Literature DB >> 28307303

Relative measures of geographic range size: empirical comparisons.

Rachel M Quinn1,2, Kevin J Gaston3, Henry R Arnold1,2.   

Abstract

Many different measures of range size are used for both empirical and conservation purposes. The possible consequences of the particular methods used in determining observed patterns of results are seldom considered. Using species of butterflies and freshwater molluses in Britain, we investigate the relationship between the range sizes measured by nine different methods and the sets of rare species they distinguish. A comparison of range sizes measured at different scales. Britain and Europe, is also made for the butterflies. We find that for many studies involving range size the various measures of range size are interchangeable. With respect to the identification of rare species the results are not as clear.

Keywords:  Butterflies; Conservation; Molluscs; Rarity

Year:  1996        PMID: 28307303     DOI: 10.1007/BF00327901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  1 in total

1.  The geographical distribution of rarity.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Expansion Speed as a Generic Measure of Spread for Alien Species.

Authors:  Hanno Sandvik
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 1.774

2.  Examining the relationship between local extinction risk and position in range.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Boakes; Nicholas J B Isaac; Richard A Fuller; Georgina M Mace; Philip J K McGowan
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 6.560

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.