Literature DB >> 25349063

Supplemental food that supports both predator and pest: a risk for biological control?

Ada Leman1, Gerben J Messelink.   

Abstract

Supplemental food sources to support natural enemies in crops are increasingly being tested and used. This is particularly interesting for generalist predators that can reproduce on these food sources. However, a potential risk for pest control could occur when herbivores also benefit from supplemental food sources. In order to optimize biological control, it may be important to select food sources that support predator populations more than herbivore populations. In this study we evaluated the nutritional quality of four types of supplemental food for the generalist predatory mites Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot and Amblydromalus (Typhlodromalus) limonicus (Garman and McGregor), both important thrips predators, and for the herbivore western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande, by assessing oviposition rates. These tests showed that application of corn pollen, cattail pollen or sterilized eggs of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller to chrysanthemum leaves resulted in three times higher oviposition rates of thrips compared to leaves without additional food. None of the tested food sources promoted predatory mites or western flower thrips exclusively. Decapsulated cysts of Artemia franciscana Kellogg were not suitable, whereas cattail pollen was very suitable for both predatory mites and western flower thrips. In addition, we found that the rate of thrips predation by A. swirskii can be reduced by 50 %, when pollen is present. Nevertheless, application of pollen or Ephestia eggs to a chrysanthemum crop still strongly enhanced the biological control of thrips with A. swirskii, both at low and high release densities of predatory mites through the strong numerical response of the predators. Despite these positive results, application in a crop should be approached with caution, as the results may strongly depend on the initial predator-prey ratio, the nutritional quality of the supplemental food source, the species of predatory mites, the distribution of the food in the crop and the type of crop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25349063     DOI: 10.1007/s10493-014-9859-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  9 in total

Review 1.  Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents?

Authors:  W O C Symondson; K D Sunderland; M H Greenstone
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 2.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin M Bolker; Mollie E Brooks; Connie J Clark; Shane W Geange; John R Poulsen; M Henry H Stevens; Jada-Simone S White
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities.

Authors:  R D Holt
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  How to analyse prey preference when prey density varies? A new method to discriminate between effects of gut fullness and prey type composition.

Authors:  M W Sabelis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Artificial and factitious foods support the development and reproduction of the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii.

Authors:  Duc Tung Nguyen; Dominiek Vangansbeke; Patrick De Clercq
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Suitability of different pollen as alternative food for the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii (Acari, Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  Irina Goleva; Claus P W Zebitz
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Supplemental food affects thrips predation and movement of Orius laevigatus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  D J Skirvin; L Kravar-Garde; K Reynolds; J Jones; A Mead; J Fenlon
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.750

8.  Intra-guild vs extra-guild prey: effect on predator fitness and preference of Amblyseius swirskii (Athias-Henriot) and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  R Buitenhuis; L Shipp; C Scott-Dupree
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 1.750

9.  Oviposition response of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and potential attractants on pecan.

Authors:  Brian A Kunkel; Ted E Cottrell
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.377

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Alternative food and biological control by generalist predatory mites: the case of Amblyseius swirskii.

Authors:  Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Population development of the predatory mite Amblydromalus limonicus is modulated by habitat dispersion, diet and density of conspecifics.

Authors:  Jian-Feng Liu; Jacqueline R Beggs; Zhi-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  The Occurrence of Apparent Competition and Apparent Mutualism in a Modeled Greenhouse System with Two Non-competing Pests and a Shared Biocontrol Agent.

Authors:  M I S Costa; L Anjos
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 1.434

4.  Biological control of Echinothrips americanus by phytoseiid predatory mites and the effect of pollen as supplemental food.

Authors:  Somayyeh Ghasemzadeh; Ada Leman; Gerben J Messelink
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 5.  Review: predatory soil mites as biocontrol agents of above- and below-ground plant pests.

Authors:  Giuditta M Beretta; Jacques A Deere; Gerben J Messelink; Karen Muñoz-Cárdenas; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Evaluation of Natural and Factitious Food Sources for Pronematus ubiquitus on Tomato Plants.

Authors:  Marcus V A Duarte; Dominiek Vangansbeke; Juliette Pijnakker; Rob Moerkens; Alfredo Benavente; Yves Arijs; Ana Lizbeth Flores Saucedo; Felix Wäckers
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.769

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.