Literature DB >> 28312031

Partial consumption of prey: the significance of prey water loss on estimates of biomass intake.

Simon D Pollard1.   

Abstract

A number of studies on the feeding behaviour of sucking predators have estimated the weight of biomass the predator extracts from the prey by measuring the weight change occurring in the prey. This method does not consider that a proportion of the prey weight change is lost to the immediate environment. I examined the spider Diaea sp. feeding on the fruit fly Drosophila immigrans and found that the prey lost approximately 28% more weight than the predator gained. This difference was largely explained by water loss from the prey. My results suggest that water loss, which is not available to the predator, is an important part of prey weight loss. To avoid overestimating predator biomass gain it is necessary to measure the predator weight gain directly or take into account water loss as a component of prey weight change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomass estimates; Extraction of biomass; Feeding; Spider

Year:  1988        PMID: 28312031     DOI: 10.1007/BF00377046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  1 in total

1.  Prey capture by the crab spider Misumena calycina (Araneae: Thomisidae).

Authors:  Douglass H Morse
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  A methodological constraint influencing measurement of food intake rates in sucking predators.

Authors:  Simon D Pollard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Constraints affecting partial prey consumption by a crab spider, Diaea sp. indet. (Araneae: Thomisidae).

Authors:  Simon D Pollard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Wolf spider feeding strategies: optimality of prey consumption in Pardosa hortensis.

Authors:  F Samu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Analysis of feeding preference experiments.

Authors:  C H Peterson; P E Renaud
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Variation in foraging success among predators and its implications for population dynamics.

Authors:  Toshinori Okuyama
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.