Literature DB >> 28311993

The feeding ecology of the dingo : III. Dietary relationships with widely fluctuating prey populations in arid Australia: an hypothesis of alternation of predation.

L K Corbett1, A E Newsome2.   

Abstract

Changes in the diet of dingoes (Canis familiaris dingo) in response to measured fluctuations of prey populations were followed over 7 years. The study began after great rains had broken a long drought. Eruptions of rodents and rabbits followed, but some prey were always either relatively abundant (live cattle) or scarce (red kangaroo, lizards, birds). Cattle carcasses were increasingly available during a subsequent drought. Small and medium-sized prey, rodents (26%), lizards (12%) and rabbits (56%) were preferred, probably because they were easily caught. Only rabbits were caten consistently regardless of density. By contrast, large prey were eaten in relatively large amounts only during drought, with initial emphasis on red kangaroos (15% overall) and then cattle (17%) mostly as carcasses. The diet was functionally related to the respective abundances of all major prey species, but the relationship shifted during drought when predation on low populations was most severe. There was evidence that growth of resurging prey populations were suppressed by predation. Diets of dingoes did not differ significantly with age or sex. An hypothesis of 'alternation of predation' is presented: dingoes feed sequentially on prey of increasing size (rodents, rabbits, red kangaroos, cattle) in response to rainy periods and subsequent droughts, meanwhile always concentrating on the staple prey (rabbits). The fluctuating abundances of small and medium-sized prey determined not only their own relative availabilities but also that of large prey, and hence determined the diet of the dingo at any time. Prey availability (catchability, accessability) appeared to be more important than prey abundance (numbers, biomass), and the dingo's flexible social organisation allowed versatility in hunting strategies and defence of resources. We conclude that dingoes do not always forage most efficiently as optimal foraging models predict because of the constraints imposed by the capricious environment in arid Australis, where prey availability fluctuates greatly and becomes limited and clumped in drought, so that dingoes may be faced with outright starvation. Instead we conclude that dingoes utilise a conservative feeding strategy and adopt any behaviour which provides at least a threshold quantity of energy or nutrient as part of a trade-off with other competing ecological requirements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternation of predation; Desert; Dingo; Foraging; Prey availability

Year:  1987        PMID: 28311993     DOI: 10.1007/BF00379362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment.

Authors:  H A SIMON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Helminth parasites of the dingo and feral dog in Victoria with some notes on the diet of the host.

Authors:  B J Coman
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity.

Authors:  A Oaten
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  On optimal diet in a patchy environment.

Authors:  R Heller
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  An ecological comparison of the two arid-zone kangaroos of Australia, and their anomalous prosperity since the introduction of ruminant stock to their environment.

Authors:  A E Newsome
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 4.875

6.  Optimal foraging: A case for random movement.

Authors:  Michael Zimmerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Prey selection by the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.).

Authors:  Mayke Visser
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Integrating science into management of ecosystems in the Greater Blue Mountains.

Authors:  Rosalie S Chapple; Daniel Ramp; Ross A Bradstock; Richard T Kingsford; John A Merson; Tony D Auld; Peter J S Fleming; Robert C Mulley
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Numerical and functional response of predators to a long-term decline in mammalian prey at a semi-arid Neotropical site.

Authors:  F M Jaksié; J E Jiménez; S A Castro; P Feinsinger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Prolonged prey suppression by carnivores - predator-removal experiments.

Authors:  A E Newsome; I Parer; P C Catling
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Prey choice by marten during a decline in prey abundance.

Authors:  Ian D Thompson; Patrick W Colgan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Human-resource subsidies alter the dietary preferences of a mammalian top predator.

Authors:  Thomas M Newsome; Guy-Anthony Ballard; Peter J S Fleming; Remy van de Ven; Georgeanna L Story; Christopher R Dickman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Interspecific and geographic variation in the diets of sympatric carnivores: dingoes/wild dogs and red foxes in south-eastern Australia.

Authors:  Naomi E Davis; David M Forsyth; Barbara Triggs; Charlie Pascoe; Joe Benshemesh; Alan Robley; Jenny Lawrence; Euan G Ritchie; Dale G Nimmo; Lindy F Lumsden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Desert mammal populations are limited by introduced predators rather than future climate change.

Authors:  Aaron C Greenville; Glenda M Wardle; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Assessing predation risk to threatened fauna from their prevalence in predator scats: dingoes and rodents in arid Australia.

Authors:  Benjamin L Allen; Luke K-P Leung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The (non)effects of lethal population control on the diet of Australian dingoes.

Authors:  Benjamin L Allen; Luke K-P Leung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prey use by dingoes in a contested landscape: Ecosystem service provider or biodiversity threat?

Authors:  Damian S Morrant; Christopher M Wurster; Christopher N Johnson; James R A Butler; Bradley C Congdon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.