Literature DB >> 25436345

The Impact of pelvimetry on anastomotic leakage in a consecutive series of open, laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resections with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. .

Emilio Bertani, Antonio Chiappa, Paolo Della Vigna, Davide Radice, Davide Papis, Laura Cossu, Roberto Biffi, Paolo P Bianchi, Fabrizio Luca, Bruno Andreoni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently, pelvic anatomy has been taken into consideration and related to surgical outcome indicators after low anterior resection (LAR). Several pelvimetric parameters have been matched with conversion rate, postoperative complications and duration of surgery in laparoscopic series, and with the quality of specimen and pathologic outcomes in further open surgical series.
METHODOLOGY: In 97 consecutive patients submitted to sphincter-saving LAR with total mesorectal excision (TME) five pelvic dimensions were measured by abdominal computed tomography scan: anteroposterior and transverse diameters in the pelvic inlet (IAP and ITRA), anteroposterior and transverse diameters in the pelvic outlet (OAP and OTRA), and the pelvic depth. The endpoint evaluated was anastomotic leakage (AL) rate.
RESULTS: There were 51 open, 12 laparoscopic and 34 robotic LARs. The sum of IAP OAP and OTRA (Pelvic Index) significantly predicted AL showing that starting from the cut-point of 290 mm down to a PI of 278 mm the odds-ratio of having an AL increased from 2.63 (95% CI: 1.10,5.47) to 5.07 (95% CI: 1.35,8.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The sum of the 3 pelvic dimensions which we termed “Pelvic Index” was associated to AL following sphinctersaving LAR. This may be considered in planning the surgical strategy for rectal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25436345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  6 in total

1.  Sacrococcygeal dimensions and curvature are associated with resection quality in rectal cancer excision.

Authors:  G Simpson; T Marks; S Blacker; D Smith; C Walsh
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Influence of pelvic volume on surgical outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  G Zur Hausen; J Gröne; D Kaufmann; S M Niehues; K Aschenbrenner; A Stroux; B Hamm; M E Kreis; Johannes C Lauscher
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Computed tomography based cross-sectional anatomy of the pelvis predicts surgical outcome after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Gyoung Tae Noh; Soon Sup Chung; Kwang Ho Kim; Ryung-Ah Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 1.859

4.  Magnetic resonance-based pelvimetry and tumor volumetry can predict surgical difficulty and oncologic outcome in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Gulsen Atasoy; Naciye Cigdem Arslan; Funda Dinc Elibol; Ozgul Sagol; Funda Obuz; Selman Sokmen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Quantitative assessment of mesorectal fat: new prognostic biomarker in patients with mid-to-lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jiyoung Yoon; Yong Eun Chung; Joon Seok Lim; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Mental practice with interactive 3D visual aids enhances surgical performance.

Authors:  Marina Yiasemidou; Daniel Glassman; Faisal Mushtaq; Christos Athanasiou; Mark-Mon Williams; David Jayne; Danilo Miskovic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.