = 0.06). Anastomotic leakage was associated with anemia (OR 2.77; 95% CI 1.0-7.7; p = 0.047). Association between pelvic diameters or pelvic volume and anastomotic leakage or urinary dysfunction was not observed. Perioperative blood transfusions were administered more often in patients with postoperative urinary dysfunction (OR 17.67; 95% CI 2.44-127.7; p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: Shorter obstetric conjugate diameter might be a risk factor for incompleteness of total mesorectal excision. Anastomotic leakage seems to be influenced more by clinical factors such as anemia rather than pelvic dimensions. Further studies have to prove the influence of pelvic diameter on local recurrence of rectal cancer after LAR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; CT pelvimetry; Completeness of mesorectal excision; Rectal cancer; Rectal resection; Urinary dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28315018     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2793-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  18 in total

1.  The Impact of pelvimetry on anastomotic leakage in a consecutive series of open, laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resections with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. .

Authors:  Emilio Bertani; Antonio Chiappa; Paolo Della Vigna; Davide Radice; Davide Papis; Laura Cossu; Roberto Biffi; Paolo P Bianchi; Fabrizio Luca; Bruno Andreoni
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2014-09

2.  Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Chang S Yu; Seok B Lim; Chan W Kim; Jong H Kim; Tae W Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  CT/MRI pelvimetry as a useful tool when selecting patients with rectal cancer for transanal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Alexander Ferko; Ondřej Malý; Július Örhalmi; Josef Dolejš
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  CT-based measurement of the inner pelvic volume.

Authors:  David Kaufmann; Johannes C Lauscher; Jörn Gröne; Gerrit Zur Hausen; Martin E Kreis; Bernd Hamm; Stefan M Niehues
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer.

Authors:  K M Boyle; D Petty; A G Chalmers; P Quirke; A Cairns; P J Finan; P M Sagar; D Burke
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment is mainly caused by surgery.

Authors:  M M Lange; C P Maas; C A M Marijnen; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; E Klein Kranenbarg; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Variations in pelvic dimensions do not predict the risk of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in rectal cancer.

Authors:  G Salerno; I R Daniels; G Brown; A R Norman; B J Moran; R J Heald
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Lymph node dissection in rectal carcinoma: TME and what else?

Authors:  Jonas Göhl; Werner Hohenberger; Susanne Merkel
Journal:  Onkologie       Date:  2009-01-20

9.  Three-dimensional pelvimetry by computed tomography.

Authors:  M Lenhard; T Johnson; S Weckbach; K Nikolaou; K Friese; U Hasbargen
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Factors influencing pathologic results after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: analysis of consecutive 100 cases.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho; Myeong Jin Kim; Hogeun Kim; Rina K Shinn
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  4 in total

1.  Computed tomography based cross-sectional anatomy of the pelvis predicts surgical outcome after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Gyoung Tae Noh; Soon Sup Chung; Kwang Ho Kim; Ryung-Ah Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 1.859

2.  Magnetic resonance-based pelvimetry and tumor volumetry can predict surgical difficulty and oncologic outcome in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Gulsen Atasoy; Naciye Cigdem Arslan; Funda Dinc Elibol; Ozgul Sagol; Funda Obuz; Selman Sokmen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Anatomical basis for the choice of laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer through the pelvic imaging data-a cohort study.

Authors:  Zhou Yang; Guo Chunhua; Yuan Huayan; Yang Jianguo; Cheng Yong
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Narrow pelvic inlet plane area and obesity as risk factors for anastomotic leakage after intersphincteric resection.

Authors:  Akira Toyoshima; Toshihiro Nishizawa; Eiji Sunami; Ryuji Akai; Takahiro Amano; Akiyoshi Yamashita; Shin Sasaki; Takeshi Endo; Yoshihiro Moriya; Osamu Toyoshima
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-10-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.