Literature DB >> 28308384

Resource overlap and possible competition between honey bees and wild bees in central Europe.

I Steffan-Dewenter1, T Tscharntke1.   

Abstract

Evidence for interspecific competition between honey bees and wild bees was studied on 15 calcareous grasslands with respect to: (1) foraging radius of honey bees, (2) overlap in resource use, and (3) possible honey bee effects on species richness and abundance of flower-visiting, ground-nesting and trap-nesting wild bees. The grasslands greatly differed in the number of honey bee colonies within a radius of 2 km and were surrounded by agricultural habitats. The number of flower-visiting honey bees on both potted mustard plants and small grassland patches declined with increasing distance from the nearest apiary and was almost zero at a distance of 1.5-2.0 km. Wild bees were observed visiting 57 plant species, whereas honey bees visited only 24 plant species. Percentage resource overlap between honey bees and wild bees was 45.5%, and Hurlbert's index of niche overlap was 3.1. In total, 1849 wild bees from 98 species were recorded on the calcareous grasslands. Neither species richness nor abundance of wild bees were negatively correlated with the density of honey bee colonies (within a radius of 2 km) or the density of flower-visiting honey bees per site. Abundance of flower- visiting wild bees was correlated only with the percentage cover of flowering plants. In 240 trap nests, 1292 bee nests with 6066 brood cells were found. Neither the number of bee species nor the number of brood cells per grassland was significantly correlated with the density of honey bees. Significant correlations were found only between the number of brood cells and the percentage cover of shrubs. The number of nest entrances of ground-nesting bees per square metre was not correlated with the density of honey bees but was negatively correlated with the cover of vegetation. Interspecific competition by honey bees for food resources was not shown to be a significant factor determining abundance and species richness of wild bees.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conservation; Flower visitation; Foraging distance; Grasslands; Key words Community structure

Year:  2000        PMID: 28308384     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  21 in total

1.  Honeybees increase fruit set in native plant species important for wildlife conservation.

Authors:  Luis Cayuela; Sarah Ruiz-Arriaga; Christian P Ozers
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Diverging landscape impacts on macronutrient status despite overlapping diets in managed (Apis mellifera) and native (Melissodes desponsa) bees.

Authors:  Christina L Mogren; María-Soledad Benítez; Kevin McCarter; Frédéric Boyer; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.079

3.  Reproduction and survival of a solitary bee along native and exotic floral resource gradients.

Authors:  Jennifer D Palladini; John L Maron
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Habitat fragmentation leads to reduced pollinator visitation, fruit production and recruitment in urban mangrove forests.

Authors:  Tyge D Hermansen; Todd E Minchinton; David J Ayre
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effect of biotic factors on the spatial distribution of stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Meliponini) in fragmented neotropical habitats.

Authors:  M M Fierro; L Cruz-López; D Sánchez; R Villanueva-Gutiérrez; R Vandame
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 1.434

6.  Occurrence of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Pathogens in Wild Pollinators in Northern Italy.

Authors:  Giovanni Cilia; Simone Flaminio; Laura Zavatta; Rosa Ranalli; Marino Quaranta; Laura Bortolotti; Antonio Nanetti
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.073

7.  Honeybee nutrition is linked to landscape composition.

Authors:  Philip Donkersley; Glenn Rhodes; Roger W Pickup; Kevin C Jones; Kenneth Wilson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 8.  Do managed bees have negative effects on wild bees?: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Rachel E Mallinger; Hannah R Gaines-Day; Claudio Gratton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Red mason bees cannot compete with honey bees for floral resources in a cage experiment.

Authors:  Anika Hudewenz; Alexandra-Maria Klein
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The neglected bee trees: European beech forests as a home for feral honey bee colonies.

Authors:  Patrick Laurenz Kohl; Benjamin Rutschmann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.