Literature DB >> 28311178

Bees assess pollen returns while sonicating Solanum flowers.

Stephen L Buchmann1,2, James H Cane3.   

Abstract

Can bees accurately gauge accumulating bodily pollen as they harvest pollen from flowers? Several recent reports conclude that bees fail to assess pollen harvest rates when foraging for nectar and pollen. A native nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium Cavanilles) that is visited exclusively for pollen by both solitary and social bees (eg. Ptiloglossa and Bombus) was studied in SE Arizona and SW New Mexico. The flowers have no nectaries. Two experiments were deployed that eliminated "pollen feedback" to the bees by experimentally manipulating flowers prior to bee visits. The two methods were 1) plugging poricidal anthers with glue and 2) emptying anthers of pollen by vibration prior to bee visitation. Both experiments demonstrated that bees directly assess pollen harvest on a flower-by-flower basis, and significantly tailor their handling times, number of vibratile buzzes per flower and grooming bouts according to the ongoing harvest on a given flower. In comparison to experimental flowers, floral handling times were extended for both Bombus and Ptiloglossa on virgin flowers. Greater numbers of intrafloral buzzes and numbers of times bees groomed pollen and packed it into their scopae while still on the flower were also more frequent at virgin versus experimental flowers. Flowers with glued andreocia received uniformly brief visits from Bombus and Ptiloglossa with fewer sonications and virtually no bouts of grooming. Curtailed handling with few buzzes and grooms also characterized visits to our manually harvested flowers wherein pollen was artificially depleted. Sonicating bees respond positively to pollen-feedback while harvesting from individual flowers, and therefore we expect them to adjust their harvesting tempo according to the currency of available pollen (standing crop) within Solanum floral patches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombus; Buzz pollination; Nightshade; Ptiloglossa; Vibratile

Year:  1989        PMID: 28311178     DOI: 10.1007/BF00377073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Pollen foraging by bumblebees: Foraging patterns and efficiency on Lupinus polyphyllus.

Authors:  Jared Haynes; Michael Mesler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Optimal foraging: Random movement by pollen collecting bumblebees.

Authors:  Michael Zimmerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A biophysical model for buzz pollination in angiosperms.

Authors:  S L Buchmann; J P Hurley
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1978-06-20       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Pollinator flight directionality and the assessment of pollen returns.

Authors:  Clayton M Hodges; Russell B Miller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total
  16 in total

1.  Behavioral responses by bumble bees to variation in pollen availability.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  A revision of the Solanum elaeagnifolium clade (Elaeagnifolium clade; subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae).

Authors:  Sandra Knapp; Eva Sagona; Anna K Z Carbonell; Franco Chiarini
Journal:  PhytoKeys       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 1.635

3.  Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Conner; Scott Rush
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Evolutionary trends and diversity of major floral nectary types across Solanaceae.

Authors:  Banisha Phukela; Arjun Adit; Rajesh Tandon
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Variability in bumblebee pollination buzzes affects the quantity of pollen released from flowers.

Authors:  Paul A De Luca; Luc F Bussière; Daniel Souto-Vilaros; Dave Goulson; Andrew C Mason; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Proteomics and post-secretory content adjustment of Nicotiana tabacum nectar.

Authors:  Xue-Long Ma; Richard I Milne; Hong-Xia Zhou; Yue-Qin Song; Jiang-Yu Fang; Hong-Guang Zha
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  A temporal dimension to the influence of pollen rewards on bee behaviour and fecundity in Aloe tenuior.

Authors:  Karl J Duffy; Steven D Johnson; Craig I Peter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bee Community of Commercial Potato Fields in Michigan and Bombus impatiens Visitation to Neonicotinoid-Treated Potato Plants.

Authors:  Amanda L Buchanan; Jason Gibbs; Lidia Komondy; Zsofia Szendrei
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Host-plant location by the Guatemalan potato moth Tecia solanivora is assisted by floral volatiles.

Authors:  Miriam Frida Karlsson; Magali Proffit; Göran Birgersson
Journal:  Chemoecology       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.725

Review 10.  Morphological Complexity as a Floral Signal: From Perception by Insect Pollinators to Co-Evolutionary Implications.

Authors:  Shivani Krishna; Tamar Keasar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.