Literature DB >> 28308495

Fishing spiders, green sunfish, and a stream-dwelling water strider: male-female conflict and prey responses to single versus multiple predator environments.

James J Krupa1, Andrew Sih1.   

Abstract

Many studies have experimentally addressed the effects of a particular predator species on prey behavior. In nature, however, prey frequently face multiple species of predators that often vary in their predatory mode and in their level of predation risk. Relatively few studies have considered prey responses under these complex conditions. In Kentucky, the stream-dwelling water strider (Aquariusremigis) coexists with many potentially dangerous predators, two of which are the green sunfish (Lepomiscyanellus) and the fishing spider (Dolomedesvittatus). Green sunfish occupy stream pools and attack water striders from below. In contrast, fishing spiders hunt along stream shorelines where they perch on overhanging vegetation or rocks and attack water striders near shore. We compared how A. remigis individuals respond to these two very different predators in pools with one or both predators. The presence of sunfish in pools had strong effects on male water strider behavior, including increased use of three types of refuge from sunfish (riffles, climbing out of the water, sitting on the water but at the edges of pools), decreased activity and a decreased number of aggressive males on the water. Spiders also influenced water strider behavior; male water striders avoided spiders by shifting away from the edges of pools. Comparisons of the effects of the two predator species showed that in general, antipredator responses by male water striders were stronger in pools with fish alone than in those with spiders alone. In the presence of both predators, male water strider behavior (microhabitat use and activity) was generally similar to behavior in the presence of fish alone. In contrast, female water striders showed no significant response to the presence of sunfish, and little response to the presence of spiders. This lack of response could be because females spent much of their time in refuges even in the absence of predators (apparently hiding from harassment by males). Both spiders and fish caused decreases in water strider mating activity. The presence of fish reduced both the number of matings per pool (mating frequency), and mean mating durations. Spiders induced a decrease in mean mating duration, but not in mating frequency. The largest reductions in mating activity occurred in pools with both predators present. Pools with either spiders or fish alone suffered 15-20% water strider mortality during our experiment (versus no mortality in predator-free pools). Extant theory suggests that when prey face conflicting microhabitat responses to two predators (as in this study), the predators should have facilitative effects on predation rates (i.e., prey that avoid one predator are often killed by the other and vice versa). Mortality rates in pools with both predators present, however, were not significantly different from that predicted by a null model of multiple predator effects. The lack of predator facilitation can be explained by the compensatory reductions in water strider activity and mating activity in the presence of both predators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Key words Water striders ;  Mating systems ;  Multiple predators;  Predation risk 

Year:  1998        PMID: 28308495     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Estimating the prevalence and strength of non-independent predator effects.

Authors:  Heather D Vance-Chalcraft; Daniel A Soluk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The rules of engagement: how to defend against combinations of predators.

Authors:  Jason T Hoverman; Rick A Relyea
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Shoaling behaviour enhances risk of predation from multiple predator guilds in a marine fish.

Authors:  John R Ford; Stephen E Swearer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Fine-scale behavioural adjustments of prey on a continuum of risk.

Authors:  Maud I A Kent; James E Herbert-Read; Gordon McDonald; A Jamie Wood; Ashley J W Ward
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Male Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae) vary mate-searching behavior but not signaling behavior in response to spider silk.

Authors:  Kasey D Fowler-Finn; Nooria Al-Wathiqui; Daniel Cruz; Mishal Al-Wathiqui; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-02-02

6.  Behavioural and neural responses of crabs show evidence for selective attention in predator avoidance.

Authors:  Zahra M Bagheri; Callum G Donohue; Julian C Partridge; Jan M Hemmi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Population structure influences sexual conflict in wild populations of water striders.

Authors:  Omar Tonsi Eldakar; Michael J Dlugos; Galen P Holt; David Sloan Wilson; Johnw Pepper
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.991

8.  Facing different predators: adaptiveness of behavioral and morphological traits under predation.

Authors:  Martina Heynen; Nils Bunnefeld; Jost Borcherding
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 9.  Fish predation by semi-aquatic spiders: a global pattern.

Authors:  Martin Nyffeler; Bradley J Pusey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Facing a Clever Predator Demands Clever Responses - Red-Backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio) vs. Eurasian Magpies (Pica pica).

Authors:  Michaela Syrová; Michal Němec; Petr Veselý; Eva Landová; Roman Fuchs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.