Literature DB >> 28311211

What do foraging hummingbirds maximize?

Robert D Montgomerie1, John McA Eadie1, Lawrence D Harder2.   

Abstract

Hainsworth and Wolf (1976) reported that under certain conditions hummingbirds made food choices which did not maximize their net rate of energy intake while foraging. They concluded that the birds were not foraging optimally. We show here that their birds probably maximized a different utility function, the net energy per unit volume consumed (NEVC), which appears to be an optimal choice on a time scale longer than that of a foraging bout. Our own experiments with Archilochus colubris support the conclusion that hummingbirds make foraging decisions that maximize NEVC. A simulation model shows that, in nature, NEVC maximization would require fewer foraging trips and visits to fewer flowers per day to balance daily energy budgets. For territorial birds this can lead to smaller territory sizes and reduced costs of territorial defense. Plants that evolutionarily increase corolla length to enhance pollinator specificity need only increase nectar concentration slightly to maintain the same net energy per unit volume consumed (NEVC) by a given hummingbird pollinator.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 28311211     DOI: 10.1007/BF00390665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Energetics of foraging: rate and efficiency of nectar extraction by hummingbirds.

Authors:  L L Wolf; F R Hainsworth; F G Stiles
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Nectar extraction by hummingbirds: response to different floral characters.

Authors:  Robert D Montgomerie
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Energy limitation of hummingbird populations in tropical and temperate communities.

Authors:  Robert D Montgomerie; C L Gass
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Flower handling efficiency of bumble bees: morphological aspects of probing time.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Energy regulation in hummingbirds.

Authors:  F R Hainsworth
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.548

6.  On the tongue of a hummingbird: its role in the rate and energetics of feeding.

Authors:  F R Hainsworth
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1973-09-01

7.  Nectar Characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds.

Authors:  F Reed Haisworth; Larry L Wolf
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Effects of nectar volume and concentration on sugar intake rates of Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae).

Authors:  R J Mitchell; D C Paton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Nectar extraction by hummingbirds: response to different floral characters.

Authors:  Robert D Montgomerie
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Hummingbirds as net rate maximisers.

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston; David C Krakauer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Energy intake rates and nectar concentration preferences by hummingbirds.

Authors:  Staffan Tamm; Clifton Lee Gass
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Variation in the effect of profitability on prey size selection by the lacertid lizard Psammodromus algirus.

Authors:  José A Díaz; Luis M Carrascal
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of nectar concentration on butterfly feeding: measured feeding rates for Thymelicus lineola (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) and a general feeding model for adult Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Kenneth A Pivnick; Jeremy N McNeil
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.