Literature DB >> 28310404

Habitat selection in tadpoles of Ranidella signifera and R. riparia (Anura: Leptodactylidae).

F J Odendaal1, C M Bull2, R C Nias2.   

Abstract

Two leptodactylid frog species Ranidella signifera and R. riparia occupy adjacent but different habitat types in the Flinders Ranges of South Australia. R. signifera is found in slow-flowing creeks with mud or sand substrates. R. riparia occupies fast-flowing rocky creeks. The two coexist in a narrow overlap zone with heterogeneous habitats. Laboratory experiments were used to test habitat preferences of tadpoles in a tub with sand and rock substrates. R. riparia was most commonly found on the rock substrate. R. signifera showed no distinct preference for sand, but when mixed with R. riparia increased its use of the habitat in the spaces between and under rocks. This was particularly apparent in flowing water where 81% of all R. signifera tadpoles were observed in this sheltered habitat.The data suggest that R. signifera tadpoles have reduced fitness in flowing water because they cannot exploit exposed feeding sites where most of the algae grow, and that interspecific interactions with R. riparia tadpoles reduce their fitness further. This helps to explain why R. signifera do not extend their distribution into R. riparia occupied creeks. The data do not explain why R. riparia do not colonize the slow muddy creeks occupied by R. signifera.

Entities:  

Year:  1982        PMID: 28310404     DOI: 10.1007/BF00367968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Resource partitioning in ecological communities.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Habitat selection in tadpoles of Ranidella signifera and R. riparia (Anura: Leptodactylidae).

Authors:  F J Odendaal; C M Bull; R C Nias
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Call differences and calling site segregation in anuran species from central Amazonian floating meadows.

Authors:  Walter Hödl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  PHENOTYPIC VARIATION AND THE OUTCOME OF INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION IN HYLID TADPOLES.

Authors:  Joseph Travis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment.

Authors:  Catherine A Toft
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The habitat preference of Microtus pennsylvanicus, and its relevance to the distribution of this species on islands.

Authors:  P R Grant
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Perturbation analysis of competition and overlap in habitat utilization between Dipodomys ordii and Dipodomys merriami.

Authors:  Gene D Schroder; Michael L Rosenzweig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Suspension feeding dynamics of anuran larvae related to their functional morphology.

Authors:  D B Seale; R J Wassersug
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Ecological Aspects of Amphibian Metamorphosis: Nonnormal distributions of competitive ability reflect selection for facultative metamorphosis.

Authors:  H M Wilbur; J P Collins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-12-28       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Habitat selection in tadpoles of Ranidella signifera and R. riparia (Anura: Leptodactylidae).

Authors:  F J Odendaal; C M Bull; R C Nias
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Reproductive interference between three parapatric species of reptile tick.

Authors:  R H Andrews; T N Petney; C M Bull
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Water movements, tadpole competition and limits to the distribution of the frogs Ranidella riparia and R. signifera.

Authors:  F J Odendaal; C M Bull
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.225

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.