Literature DB >> 28311747

Optimal foraging: Random movement by pollen collecting bumblebees.

Michael Zimmerman1.   

Abstract

Two bumblebee species, Bombus bifarius and B. flavifrons, forage randomly with respect to direction when gathering pollen on Potentilla gracilis. Bees avoid revisiting flowers by being able to differentiate recently visited from unvisited flowers. This recognition occurs while bees are flying over open flowers and appears to be a response to the amount of available pollen within flowers. Random foraging with respect to direction is the optimal strategy when the probability of flower revisitation is low. Bumblebees appear to be moving preferentially between nearest neighbors, again as predicted by foraging theory. This behavior causes the establishment of pollen patches in the P. gracilis population. Unlike other pollinators studied in similar situations, bumblebees on P. gracilis do not forage utilizing an area-restricted searching behavior. Because floral reward quality can be assessed at low cost by bees foraging on P. gracilis, their tendency to move to nearby flowers even after encountering a poor quality blossom apparently yields a higher rate of net energy intake than does area-restricted searching. The data indicate that bumblebees exhibit great plasticity in foraging behavior and that they are able to forage efficiently under a wide range of environmental conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  1982        PMID: 28311747     DOI: 10.1007/BF00389020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  Optimization in Ecology: Natural selection produces optimal results unless constrained by history or by competing goals.

Authors:  M L Cody
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-03-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Patchiness in the dispersion of nectar resources: Evidence for hot and cold spots.

Authors:  John M Pleasants; Michael Zimmerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  POLLINATOR FLIGHT DIRECTIONALITY AND ITS EFFECT ON POLLEN FLOW.

Authors:  Donald A Levin; Harold W Kerster; Marianne Niedzlek
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Calculating nectar production rates: residual nectar and optimal foraging.

Authors:  Michael Zimmerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences.

Authors:  G H Pyke
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Pollinator flight directionality and the assessment of pollen returns.

Authors:  Clayton M Hodges; Russell B Miller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Patchiness in the dispersion of nectar resources: Probable causes.

Authors:  Michael Zimmerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Optimal foraging, plant density and the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  Michael Zimmerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Predation by the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.): the influence of hunger and experience.

Authors:  J J Beukema
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.991

10.  An analysis of locomotor behaviour of goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  H Kleerekoper; A M Timms; G F Westlake; F B Davy; T Malar; V M Anderson
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  10 in total

1.  Search mechanism of a stream grazer in patchy environments: the role of food abundance.

Authors:  Steven L Kohler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Gene flow inferred from seed dispersal and pollinator behaviour compared to DNA analysis of restriction site variation in a patchy population of Lotus corniculatus L.

Authors:  I R Rasmussen; B Brødsgaard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Pollen foraging by bumblebees: Foraging patterns and efficiency on Lupinus polyphyllus.

Authors:  Jared Haynes; Michael Mesler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Why do honeybees reject certain flowers?

Authors:  Peter B Wetherwax
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Behavioral responses by bumble bees to variation in pollen availability.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Bees assess pollen returns while sonicating Solanum flowers.

Authors:  Stephen L Buchmann; James H Cane
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Deceptive pollination of Dactylorhiza incarnata: an experimental test of the magnet species hypothesis.

Authors:  Antti Lammi; Markku Kuitunen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Differential reward in "male" versus "female" pollen of functionally dioecious Solanum.

Authors:  Jackie R Ndem-Galbert; Jessica E Hall; Angela J McDonnell; Christopher T Martine
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Geographic profiling applied to testing models of bumble-bee foraging.

Authors:  Nigel E Raine; D Kim Rossmo; Steven C Le Comber
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Patterns of floral nectar standing crops allow plants to manipulate their pollinators.

Authors:  Graham H Pyke; John R M Kalman; Dayanne M Bordin; Lucas Blanes; Philip A Doble
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.