Literature DB >> 28313287

The spatial scale of seed collection by harvester ants.

Deborah M Gordon1.   

Abstract

Colonies of the seed-eating ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus, compete with neighboring colonies for foraging areas. In a conflict over foraging area, what is at stake? This depends on how resources are distributed in time and space: if certain regions consistently provide particularly nutritious seed species, or especially abundant seeds, such regions will be of greater value to a colony. During the summer, seeds were taken from returning foragers in colonies located in 4 different vegetation types. There was no relation between the vegetation currently growing in the foraging area, and the species of seeds collected by ants. During the summer, ants collect mostly seeds produced in previous seasons and dispersed by wind and flooding. In 1991, colonies in all vegetation types collected mostly Bouteloua aristidoides; in 1992, Eriastrum diffusum and Plantago patagonica. There was no relation between colony density and numbers of seeds collected. Seed species collected by ants were compared in different colonies, and on different foraging trails within a colony. The results show that seed patches are distributed on the scale of distances between nests, not the smaller scale of different foraging trails of one colony. It appears that colonies are competing for any space in which to search for seeds, not competing for certain regions of consistently high value.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foraging; Intraspecific competition; Seed-eating ants; Seeds; Territorial behavior

Year:  1993        PMID: 28313287     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Competition between seed-eating rodents and ants in desert ecosystems.

Authors:  J H Brown; D W Davidson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Territorial strategies in ants.

Authors:  B Hölldobler; C J Lumsden
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Intra-and intercolony patterns of nest dispersion in the ant Lasius neoniger: correlations with territoriality and foraging ecology.

Authors:  James F A Traniello; Sally C Levings
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Optimal and central-place foraging theory applied to a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus.

Authors:  K Holder; G A Polis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Ants distinguish neighbors from strangers.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Resource utilization and coexistence of three species of Pogonomyrmex ants in an Upper Sonoran Grassland Community.

Authors:  Stephen Robert Hansen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Dietary similarity and foraging range of two seed-harvester ants during resource fluctuations.

Authors:  S W Rissing
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Native seed preferences of shrub-steppe rodents, birds and ants: the relationships of seed attributes and seed use.

Authors:  M I Kelrick; J A MacMahon; R R Parmenter; D V Sisson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Directional fidelity as a foraging constraint in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis.

Authors:  Jennifer H Fewell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Overdispersion of ant colonies: a test of hypotheses.

Authors:  Randall T Ryti; Ted J Case
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effect of Interactions between Harvester Ants on Forager Decisions.

Authors:  Jacob D Davidson; Roxana P Arauco-Aliaga; Sam Crow; Deborah M Gordon; Mark S Goldman
Journal:  Front Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-05

2.  Spatiotemporal resource distribution and foraging strategies of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Authors:  Michele Lanan
Journal:  Myrmecol News       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.514

3.  Interactive disturbance effects of two disparate ecosystem engineers in North American shortgrass steppe.

Authors:  Christina Alba-Lynn; James K Detling
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Harvester ants use interactions to regulate forager activation and availability.

Authors:  Noa Pinter-Wollman; Ashwin Bala; Andrew Merrell; Jovel Queirolo; Martin C Stumpe; Susan Holmes; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  The ecology of collective behavior.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 6.  A feedback control principle common to several biological and engineered systems.

Authors:  Jonathan Y Suen; Saket Navlakha
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Harvester ant colony variation in foraging activity and response to humidity.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon; Katherine N Dektar; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interactions with combined chemical cues inform harvester ant foragers' decisions to leave the nest in search of food.

Authors:  Michael J Greene; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The dynamics of foraging trails in the tropical arboreal ant Cephalotes goniodontus.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.