Literature DB >> 28308024

Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants.

Susanne Schwinning1, Jacob Weiner2.   

Abstract

When plants are competing, larger individuals often obtain a disproportionate share of the contested resources and suppress the growth of their smaller neighbors, a phenomenon called size-asymmetric competition. We review what is known about the mechanisms that give rise to and modify the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants, and attempt to clarify some of the confusion in the literature on size asymmetry. We broadly distinguish between mechanisms determined primarily by characteristics of contested resource from those that are influenced by the growth and behavior of the plants themselves. To generate size asymmetric resource competition, a resource must be "pre-emptable." Because of its directionality, light is the primary, but perhaps not the only, example of a pre-emptable resource. The available data suggest that competition for mineral nutrients is often size symmetric (i.e., contested resources are divided in proportion to competitor sizes), but the potential role of patchily and/or episodically supplied nutrients in causing size asymmetry is largely unexplored. Virtually nothing is known about the size symmetry of competition for water. Plasticity in morphology and physiology acts to reduce the degree of size asymmetry in competition. We argue that an allometric perspective on growth, allocation, resource uptake, and resource utilization can help us understand and quantify the mechanisms through which plants compete.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry of growth and resource uptake; Competition in clonal plants.; Key words Resource competition; Plasticity; Spatial patterns

Year:  1998        PMID: 28308024     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  61 in total

1.  The theory and application of plant competition models: an agronomic perspective.

Authors:  Sarah E Park; Laurence R Benjamin; Andrew R Watkinson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Root foraging for patchy resources in eight herbaceous plant species.

Authors:  Tara K Rajaniemi; Heather L Reynolds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Planting densities and bird and rodent absence affect size distributions of four dicots in synthetic tallgrass communities.

Authors:  Cristina Martínez-Garza; Sonali Saha; Veronica Torres; Joel S Brown; Henry F Howe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  High shoot plasticity favours plant coexistence in herbaceous vegetation.

Authors:  Mari Lepik; Jaan Liira; Kristjan Zobel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A new perspective on size hierarchies in nature: patterns, causes, and consequences.

Authors:  Peter M Buston; Michael A Cant
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A new method for non-destructive measurement of biomass, growth rates, vertical biomass distribution and dry matter content based on digital image analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Tackenberg
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Competition, traits and resource depletion in plant communities.

Authors:  Cyrille Violle; Eric Garnier; Jérémie Lecoeur; Catherine Roumet; Cécile Podeur; Alain Blanchard; Marie-Laure Navas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Differential impacts of plant interactions on herbaceous species recruitment: disentangling factors controlling emergence, survival and growth of seedlings.

Authors:  Adeline Fayolle; Cyrille Violle; Marie-Laure Navas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Light and competition gradients fail to explain the coexistence of shade-tolerant Fagus sylvatica and shade-intermediate Quercus petraea seedlings.

Authors:  Rosalinde Van Couwenberghe; Jean-Claude Gégout; Eric Lacombe; Catherine Collet
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Duration of the conditioning phase affects the results of plant-soil feedback experiments via soil chemical properties.

Authors:  Clémentine Lepinay; Zuzana Vondráková; Tomáš Dostálek; Zuzana Münzbergová
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.