Literature DB >> 28311523

Environmental conditions affecting the strength of induced resistance against mites in cotton.

R Karban1.   

Abstract

Spider mites (Tetranychus urticae) were raised on cotton plants that had been damaged by a previous bout of mite feeding (T. turkestani) and on control plants that were previously not exposed to mites. The effect of induced plant responses upon mite populations was variable ranging from a 4-fold reduction in population growth to no difference at all. The strength of induced resistance was greatest when the population growth of mites was low for other, unknown, reasons. When mite population growth on control plants was great, the effects of induced resistance were diminished.Mite population growth was inversely related to levels of initial damage caused by previous feeding. There was no evidence of a damage threshold that needed to be exceeded before induced resistance became effective. Increased levels of initial damage were not associated with morphological changes in the plants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cotton; Induced resistance; Plant-herbivore interactions; Population regulation; Spider mites

Year:  1987        PMID: 28311523     DOI: 10.1007/BF00385258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Induced resistance and interspecific competition between spider mites and a vascular wilt fungus.

Authors:  R Karban; R Adamchak; W C Schnathorst
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Induced resistance of cotton seedlings to mites.

Authors:  R Karban; J R Carey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Wound-induced changes in the palatability of Betula pubescens and B. pendula.

Authors:  S D Wratten; P J Edwards; I Dunn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Birch leaves as a resource for herbivores: Seasonal occurrence of increased resistance in foliage after mechanical damage of adjacent leaves.

Authors:  Erkki Haukioja; Pekka Niemelä
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Nutrient stress: an explanation for plant anti-herbivore responses to defoliation.

Authors:  Juha Tuomi; Pekka Niemelä; Erkki Haukioja; Seija Sirén; Seppo Neuvonen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of an early-season folivorous moth on the success of a later-season species, mediated by a change in the quality of the shared host, Lupinus arboreus Sims.

Authors:  Susan Harrison; Richard Karban
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Induced responses of cherry trees to periodical cicada oviposition.

Authors:  Richard Karban
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Previous herbivore attack of red alder may improve food quality for fall webworm larvae.

Authors:  Kathy S Williams; Judith H Myers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Low nutritive quality as defence against herbivores: induced responses in birch.

Authors:  S Neuvonen; E Haukioja
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Herbivores, vascular pathways, and systemic induction: facts and artifacts.

Authors:  Colin Orians
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Systemic induction of feeding deterrents in cotton plants by feeding ofSpodoptera SPP. Larvae.

Authors:  H T Alborn; U S Röse; H J McAuslane
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Induced plant defenses breached? Phytochemical induction protects an herbivore from disease.

Authors:  Mark D Hunter; Jack C Schultz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Generalized plant defense: effects on multiple species.

Authors:  Vera A Krischik; Robert W Goth; Pedro Barbosa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Environmental effects on the induction of wheat chemical defences by aphid infestation.

Authors:  Ernesto Gianoli; Hermann M Niemeyer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Feeding by the aphid Sipha flava produces a reddish spot on leaves of Sorghum halepense: an induced defense?

Authors:  C Costa-Arbulú; E Gianoli; W L Gonzáles; H M Niemeyer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Differential induction of tomato foliar proteins by arthropod herbivores.

Authors:  M J Stout; J Workman; S S Duffey
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  The invasive plant Alternanthera philoxeroides was suppressed more intensively than its native congener by a native generalist: implications for the biotic resistance hypothesis.

Authors:  Shufeng Fan; Dan Yu; Chunhua Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.