Literature DB >> 28308394

Transpiration and whole-tree conductance in ponderosa pine trees of different heights.

M G Ryan1, B J Bond2, B E Law2, R M Hubbard1, D Woodruff2, E Cienciala3, J Kucera4.   

Abstract

Changes in leaf physiology with tree age and size could alter forest growth, water yield, and carbon fluxes. We measured tree water flux (Q) for 14 ponderosa pine trees in two size classes (12 m tall and ∼40 years old, and 36 m tall and ∼ 290 years old) to determine if transpiration (E) and whole-tree conductance (g t) differed between the two sizes of trees. For both size classes, E was approximately equal to Q measured 2 m above the ground: Q was most highly correlated with current, not lagged, water vapor pressure deficit, and night Q was <12% of total daily flux. E for days 165-195 and 240-260 averaged 0.97 mmol m-2 (leaf area, projected) s-1 for the 12-m trees and 0.57 mmol m-2 (leaf area) s-1 for the 36-m trees. When photosynthetically active radiation (I P) exceeded the light saturation for photosynthesis in ponderosa pine (900 µmol m-2 (ground) s-1), differences in E were more pronounced: 2.4 mmol m-2 (leaf area) s-1 for the 12-m trees and 1.2 mmol m-2 s-1 for the 36-m trees, yielding g t of 140 mmol m-2 (leaf area) s-1 for the 12-m trees and 72 mmol m-2 s-1 for the 36-m trees. Extrapolated to forests with leaf area index =1, the 36-m trees would transpire 117 mm between 1 June and 31 August compared to 170 mm for the 12-m trees, a difference of 15% of average annual precipitation. Lower g t in the taller trees also likely lowers photosynthesis during the growing season.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Humidity response of stomatal conductance; Hydraulic conductance; Key words Transpiration; Whole-tree conductance

Year:  2000        PMID: 28308394     DOI: 10.1007/s004420000403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Hydraulic compensation in northern Rocky Mountain conifers: does successional position and life history matter?

Authors:  Anna Sala
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Ecosystem implications of genetic variation in water-use of a dominant riparian tree.

Authors:  D G Fischer; S C Hart; T G Whitham; G D Martinsen; P Keim
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Global tree intrinsic water use efficiency is enhanced by increased atmospheric CO2 and modulated by climate and plant functional types.

Authors:  Justin M Mathias; Richard B Thomas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The pipe model theory half a century on: a review.

Authors:  Romain Lehnebach; Robert Beyer; Véronique Letort; Patrick Heuret
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Environmental sensitivity of gas exchange in different-sized trees.

Authors:  Nate G McDowell; Julian Licata; Barbara J Bond
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Tree height and age-related decline in growth in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.).

Authors:  Jordi Martínez-Vilalta; Dirk Vanderklein; Maurizio Mencuccini
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Hydraulic constraints modify optimal photosynthetic profiles in giant sequoia trees.

Authors:  Anthony R Ambrose; Wendy L Baxter; Christopher S Wong; Stephen S O Burgess; Cameron B Williams; Rikke R Næsborg; George W Koch; Todd E Dawson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Photosynthesis in developing leaf of juveniles and adults of three Mediterranean species with different growth forms.

Authors:  Christos Chondrogiannis; George Grammatikopoulos
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Investigating old-growth ponderosa pine physiology using tree-rings, δ13 C, δ18 O, and a process-based model.

Authors:  Danielle E M Ulrich; Christopher Still; J Renée Brooks; Youngil Kim; Frederick C Meinzer
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Transpiration and canopy conductance in an inner alpine Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forest.

Authors:  Gerhard Wieser; Marco Leo; Walter Oberhuber
Journal:  Flora       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.