Literature DB >> 15959823

Environmental sensitivity of gas exchange in different-sized trees.

Nate G McDowell1, Julian Licata, Barbara J Bond.   

Abstract

The carbon isotope signature (delta13C) of foliar cellulose from sunlit tops of trees typically becomes enriched as trees of the same species in similar environments grow taller, indicative of size-related changes in leaf gas exchange. However, direct measurements of gas exchange in common environmental conditions do not always reveal size-related differences, even when there is a distinct size-related trend in delta13C of the very foliage used for the gas exchange measurements. Since delta13C of foliage predominately reflects gas exchange during spring when carbon is incorporated into leaf cellulose, this implies that gas exchange differences in different-sized trees are most likely to occur in favorable environmental conditions during spring. If gas exchange differs with tree size during wet but not dry conditions, then this further implies that environmental sensitivity of leaf gas exchange varies as a function of tree size. These implications are consistent with theoretical relationships among height, hydraulic conductance and gas exchange. We investigated the environmental sensitivity of gas exchange in different-sized Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) via a detailed process model that specifically incorporates size-related hydraulic conductance [soil-plant-atmosphere (SPA)], and empirical measurements from both wet and dry periods. SPA predicted, and the empirical measurements verified, that differences in gas exchange associated with tree size are greatest in wet and mild environmental conditions and minimal during drought. The results support the hypothesis that annual net carbon assimilation and transpiration of trees are limited by hydraulic capacity as tree size increases, even though at particular points in time there may be no difference in gas exchange between different-sized trees. Maximum net ecosystem exchange occurs in spring in Pacific Northwest forests; therefore, the presence of hydraulic limitations during this period may play a large role in carbon uptake differences with stand-age. The results also imply that the impacts of climate change on the growth and physiology of forest trees will vary depending on the age and size of the forest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15959823     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0104-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  26 in total

1.  Use of a simulation model and ecosystem flux data to examine carbon-water interactions in ponderosa pine.

Authors:  M Williams; B E Law; P M Anthoni; M H Unsworth
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Regulation of stomatal conductance and transpiration in forest canopies.

Authors:  David Whitehead
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1998 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.196

3.  Models of water flux through forest stands: critical leaf and stand parameters.

Authors:  David Whitehead; Thomas M. Hinckley
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1991 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 4.196

4.  Water transport in trees: current perspectives, new insights and some controversies.

Authors:  F C. Meinzer; M J. Clearwater; G Goldstein
Journal:  Environ Exp Bot       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.545

5.  The limits to tree height.

Authors:  George W Koch; Stephen C Sillett; Gregory M Jennings; Stephen D Davis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Declining forest productivity in aging forest stands: a modeling analysis of alternative hypotheses.

Authors:  Danuse Murty; Ross E. McMurtrie; Michael G. Ryan
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.196

7.  Hydraulic conductance, light interception and needle nutrient concentration in Scots pine stands and their relations with net primary productivity.

Authors:  M Mencuccini; J Grace
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.196

8.  An investigation of hydraulic limitation and compensation in large, old Douglas-fir trees.

Authors:  Nate G McDowell; Nathan Phillips; Claire Lunch; Barbara J Bond; Michael G Ryan
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.196

9.  Vertical gradients in photosynthetic light response within an old-growth Douglas-fir and western hemlock canopy.

Authors:  J. D. Lewis; R. B. McKane; D. T. Tingey; P. A. Beedlow
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Differences in leaf gas exchange and water relations among species and tree sizes in an Arizona pine-oak forest.

Authors:  T. E. Kolb; J. E. Stone
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.196

View more
  5 in total

1.  Increase in water-use efficiency and underlying processes in pine forests across a precipitation gradient in the dry Mediterranean region over the past 30 years.

Authors:  Kadmiel Maseyk; Debbie Hemming; Alon Angert; Steven W Leavitt; Dan Yakir
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  No evidence of carbon limitation with tree age and height in Nothofagus pumilio under Mediterranean and temperate climate conditions.

Authors:  Frida I Piper; Alex Fajardo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Hydrostatic constraints on morphological exploitation of light in tall Sequoia sempervirens trees.

Authors:  Hiroaki T Ishii; Gregory M Jennings; Stephen C Sillett; George W Koch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Coordination of leaf and stem water transport properties in tropical forest trees.

Authors:  Frederick C Meinzer; David R Woodruff; Jean-Christophe Domec; Guillermo Goldstein; Paula I Campanello; M Genoveva Gatti; Randol Villalobos-Vega
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Scaling of xylem and phloem transport capacity and resource usage with tree size.

Authors:  Teemu Hölttä; Miika Kurppa; Eero Nikinmaa
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.753

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.