Literature DB >> 14576077

The theory and application of plant competition models: an agronomic perspective.

Sarah E Park1, Laurence R Benjamin, Andrew R Watkinson.   

Abstract

Many studies of plant competition have been directed towards understanding how plants respond to density in monocultures and how the presence of weeds affects yield in crops. In this Botanical Briefing, the development and current understanding of plant competition is reviewed, with particular emphasis being placed on the theory of plant competition and the development and application of mathematical models to crop-weed competition and the dynamics of weeds in crops. By consolidating the results of past research in this manner, it is hoped to offer a context in which researchers can consider the potential directions for future research in competition studies and its application to integrated weed management.

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 14576077      PMCID： PMC4243621          DOI： 10.1093/aob/mcg204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN： 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  10 in total

1.  Nonmanipulative determination of plant community dynamics.

Authors:  R P. Freckleton; A R. Watkinson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops.

Authors:  A R Watkinson; R P Freckleton; R A Robinson; W J Sutherland
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A novel approach to the use of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefit.

Authors:  Alan M Dewar; Mike J May; Ian P Woiwod; Lisa A Haylock; Gillian T Champion; Beulah H Garner; Richard J N Sands; Aiming Qi; John D Pidgeon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Effects of competitive asymmetry on a local density model of plant interference.

Authors:  S W Pacala; J Weiner
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1991-03-21       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Interspecific competition in plants: how well do current methods answer fundamental questions?

Authors:  J Connolly; P Wayne; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities.

Authors:  P Chesson; N Huntly
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  The meaning and measurement of size hierarchies in plant populations.

Authors:  Jacob Weiner; Otto T Solbrig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants.

Authors:  Susanne Schwinning; Jacob Weiner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Plant competition for light analyzed with a multispecies canopy model : I. Model development and influence of enhanced UV-B conditions on photosynthesis in mixed wheat and wild oat canopies.

Authors:  R J Ryel; P W Barnes; W Beyschlag; M M Caldwell; S D Flint
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Determinants of the abundance of invasive annual weeds: community structure and non-equilibrium dynamics.

Authors:  R P Freckleton; A R Watkinson; P M Dowling; A R Ley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349
  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Intra- and interspecies competition of blackgrass and wheat in the context of herbicidal resistance and environmental conditions in Poland.

Authors:  Anna Wenda-Piesik; Agnieszka Synowiec; Katarzyna Marcinkowska; Barbara Wrzesińska; Cezary Podsiadło; Krzysztof Domaradzki; Piotr Kuc; Ewa Kwiecińska-Poppe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Opportunities for improving cancer treatment using systems biology.

Authors:  Jason I Griffiths; Adam L Cohen; Veronica Jones; Ravi Salgia; Jeffrey T Chang; Andrea H Bild
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2019-11-27

3.  How much detail and accuracy is required in plant growth sub-models to address questions about optimal management strategies in agricultural systems?

Authors:  Michael Renton
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 3.276

4.  The yield of mechanically harvested rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) can be increased by optimum plant density and row spacing.

Authors:  Jie Kuai; Yingying Sun; Qingsong Zuo; Haidong Huang; Qingxi Liao; Chongyou Wu; Jianwei Lu; Jiangsheng Wu; Guangsheng Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Interactions of Nitrogen Source and Rate and Weed Removal Timing Relative to Nitrogen Content in Corn and Weeds and Corn Grain Yield.

Authors:  Alexandra M Knight; Wesley J Everman; David L Jordan; Ronnie W Heiniger; T Jot Smyth
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2017-04-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.