Literature DB >> 28309404

Moose and snowshoe hare competition and a mechanistic explanation from foraging theory.

G E Belovsky1.   

Abstract

Moose (Alces alces) and snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) appear to compete with each other. This was determined using the "natural experiments" of populations found in sympatry and allopatry on islands at Isle Royale National Park, Michigan, and manipulated exclosures. The population densities from these areas are fit to a series of competition models based upon different competitive mechanisms (Schoener 1974a), using non-linear regression techniques. A model of competition for food where the food can be separated into exclusively used and shared categories is found to predict observed densities of moose and hare best. Finally, the competition model's parameters (fraction of food shared and competition coefficients) are shown to agree with values predicted independently from a foraging model.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 28309404     DOI: 10.1007/BF00396753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

1.  Alternatives to Lotka-Volterra competition: models of intermediate complexity.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF VITO VOLTERRA'S MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE.

Authors:  G F Gause
Journal:  Science       Date:  1934-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Competition between Species: Frequency Dependence.

Authors:  F J Ayala
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Competition in an Indo-Pacific hermit crab community.

Authors:  Peter Abrams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Alternative methods of measuring competition applied to two Australian hermit crabs.

Authors:  Peter Abrams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Reinterpretation of the invalidation of the principle of competitive exclusion.

Authors:  M E Gilpin; K E Justice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1972-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Competition and the form of habitat shift.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Niche overlap and diffuse competition.

Authors:  E R Pianka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Global models of growth and competition.

Authors:  M E Gilpin; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose.

Authors:  G E Belovsky
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.570

View more
  12 in total

1.  Optimal foraging and community structure: implications for a guild of generalist grassland herbivores.

Authors:  G E Belovsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Interspecific competition among grasshoppers and their effect on plant abundance in experimental field environments.

Authors:  Mark E Ritchie; David Tilman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Nutrient constraints in the feeding ecology of an omnivore in a seasonal environment.

Authors:  William H Karasov
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Time budgets of grassland herbivores: body size similarities.

Authors:  G E Belovsky; J B Slade
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Parameter estimation techniques for interaction and redistribution models: a predator-prey example.

Authors:  H T Banks; P M Kareiva; K A Murphy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  An experimental manipulation of the intensity of interspecific competition: effects on a small marsupial.

Authors:  C R Dickman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Resource partitioning by mammalian herbivores in the high Arctic.

Authors:  D R Klein; C Bay
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Resource partitioning among forest owls in the River of No Return Wilderness, Idaho.

Authors:  G D Hayward; E O Garton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu.

Authors:  Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky; Hervé Fritz; Iain J Gordon; Andrew W Illius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Resource partitioning by ungulates on the Isle of Rhum.

Authors:  I J Gordon; A W Illius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.