Literature DB >> 1221459

An ecological comparison of the two arid-zone kangaroos of Australia, and their anomalous prosperity since the introduction of ruminant stock to their environment.

A E Newsome.   

Abstract

This paper discusses the interactions between the large and medium-sized marsupials, the introduced ruminant domestic stock, and the environment in the arid zone of Australia. The grazing of sheep and cattle has produced suitable subclimax pastures which today favor two sympatric kangaroos but not the smaller bandicoots and wallabies. Tall grass tussocks used as shelter by the latter have been grazed down by the ruminants, and replaced by "marsupial lawns" or xeric spinifex, depending on locality, thereby improving the food supplies for the plains kangaroo and the hill kangaroo, respectively. It is argued, however, that even these smaller marsupials benefited originally from the new grazing regime. Patchy grazing of the grasslands probably created edge effects and other early seral changes which improved the food supplies while leaving adequate shelter. Continued grazing by increasingly large numbers of sheep and cattle ultimately and critically removed the shelter and, therefore, eliminated the bandicoots and wallabies. There is evidence that the plains kangaroo, though generally abundant at the present time, is vulnerable to competitive displacement by sheep, cattle, rabbits, and, in one region, by the hill kangaroo when it invades the plains. The plains kangaroo with its diet of green herbage is most threatened during droughts because the other herbivores have finer-grained diets. Like the bandicoots and wallabies the plains kangaroo in at least two localities appears to have first increased in numbers and then decreased. Sheep and cattle numbers have generally done the same. It is postulated, therefore, that there may not be two opposing response curves for the large and medium-sized marsupials to the ruminant invasion of the inland plains, but, in the long run, only one: an initial numerical increase and then decline. Only the time-scale is different, taking 50 years or more for the plains kangaroo, but perhaps half that time or less for the bandicoots and wallabies. The hill kangaroo may be the ultimate winner because it requires the least nitrogen, and the spinifex it eats during drought has spread as part of the subclimax created by ruminants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1221459     DOI: 10.1086/408742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q Rev Biol        ISSN: 0033-5770            Impact factor:   4.875


  3 in total

1.  Body size, duration of parental care, and the intrinsic rate of natural increase in eutherian and metatherian mammals.

Authors:  S D Thompson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The feeding ecology of the dingo : III. Dietary relationships with widely fluctuating prey populations in arid Australia: an hypothesis of alternation of predation.

Authors:  L K Corbett; A E Newsome
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Sounds scary? Lack of habituation following the presentation of novel sounds.

Authors:  Tine A Biedenweg; Michael H Parsons; Patricia A Fleming; Daniel T Blumstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.