Literature DB >> 28311601

Nutrient constraints in the feeding ecology of an omnivore in a seasonal environment.

William H Karasov1.   

Abstract

Nutrient requirements of adult, nonreproductive, omnivorous antelope ground squirrels (Ammospermophilus leucurus) were compared with the nutritional value of their food resources. It was found that nutrient constraints would be important factors in ground squirrel feeding ecology primarily in winter. Potentially important constraints were the requirement for water and nitrogen, and a digestive requirement that average dry matter digestibility of the diet exceed ca. 50%. An unlikely constraint was the requirement for any specific mineral. A linear programming model was used to determine potential diets ground squirrels could consume which satisfied these nutritional requirements and also the ground squirrel's daily energy requirements. During spring ground squirrels could be strict herbivores, but during winter before winter rains ground squirrels had to eat some arthropods to satisfy water requirements.These ground squirrels are not energy maximizers because they spend only one third of their activity period feeding and do not accumulate excess energy as fat. Thus, optimum diets were predicted for winter and spring assuming the goal of feeding time minimization. The model correctly predicted that in wintertime ground squirrels would be primarily granivorous but would consume about 20% arthropods, and that they would switch to herbivory in springtime. Ground squirrels, however, selected a wider dietary range than predicted in both winter and spring. Possible reasons for this discrepancy include an inappropriate assumption that ground squirrels forage for food classes nonsimultaneously, and the possibility that ground squirrels employ sampling as part of their foraging behavior.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 28311601     DOI: 10.1007/BF00379866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Daily energy expenditure and the cost of activity in a free-living mammal.

Authors:  William H Karasov
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose.

Authors:  G E Belovsky
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Moose and snowshoe hare competition and a mechanistic explanation from foraging theory.

Authors:  G E Belovsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Nitrogen metabolism in nonruminant herbivores. I. The influence of nonprotein nitrogen and protein quality on the nitrogen retention of adult mares.

Authors:  L M Slade; D W Robinson; K E Casey
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Dietary carcinogens and anticarcinogens. Oxygen radicals and degenerative diseases.

Authors:  B N Ames
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-09-23       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  A causal analysis of diet composition in free ranging cattle in reed-dominated vegetation.

Authors:  J T Vulink; H J Drost
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  How good must models and data be in ecology?

Authors:  Gary E Belovsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Optimal foraging of a herbivorous lizard, the green iguana in a seasonal environment.

Authors:  Wouter D van Marken Lichtenbelt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Optimal foraging and fitness in Columbian ground squirrels.

Authors:  Mark E Ritchie
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  What Is the Relationship between Dopamine and Effort?

Authors:  Mark E Walton; Sebastien Bouret
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 13.837

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.