Literature DB >> 28313875

Granivory and microhabitat use in Australian desert rodents: are seeds important?

Brad R Murray1, Chris R Dickman1.   

Abstract

The diet and microhabitat use of two species of native Australian desert rodents, the spinifex hoppingmouseNotomys alexis and sandy inland mousePseudomys hermannsburgensis, were studied in the Simpson Desert, south-western Queensland. Contrary to expectation, both species were confirmed from analyses of their stomach contents to be omnivorous. The diets of both species varied through time in a similar manner; seeds were important in summer and especially in winter, but in autumn invertebrates constituted nearly 50% and 60% of the diet ofN. alexis andP. hermannsburgensis, respectively. Other plant material (root, leaf, floral part, stem) was found in appreciable amounts in the stomach contents of both species, and fungi were identified from a small number of individuals. Both species showed a high degree of overlap in the broad types of food they ingested (seed, plant material, invertebrates); however, there was considerably less overlap in the species of seeds eaten. Analysis of microhabitat use suggested that this difference was due to differential foraging between the species; the larger, bipedalN. alexis forages in the open more than the smaller, quadrupedalP. hermannsburgensis, which is found more commonly in or under hummocks of spinifex grass. Although our findings parallel patterns of morphological specialisation and differential foraging on seeds that have been described within communities of North American heteromyid rodents, we found little evidence that the foraging economics ofN. alexis orP. hermannsburgensis should depend solely or primarily on the distribution patterns of seeds. In the absence of dietary information, we suggest that ecological studies of desert rodents which focus solely on granivory, and neglect other important aspects of rodent foraging, can lead to a misinterpretation of species coexistence and community structure.

Keywords:  Diet Microhabitat; Granivory; Simpson Desert; Species coexistence

Year:  1994        PMID: 28313875     DOI: 10.1007/BF00627733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Association between ingestion of green vegetation and desert rodent reproduction.

Authors:  O J Reichman; K Van De Graaff
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  Competition in desert rodents: an experiment with semipermeable exclosures.

Authors:  J C Munger; J H Brown
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Experiments on seed predation by rodents and ants in the Israeli desert.

Authors:  Zvika Abramsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Cheek pouch capacity in heteromyid rodents.

Authors:  S R Morton; D S Hinds; R E MacMillen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of seed distribution and competitors on seed harvesting efficiency in heteromyid rodents.

Authors:  Stephen C Trombulak; G J Kenagy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Microhabitat segregation in two desert rodent species: the relation of prey availability to diet.

Authors:  John H Harris
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Small mammal seed consumption in the Karoo, South Africa: further evidence for divergence in desert biotic processes.

Authors:  Graham I H Kerley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Australian desert mice: independence of exogenous water.

Authors:  R E MacMillen; A K Lee
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Microhabitat selection in two species of heteromyid rodents.

Authors:  Cliff A Lemen; Michael L Rosenzweig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Mammalian mycophagy: A global review of ecosystem interactions between mammals and fungi.

Authors:  T F Elliott; C Truong; S M Jackson; C L Zúñiga; J M Trappe; K Vernes
Journal:  Fungal Syst Evol       Date:  2022-06-21

2.  Desert mammal populations are limited by introduced predators rather than future climate change.

Authors:  Aaron C Greenville; Glenda M Wardle; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Odour-mediated Interactions Between an Apex Reptilian Predator and its Mammalian Prey.

Authors:  Christopher R Dickman; Loren L Fardell; Nicole Hills
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.793

4.  Interactions of grazing history, cattle removal and time since rain drive divergent short-term responses by desert biota.

Authors:  Anke S K Frank; Chris R Dickman; Glenda M Wardle; Aaron C Greenville
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Diversity and Community Composition of Vertebrates in Desert River Habitats.

Authors:  C L Free; G S Baxter; C R Dickman; A Lisle; L K-P Leung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.