Literature DB >> 28312701

How to analyse prey preference when prey density varies? A new method to discriminate between effects of gut fullness and prey type composition.

M W Sabelis1.   

Abstract

State-dependent changes in prey preference are among the phenomena to be expected in studies of predator behaviour. For example, the rate of attack on each prey type is well known to be affected by the state of satiation, the dynamics of which is often assumed to parallel that of gut fullness. An interesting question is whether satiation alone is the determinant of the attack rate or whether the particular mixture of prey types in the predator's direct environment has an additional influence by itself. To detect examples of the latter type the predictive method proposed by Cock (1978) may be useful. In the present paper the predictive tool is a model built on the assumption that gut fullness is the sole internal state variable determining the attack rate. It is provided with parameter estimates from observations in monocultures of each type and then used to predict predation in mixtures of prey types. When measured predation on these prey types differs from what is predicted, the model may be too simple in various respects, one of which is that predators change prey preference in response to their own sample estimates of the densities of each prey type and their (innate or sample) estimate of the profitability of each prey type in terms of reproductive success. Thus, the lack of fit of the model poses a challenging problem, for to explain it one must identify underlying causes, such as differences in prey quality with respect to scarce nutrients or noxious chemicals that need to be detoxified or rendered harmless in other ways. The predictive approach is illustrated by analysis of preference of predatory mites (Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and Typhlodromus occidentalis Nesbitt) with respect to various stages of development of their prey, the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch). The results show that the relation between attack rate and gut fullness might well explain prey stage preference of predatory mites when the prey stages are presented together rather than each alone. In another paper by Dicke et al. (1989) marked deviations between predicted and measured diet are reported when the predatory mite, Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten, was offered a choice between two prey species, i.e. apple rust mites and (larvae of) European red spider mites. The underlying causes are to be revealed by further research, the impetus of which is born out by use of the method proposed by Cock (1978) and extended in this paper.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acari Phytoseiidae; Behaviour; Predation; Prey preference

Year:  1990        PMID: 28312701     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  The sampling characteristics of electivity indices.

Authors:  Martin J Lechowicz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Does prey preference change as a result of prey species being presented together? Analysis of prey selection by the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  Marcel Dicke; Maurice W Sabelis; Henk van den Berg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Holling's "hungry mantid" model for the invertebrate functional response considered as a Markov process. III. Stable satiation distribution.

Authors:  H J Heijmans
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.259

  3 in total
  16 in total

1.  Short-term changes in consumption and oviposition rates of Neoseiulus californicus strains (Acari: Phytoseiidae) after a diet shift.

Authors:  M Castagnoli; S Simoni; G Nachman
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Wound-induced changes in tomato leaves and their effects on the feeding patterns of larval lepidoptera.

Authors:  A M Barker; S D Wratten; P J Edwards
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Does prey preference change as a result of prey species being presented together? Analysis of prey selection by the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  Marcel Dicke; Maurice W Sabelis; Henk van den Berg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Gut expansion and contraction in the predatory soil mite Pergamasus longicornis (Mesostigmata: Parasitidae): a stiff system.

Authors:  Clive E Bowman
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Supplemental food that supports both predator and pest: a risk for biological control?

Authors:  Ada Leman; Gerben J Messelink
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Biological control of Echinothrips americanus by phytoseiid predatory mites and the effect of pollen as supplemental food.

Authors:  Somayyeh Ghasemzadeh; Ada Leman; Gerben J Messelink
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Functional response of Euseius concordis to densities of different developmental stages of the cassava green mite.

Authors:  Evila C Costa; Adenir V Teodoro; Adriano S Rêgo; Marçal Pedro-Neto; Renato A Sarmento
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Potential lethal and non-lethal effects of predators on dispersal of spider mites.

Authors:  Hatsune Otsuki; Shuichi Yano
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.132

9.  Consumption rate, functional response and preference of the predaceous mite Iphiseius degenerans to Tetranychus urticae and Eutetranychus orientalis.

Authors:  A A Fantinou; A Baxevani; F Drizou; P Labropoulos; D Perdikis; G Papadoulis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.132

10.  Functional response of Euseius concordis feeding on Oligonychus ilicis (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae).

Authors:  Erika Carla da Silveira; Paulo Rebelles Reis; Melina Flávia Siqueira; Melissa Alves Toledo; Gilberto Rodrigues Liska; Marcelo Ângelo Cirillo
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.