Literature DB >> 24227615

Systemic induction of feeding deterrents in cotton plants by feeding ofSpodoptera SPP. Larvae.

H T Alborn1, U S Röse, H J McAuslane.   

Abstract

Cotton,Gossypium hirsutum L., has been shown to exhibit systemic induced resistance to arthropods under certain conditions. We conducted experiments to determine the effects of previous feeding ofSpodoptera exigua Hübner andSpodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) larvae on feeding behavior, growth, and survival of larvae subsequently feeding on cotton. In one feeding choice test,S. exigua larvae preferred young leaves from undamaged control plants to undamaged young leaves from a previously damaged plant. Feeding deterrence was noticeable after only 6 hr of initial feeding damage by larvae, and there was almost complete deterrence after 30 and 54 hr of continuous feeding. In a second feeding choice test,S. littoralis larvae fed more on mature leaves from undamaged control plants than on undamaged mature leaves from previously damaged plants. In no-choice tests, third instars ofS. littoralis fed undamaged young leaves from damaged plants did not gain weight and died by the seventh day, whereas larvae fed young leaves from undamaged control plants gained weight and pupated within 11 days. Sixth instars ofS. littoralis fed either old damaged leaves, old undamaged leaves, or young undamaged leaves all from previously damaged plants gained weight slowly and took more than 12 days to pupate, whereas larvae fed young leaves from undamaged plants gained weight rapidly and pupated within five days of the beginning of the experiment.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24227615     DOI: 10.1007/BF02029945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  5 in total

1.  Induced resistance of cotton seedlings to mites.

Authors:  R Karban; J R Carey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Environmental conditions affecting the strength of induced resistance against mites in cotton.

Authors:  R Karban
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Temporal and spatial variation in palatability of soybean and cotton leaves following wounding.

Authors:  A C Croxford; P J Edwards; S D Wratten
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps.

Authors:  T C Turlings; J H Tumlinson; W J Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Wound-Induced Proteinase Inhibitor in Plant Leaves: A Possible Defense Mechanism against Insects.

Authors:  T R Green; C A Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  10 in total

1.  Systemically induced plant volatiles emitted at the time of "danger".

Authors:  L Mattiacci; B A Rocca; N Scascighini; M D'Alessandro; A Hern; S Dorn
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Within-plant variation in induced defence in developing leaves of cotton plants.

Authors:  P Anderson; J Agrell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Compatible and incompatible Xanthomonas infections differentially affect herbivore-induced volatile emission by pepper plants.

Authors:  Yasmin J Cardoza; James H Tumlinson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Variation in plant defense against invasive herbivores: evidence for a hypersensitive response in eastern hemlocks (Tsuga canadensis).

Authors:  Laura Radville; Arielle Chaves; Evan L Preisser
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  In vivo volatile emissions from peanut plants induced by simultaneous fungal infection and insect damage.

Authors:  Yasmin J Cardoza; Hans T Alborn; James H Tumlinson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Herbivore-induced responses in alfalfa (Medicago sativa).

Authors:  Jep Agrelli; Wieslaw Oleszek; Anna Stochmal; Maria Olsen; Peter Anderson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Pest trade-offs in technology: reduced damage by caterpillars in Bt cotton benefits aphids.

Authors:  Steffen Hagenbucher; Felix L Wäckers; Felix E Wettstein; Dawn M Olson; John R Ruberson; Jörg Romeis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Cotton plant, Gossypium hirsutum L., defense in response to nitrogen fertilization.

Authors:  Yigen Chen; Eric A Schmelz; Felix Wäckers; John R Ruberson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Reduced caterpillar damage can benefit plant bugs in Bt cotton.

Authors:  Michael Eisenring; Steven E Naranjo; Sven Bacher; Angelique Abbott; Michael Meissle; Jörg Romeis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Increased terpenoid accumulation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) foliage is a general wound response.

Authors:  Stefan Opitz; Grit Kunert; Jonathan Gershenzon
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 2.626

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.