Literature DB >> 28312410

Predation pressure on an imperfect Batesian micicry complex in the presence of alternative prey.

Martin Hetz1, C N Slobodchikoff1.   

Abstract

Differential predation pressure and the probability of predation on a Batesian mimicry complex and on alternative prey were estimatedin a field experiment. The mimicry complex was composed of a noxious model (Eleodes obscura (Say)) and a palatable mimic (Stenomorpha marginata (LeConte)). House crickets (Acheta domesticus) (Linn.) were used as alternative prey. The experiment was conducted for 23 nights in August and September to approximate the peak seasonal activity time period during which both models and mimics normally are exposed to predation while foraging and depositing eggs. Each night thirty prey in ratios of 16 models: 7 mimics: 7 crickets were exposed for 2.5 h to a suite of predators consisting of pallid bats (Antrozous pallidus), striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) and ringtails (Bassariscus astutus) that had free access to the prey. The model-mimic ratio was similar to that found in nature. Predators obtained prey on 11 of the 23 nights and preferred the alternative prey (crickets) in proportions higher than was expected from a predation rate that was equal on all species of prey. Mimics were taken by predators at a rate proportional to their abundance, while models were taken at a rate considerably lower than their relative abundance. This suggests that at least some of the predators could distinguish between models and mimics and were willing to eat the mimics at higher frequencies than they were willing to eat the models. However, although the mimicry is not perfect with respect to the entire predator suite, the mimics still gain an advantage by resembling the models, compared to the predation levels on the alternate prey.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative prey; Eleodes obscura; Imperfect Batesian mimicry; Predation; Stenomorpha marginata

Year:  1988        PMID: 28312410     DOI: 10.1007/BF00397872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  MIMICRY: DIFFERENTIAL ADVANTAGE OF COLOR PATTERNS IN THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT.

Authors:  L P BROWER; J V BROWER; F G STILES; H J CROZE; A S HOWER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Defensive secretions of arthropods.

Authors:  T Eisner; J Meinwald
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Batesian mimicry: selective advantage of color pattern.

Authors:  J G Sternburg; G P Waldbauer; M R Jeffords
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  PREDATOR RESPONSES TO ARTIFICIAL BATESIAN MIMICS RELEASED IN A NEOTROPICAL ENVIRONMENT.

Authors:  Lincoln Pierson Brower; Laurence M Cook; Harvey J Croze
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  AN ATTEMPT TO VERIFY MIMETIC ADVANTAGE IN A NEOTROPICAL ENVIRONMENT.

Authors:  Laurence M Cook; Lincoln Pierson Brower; John Alcock
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  THE QUESTION OF SYNCHRONY OR "TEMPORAL SYMPATRY" IN MIMICRY.

Authors:  James E Huheey
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  PHENOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS OF SOME ACULEATE HYMENOPTERA, THEIR DIPTERAN MIMICS, AND INSECTIVOROUS BIRDS.

Authors:  G P Waldbauer; Joseph K Sheldon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.694

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Reproduction and the energy cost of defense in a Batesian mimicry complex.

Authors:  Martin Hetz; C N Slobodchikoff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Hard to catch: experimental evidence supports evasive mimicry.

Authors:  Erika Páez; Janne K Valkonen; Keith R Willmott; Pável Matos-Maraví; Marianne Elias; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.