Literature DB >> 28309174

Prey capture by the crab spider Misumena calycina (Araneae: Thomisidae).

Douglass H Morse1.   

Abstract

Crab spiders Misumena calycina (L.) in pasture rose Rosa carolina flowers regularly attacked bumble bees, smaller bees, and syrphid flies that visited these flowers. Attacks reached a maximum rate of over 20/h during mid morning, but only 1.6% of the most important prey item, bumble bees, were captured. The next most important food source, the most frequently taken item, syrphid flies Toxomerus marginatus (Say), were captured in 39% of the attempts. Since these flies have a biomass only 1/60th that of bumble bees, they comprised a much less important food source than did bumble bees. Spiders would obtain over 7% more food by specializing on bumble bees than by attacking all insect visitors, and as much as 20% more food at certain times of the day. However, they did not show a tendency to specialize at any time.

Entities:  

Year:  1979        PMID: 28309174     DOI: 10.1007/BF00345442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

1.  Hesitation behaviour of hoverflies Sphaerophoria spp. to avoid ambush by crab spiders.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Yokoi; Kenji Fujisaki
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-10-04

2.  Factors affecting the reproductive success of the crab spider Misumenoides formosipes: the covariance between juvenile and adult traits.

Authors:  Michael W Beck; Edward F Connor
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Constraints affecting partial prey consumption by a crab spider, Diaea sp. indet. (Araneae: Thomisidae).

Authors:  Simon D Pollard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Reproductive success and foraging of the crab spider Misumena vatia.

Authors:  Robert S Fritz; Douglass H Morse
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Optimal and central-place foraging theory applied to a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus.

Authors:  K Holder; G A Polis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A comparison of prey lengths among spiders.

Authors:  Wolfgang Nentwig; Christian Wissel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Partial consumption of prey: the significance of prey water loss on estimates of biomass intake.

Authors:  Simon D Pollard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Inflorescence spiders: A cost/benefit analysis for the host plant, Haplopappus venetus Blake (Asteraceae).

Authors:  Svaťa M Louda
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Stochastic prey arrivals and crab spider giving-up times: simulations of spider performance using two simple "rules of thumb".

Authors:  Peter Kareiva; Douglass H Morse; Jill Eccleston
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Fearful foragers: honey bees tune colony and individual foraging to multi-predator presence and food quality.

Authors:  Ken Tan; Zongwen Hu; Weiwen Chen; Zhengwei Wang; Yuchong Wang; James C Nieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.