Literature DB >> 28311987

The geographical distribution of rarity.

T W Schoener1.   

Abstract

This paper asks the question: are most species that are censused as rare in particular localities rare throughout most of their geographic ranges, or are they common in substantial portions of their ranges elsewhere? The first alternative is labeled suffusive rarity and the second diffusive rarity. To answer this and similar questions, rarity can be measured as the fraction of censuses from some locality (e.g., a quadrat) in which a species occurs (occurrence rarity), or the relative or absolute abundance of the species averaged over all censuses from some locality (abundance rarity). The question was analyzed for occurrence-rarity data from Australian terrestrial birds distributed over 1° (104-km2) quadrats. The great majority of species that are rare in a particular quadrat are not rare and are often common in a substantial number of other quadrats, i.e., these avian species are much closer to the diffusive than suffusive portion of the rarity continuum. The data also show that 1) the distribution of sizes of geographic ranges, whether breeding or total, is highly skewed, appearing exponential to more concave; 2) species are much rarer in their nonbreeding than breeding ranges; 3) more widespread species, whether breeding or total ranges are considered, tend to occur more rarely in a slightly but significantly greater fraction of their ranges; and 4) hawks and owls, typified by high abundance rarity, show occurrence rarity in a greater fraction of their ranges than the average nonraptorial species. Although continental birds may be especially predilected toward diffusive rarity, the present analysis points to identification of centers of abundance as major ways of preserving those species contributing most to recorded instances of rarity. Similar analyses with other kinds of organisms would be most welcome.

Keywords:  Birds (Australian terrestrial); Geographic distributions; Occurrence frequency; Rarity

Year:  1987        PMID: 28311987     DOI: 10.1007/BF00379356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  Island biogeography theory and conservation practice.

Authors:  D S Simberloff; L G Abele
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Island biogeography and conservation: strategy and limitations.

Authors:  J M Diamond
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The first and second moments of some probability distributions arising from points on a lattice and their application.

Authors:  P V K IYER
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1949-06       Impact factor: 2.445

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  The geographical distribution of rarity: misinterpretation of atlas methods affects some empirical conclusions.

Authors:  Thomas W Schoener
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Relative measures of geographic range size: empirical comparisons.

Authors:  Rachel M Quinn; Kevin J Gaston; Henry R Arnold
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Species temporal variability: epigaeic ant assemblages and management for abundance and scarcity.

Authors:  M J Samways
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.225

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.